The Annals of pharmacotherapy · 2005
Breakthrough Candida infections in patients receiving voriconazole.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gerzenshtein Lana, Patel Shilpa M, Scarsi Kimberly K, Postelnick Michael J, Flaherty John P
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To describe 2 instances of breakthrough Candida infection in 2 patients on treatment doses of voriconazole.
CASE SUMMARIES: A 27-year-old woman with systemic lupus erythematosus was receiving high-dose voriconazole (400 mg twice daily) for central nervous system lesions of unknown origin and developed oral thrush. The patient was receiving concomitant therapy with phenytoin 400 mg/day. The voriconazole dose was increased to 400 mg 3 times daily, and the thrush resolved. A 50-year-old man with HIV infection was receiving enfuvirtide, lamivudine, tenofovir, and efavirenz 600 mg/day, as well as prophylactic trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and azithromycin. He was started on voriconazole 200 mg twice daily for pulmonary aspergillosis and developed esophageal candidiasis. The voriconazole dose was increased to 350 mg twice daily, and the thrush eventually resolved.
DISCUSSION: Both reactions were probable according to the Naranjo probability scale. Significant drug interactions may have played a role in the development of breakthrough infections in these patients, specifically with phenytoin and efavirenz. Voriconazole is metabolized primarily by CYP2C19, as well as CYP2C9 and CYP3A4. Voriconazole is also known to inhibit these enzymes, and the manufacturer reports an extensive list of drugs that interact with voriconazole.
CONCLUSIONS: Although requiring systematic evaluation, there may be a role for voriconazole serum concentration monitoring to ensure therapeutic efficacy when significant drug interactions are suspected.
CASE SUMMARIES: A 27-year-old woman with systemic lupus erythematosus was receiving high-dose voriconazole (400 mg twice daily) for central nervous system lesions of unknown origin and developed oral thrush. The patient was receiving concomitant therapy with phenytoin 400 mg/day. The voriconazole dose was increased to 400 mg 3 times daily, and the thrush resolved. A 50-year-old man with HIV infection was receiving enfuvirtide, lamivudine, tenofovir, and efavirenz 600 mg/day, as well as prophylactic trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and azithromycin. He was started on voriconazole 200 mg twice daily for pulmonary aspergillosis and developed esophageal candidiasis. The voriconazole dose was increased to 350 mg twice daily, and the thrush eventually resolved.
DISCUSSION: Both reactions were probable according to the Naranjo probability scale. Significant drug interactions may have played a role in the development of breakthrough infections in these patients, specifically with phenytoin and efavirenz. Voriconazole is metabolized primarily by CYP2C19, as well as CYP2C9 and CYP3A4. Voriconazole is also known to inhibit these enzymes, and the manufacturer reports an extensive list of drugs that interact with voriconazole.
CONCLUSIONS: Although requiring systematic evaluation, there may be a role for voriconazole serum concentration monitoring to ensure therapeutic efficacy when significant drug interactions are suspected.