Obstetrics and gynecology · 2015
Factitious disorder-by-proxy simulating fetal growth restriction.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jones Trahern W, Delplanche Michelle L, Davies Norman P, Rose Carl H
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Although a variety of presentations have been described in the literature, the true prevalence of factitious disorder, also commonly known as Münchausen syndrome, and factitious disorder-by-proxy in pregnancy is unknown. The authors present a unique case in which intrauterine fetal growth restriction was simulated through fabrication of prenatal records.
CASE: A 30-year-old woman, gravida 6 para 3113, was transferred at 38 4/7 weeks of gestation for severe fetal growth restriction. The clinic listed in the patient-provided prenatal record was contacted to obtain original ultrasonographic reports for verification of gestational age; however, further investigation revealed the patient had never attended this clinic nor was the ostensible treating physician ever employed there. The initial prenatal record subsequently was determined to be entirely fabricated.
CONCLUSION: In this era of extensive technologic resources, health care providers should consider the possibility of factitious disorder when patient-provided medical record-derived information is inconsistent with the clinical presentation.
CASE: A 30-year-old woman, gravida 6 para 3113, was transferred at 38 4/7 weeks of gestation for severe fetal growth restriction. The clinic listed in the patient-provided prenatal record was contacted to obtain original ultrasonographic reports for verification of gestational age; however, further investigation revealed the patient had never attended this clinic nor was the ostensible treating physician ever employed there. The initial prenatal record subsequently was determined to be entirely fabricated.
CONCLUSION: In this era of extensive technologic resources, health care providers should consider the possibility of factitious disorder when patient-provided medical record-derived information is inconsistent with the clinical presentation.