MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2147/cia.s102961

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical interventions in aging · 2017

Dysmobility syndrome: current perspectives.

Hill Keith D, Farrier Kaela, Russell Melissa, Burton Elissa

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

A new term, dysmobility syndrome, has recently been described as a new approach to identify older people at risk of poor health outcomes. The aim was to undertake a systematic review of the existing research literature on dysmobility syndrome.

METHOD: All articles reporting dysmobility syndrome were identified in a systematic review of Medline (Proquest), CINAHL, PubMed, PsycInfo, EMBASE, and Scopus databases. Key characteristics of identified studies were extracted and summarized.

RESULTS

The systematic review identified five papers (three cross-sectional, one case control, and one longitudinal study). No intervention studies were identified. Prevalence of dysmobility syndrome varied between studies (22%-34% in three of the studies). Dysmobility syndrome was shown to be associated with reduced function, increased falls and fractures, and a longitudinal study showed its significant association with mortality.

CONCLUSION

Early research on dysmobility syndrome indicates that it may be a useful classification approach to identify older people at risk of adverse health outcomes and to target for early interventions. Future research needs to standardize the optimal mix of measures and cut points, and investigate whether balance performance may be a more useful factor than history of falls for dysmobility syndrome.

Для цитирования: Hill Keith D, Farrier Kaela, Russell Melissa, Burton Elissa. Dysmobility syndrome: current perspectives.. Clinical interventions in aging. 2017. DOI: 10.2147/cia.s102961.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.