Machine Learning for Prediction of Postoperative Delirium in Adult Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the performance of machine learning (ML) models in predicting postoperative delirium (POD) and to provide guidance for clinical application.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to April 29, 2024. Studies reported ML models for predicting POD in adult patients were included. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed using the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis - AI (TRIPOD-AI) and Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST) tools. Meta-analysis with the area under the curve (AUC) was performed using MedCalc software.

FINDINGS: A total of 23 studies were included after screening. Age (n = 20, 86.95%) and Random Forest (RF) (n = 24, 17.27%) were the most frequently used feature and ML algorithm, respectively. The meta-analysis showed an overall AUC of 0.792. The ensemble models (AUC = 0.805) showed better predictive performance than single models (AUC = 0.782). Additionally, considerable variations in AUC were found among different ML algorithms, with AdaBoost (AB) demonstrating good performance with AUC of 0.870. Notably, the generalizability of these models was uncertain due to limitations in external validation and bias assessment.

IMPLICATIONS: The performance of ensemble models were higher than single models, and the AB algorithms demonstrated better performance, compared with other algorithms. However, further research was needed to enhance the generalizability and transparency of ML models.