In vivo (Athens, Greece) · 2022
In Vivo Analysis of the Immune Response to Strontium- and Copper-doped Bioglass.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Barbeck Mike, Alkildani Said, Mandlule Armando, Radenković Milena, Najman Stevo, Stojanović Sanja, Jung Ole, Ren Yanru, Cai Baoyi, Görke Oliver, Rimashevskiy Denis, Schmidt Franziska
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Bioglass is a highly adoptable bone substitute material which can be combined with so-called therapeutic ions. However, knowledge is poor regarding the influence of therapeutic ions on immune reactions and associated bone healing. Thus, the aim of this work was to investigate the influence of strontium- and copper-doped bioglass on the induction of M1 and M2 macrophages, as well as vascularization.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two types of alkali glass were produced based on ICIE16 bioglass via the melt-quench method with the addition of 5 wt% copper or strontium (ICIE16-Cu and ICIE16-Sr). Pure ICIE16 and 45S5 bioglass were used as control materials. The ion release and chemical composition of the bioglass were investigated, and an in vivo experiment was subcutaneously performed on Sprague-Dawley rats.
RESULTS: Scanning electron microscopy revealed significant differences in the surface morphology of the bioglass materials. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy confirmed the efficiency of the doping process by showing the ion-release kinetics. ICIE16-Cu exhibited a higher ion release than ICIE16-Sr. ICIE16-Cu induced low immune cell migration and triggered not only a low number of M1 and M2 macrophages but also of blood vessels. ICIE16-Sr induced higher numbers of M1 macrophages after 30 days. Both bioglass types induced numbers of M2 macrophages comparable with those found in the control groups.
CONCLUSION: Bioglass doping with copper and strontium did not significantly influence the foreign body response nor vascularization of the implantation bed in vivo. However, all the studied bioglass materials seemed to be biocompatible.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two types of alkali glass were produced based on ICIE16 bioglass via the melt-quench method with the addition of 5 wt% copper or strontium (ICIE16-Cu and ICIE16-Sr). Pure ICIE16 and 45S5 bioglass were used as control materials. The ion release and chemical composition of the bioglass were investigated, and an in vivo experiment was subcutaneously performed on Sprague-Dawley rats.
RESULTS: Scanning electron microscopy revealed significant differences in the surface morphology of the bioglass materials. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy confirmed the efficiency of the doping process by showing the ion-release kinetics. ICIE16-Cu exhibited a higher ion release than ICIE16-Sr. ICIE16-Cu induced low immune cell migration and triggered not only a low number of M1 and M2 macrophages but also of blood vessels. ICIE16-Sr induced higher numbers of M1 macrophages after 30 days. Both bioglass types induced numbers of M2 macrophages comparable with those found in the control groups.
CONCLUSION: Bioglass doping with copper and strontium did not significantly influence the foreign body response nor vascularization of the implantation bed in vivo. However, all the studied bioglass materials seemed to be biocompatible.