MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1155/2012/717163

Медицинская библиотека · Infectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology · 2012

Correlates of dual-method contraceptive use: an analysis of the National Survey Of Family Growth (2006-2008).

Eisenberg David L, Allsworth Jenifer E, Zhao Qiuhong, Peipert Jeffrey F

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To analyze a nationally representative sample of women for correlates of dual-contraceptive-method use.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

We conducted an analysis of the National Survey of Family Growth, 2006-2008, a cross-sectional survey of reproductive-aged women in the United States.

RESULTS

Dual method use was reported by 7.3% of the 5,178 women in the sample. Correlates of higher rates of dual-contraceptive-method use included age younger than 36 years and nonmarried marital status. Lower rates of dual method use were observed for women with less than a high-school education and women without consistent health insurance in the past year. Compared to women using oral contraceptives, use of the contraceptive injection or long-acting reversible contraception was associated with lower dual-method use.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall rate of dual-method use in the USA is low. Future interventions to promote dual method use should target high-risk groups with modifiable risk factors.

Для цитирования: Eisenberg David L, Allsworth Jenifer E, Zhao Qiuhong, Peipert Jeffrey F. Correlates of dual-method contraceptive use: an analysis of the National Survey Of Family Growth (2006-2008).. Infectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology. 2012. DOI: 10.1155/2012/717163.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.