MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ctcp.2020.101154

Медицинская библиотека · Complementary therapies in clinical practice · 2020

Medical cannabis as an alternative therapeutics for Parkinsons' disease: Systematic review.

Bougea Anastasia, Koros Christos, Simitsi Athina-Maria, Chrysovitsanou Chrysa, Leonardos Athanasios, Stefanis Leonidas

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

1) to evaluate the efficacy of medical cannabinoids (MC) by appraising the quality of evidence from clinical studies 2) to explore the factors hampering the MC use in clinical practice of Parkinson's disease (PD).

METHODS

We performed a systematic review through various databases. The quality of 14 studies was assessed by Cochrane risk bias (5 randomized controlled trials- RCT) and Newcastle-Ottawa scale (9 uncontrolled studies).

RESULTS

The positive effects on motor (5 studies) and non-motor symptoms (4 studies) described in uncontrolled studies have not been confirmed by the few and small RCTs. Only one RCT found a reduction of levodopa-induced dyskinesias, another a reduction in anxiety and tremor amplitude in an anxiogenic situation, while the remaining three without effect on motor/non-motor symptoms. Physical and psychological symptoms are among the most common side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to reform international legislation regarding cannabis use in PD practice.

Для цитирования: Bougea Anastasia, Koros Christos, Simitsi Athina-Maria, Chrysovitsanou Chrysa, Leonardos Athanasios, Stefanis Leonidas. Medical cannabis as an alternative therapeutics for Parkinsons' disease: Systematic review.. Complementary therapies in clinical practice. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2020.101154.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.