Deep-Learning Segmentation of Urinary Stones in Noncontrast Computed Tomography.
Аннотация
Background
Noncontrast CT (NCCT) relies on labor-intensive examinations of CT slices to identify urolithiasis in the urinary tract, and, despite the use of deep-learning algorithms, false positives remain. Materials and
Methods
A total of 410 NCCT axial scans from patients undergoing surgical treatment for urolithiasis were used for model development. The deep learning model was customized to combine a urolithiasis segmentation with per-slice classification for screening. Prediction models of the axial, coronal, and sagittal views were trained, and an additive model with an intersection of the coronal and sagittal predictions added to the axial outcome was introduced. Automated quantification of clinical metrics was evaluated in three-dimensional models of urinary stones.
Results
The axial model detected 88.92% of urinary stones and produced a dice similarity coefficient of 87.56% in the urolithiasis segmentation. For urolithiasis (>5 mm), the sensitivity of the axial model reached 95.10%. False positives were reduced to 0.34 per patient using an ensemble of individual models. The additive model improved the sensitivity to 90.97% by detecting more small urolithiasis (<5 mm). All clinical metrics of size, long-axis diameter, volume, mean stone density, stone heterogeneity index, and skin-to-stone distance showed a strong correlation of R2 > 0.964.
Conclusions
The proposed system could reduce the burden on the physician for imaging diagnosis and help determine treatment strategies for urinary stones through automated quantification of clinical metrics with high accuracy and reproducibility.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.