MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1012452

Медицинская библиотека · The New England journal of medicine · 2011

Liberal or restrictive transfusion in high-risk patients after hip surgery.

Carson Jeffrey L, Terrin Michael L, Noveck Helaine, Sanders David W, Chaitman Bernard R, Rhoads George G, Nemo George, Dragert Karen, Beaupre Lauren, Hildebrand Kevin, Macaulay William, Lewis Courtland, Cook Donald Richard, Dobbin Gwendolyn, Zakriya Khwaja J, Apple Fred S, Horney Rebecca A, Magaziner Jay, FOCUS Investigators

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The hemoglobin threshold at which postoperative red-cell transfusion is warranted is controversial. We conducted a randomized trial to determine whether a higher threshold for blood transfusion would improve recovery in patients who had undergone surgery for hip fracture.

METHODS

We enrolled 2016 patients who were 50 years of age or older, who had either a history of or risk factors for cardiovascular disease, and whose hemoglobin level was below 10 g per deciliter after hip-fracture surgery. We randomly assigned patients to a liberal transfusion strategy (a hemoglobin threshold of 10 g per deciliter) or a restrictive transfusion strategy (symptoms of anemia or at physician discretion for a hemoglobin level of <8 g per deciliter). The primary outcome was death or an inability to walk across a room without human assistance on 60-day follow-up.

RESULTS

A median of 2 units of red cells were transfused in the liberal-strategy group and none in the restrictive-strategy group. The rates of the primary outcome were 35.2% in the liberal-strategy group and 34.7% in the restrictive-strategy group (odds ratio in the liberal-strategy group, 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 1.22), for an absolute risk difference of 0.5 percentage points (95% CI, -3.7 to 4.7). The rates of in-hospital acute coronary syndrome or death were 4.3% and 5.2%, respectively (absolute risk difference, -0.9%; 99% CI, -3.3 to 1.6), and rates of death on 60-day follow-up were 7.6% and 6.6%, respectively (absolute risk difference, 1.0%; 99% CI, -1.9 to 4.0). The rates of other complications were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A liberal transfusion strategy, as compared with a restrictive strategy, did not reduce rates of death or inability to walk independently on 60-day follow-up or reduce in-hospital morbidity in elderly patients at high cardiovascular risk. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; FOCUS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00071032.).

Для цитирования: Carson Jeffrey L, Terrin Michael L, Noveck Helaine, Sanders David W, Chaitman Bernard R, Rhoads George G, Nemo George, Dragert Karen, Beaupre Lauren, Hildebrand Kevin, Macaulay William, Lewis Courtland, Cook Donald Richard, Dobbin Gwendolyn, Zakriya Khwaja J, Apple Fred S, Horney Rebecca A, Magaziner Jay, FOCUS Investigators. Liberal or restrictive transfusion in high-risk patients after hip surgery.. The New England journal of medicine. 2011. DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1012452.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.