MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/rct.0000000000000418

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of computer assisted tomography · 2016

Beak-Like Extension of the Pancreatic Uncinate Process on MDCT: Is It Hyperplasia or Movement?

Omeri Ahmad Khalid, Matsumoto Shunro, Kiyonaga Maki, Takaji Ryo, Yamada Yasunari, Mori Hiromu

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the pancreatic uncinate process with a beak-like extension (BLE) beyond the left border of the superior mesenteric artery, to define the cause of BLE, and to differentiate BLE from hyperplasia.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 1042 triple-phase contrast-enhanced multidetector-row computed tomography (3P-CE-MDCT) examinations of 500 patients. Finally, 38 patients (28 men, 10 women; mean age, 66 years) with 140 3P-CE-MDCT images showing BLE were studied regarding BLE size, contour, and cause. The superior mesenteric artery position was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Beak-like extensions were found in 7.6% of patients. Most were caused by movement of the small bowel mesentery (n = 21, 55%), with deviation of mesenteric vessels or mass effect from expanded adjacent organs (n = 3, 8%). Seven patients (18.5%) had true hyperplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

Beak-like extension is caused by movement of the small bowel mesentery with deviation of mesenteric vessels or by adjacent organ expansion. Beak-like extension closely mimics other pathology on nonenhanced MDCT.

Для цитирования: Omeri Ahmad Khalid, Matsumoto Shunro, Kiyonaga Maki, Takaji Ryo, Yamada Yasunari, Mori Hiromu. Beak-Like Extension of the Pancreatic Uncinate Process on MDCT: Is It Hyperplasia or Movement?. Journal of computer assisted tomography. 2016. DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000000418.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.