MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/bja/aex004

Медицинская библиотека · British journal of anaesthesia · 2017

Pulmonary aspiration during procedural sedation: a comprehensive systematic review.

Green S M, Mason K P, Krauss B S

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Although pulmonary aspiration complicating operative general anaesthesia has been extensively studied, little is known regarding aspiration during procedural sedation.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive, systematic review to identify and catalogue published instances of aspiration involving procedural sedation in patients of all ages. We sought to report descriptively the circumstances, nature, and outcomes of these events.

RESULTS

Of 1249 records identified by our search, we found 35 articles describing one or more occurrences of pulmonary aspiration during procedural sedation. Of the 292 occurrences during gastrointestinal endoscopy, there were eight deaths. Of the 34 unique occurrences for procedures other than endoscopy, there was a single death in a moribund patient, full recovery in 31, and unknown recovery status in two. We found no occurrences of aspiration in non-fasted patients receiving procedures other than endoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

This first systematic review of pulmonary aspiration during procedural sedation identified few occurrences outside of gastrointestinal endoscopy, with full recovery typical. Although diligent caution remains warranted, our data indicate that aspiration during procedural sedation appears rare, idiosyncratic, and typically benign.

Для цитирования: Green S M, Mason K P, Krauss B S. Pulmonary aspiration during procedural sedation: a comprehensive systematic review.. British journal of anaesthesia. 2017. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aex004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.