MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/clinids/24.3.457

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 1997

Oral administration of antibiotics: a rational alternative to the parenteral route.

MacGregor R R, Graziani A L

СтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Much early experience with antibiotic therapy involved oral administration of sulfonamides, penicillins, tetracyclines, and chloramphenicol. Newer acid-labile, less-soluble agents created the need for intravenous (i.v.) administration, and i.v. technology (hyporeactive catheter polymers, infusion pumps, etc.) improved to where i.v. administration became normative for the treatment of serious infections. Recently, this preference is being reconsidered in light of agents that are highly effective orally, growing appreciation that i.v. treatment has serious complications, and economic pressures to provide the best care at the lowest cost. This article presents a brief history of administration routes and reviews the rationale for considering oral treatment for serious infections, including consideration of pharmacokinetics and minimum inhibitory concentrations. Published reports supporting the efficacy of orally administered antibiotics either as sole treatment or following an initial parenteral course are reviewed in detail, and examples of programs that educate physicians about the rationale, acceptibility, and benefits of oral administration are given.

Для цитирования: MacGregor R R, Graziani A L. Oral administration of antibiotics: a rational alternative to the parenteral route.. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 1997. DOI: 10.1093/clinids/24.3.457.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.