[The evaluation of the appropriateness of instrumental exams in cardiology. The case of echocardiography].

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the appropriateness and utility rates of echocardiograms performed in 309 patients in an outpatient clinical setting.

METHODS

Data were collected by means of a questionnaire filled in by the cardiologists who performed the examinations. Appropriateness was evaluated according to international guidelines and scored as class I: appropriate, class II: doubtful appropriateness, class III: inappropriate; the exam was deemed useful if it was able to influence the clinical decision-making; normalcy rate was also checked. The relationship between both the referring physicians and motivation of the exam and its appropriateness, and the relationship between appropriateness and both the normalcy rate and utility of the exam were assessed.

RESULTS

An echocardiogram was requested by the cardiologist in 46% of patients; the more common reasons for the exam were arterial hypertension (26%), cardiac murmur (18%), palpitations (15%), and known coronary artery disease (10%). The echocardiogram was appropriate (class I) in 25% of patients, doubtfully appropriate (class II) in 39% of patients and inappropriate (class III) in 36% of patients. The appropriateness rate between the cardiologists was similar to that of other prescribing clinicians (p = NS). The highest class III rate was found in patients with hypertension, while the highest class I rate was found in patients with a cardiac murmur (p < 0.01). Normalcy rate was lower in class I than in class II and III exams (p < 0.001). The utility rate was higher in class I (76%) than in class II (13%) and III (< 1%) exams (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

International guidelines can be used effectively and safely to identify (not to prescribe) the useless echocardiograms.