MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2967/jnumed.124.269431

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025

Evidence-Based Clinical Protocols to Monitor Efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA Radiopharmaceutical Therapy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Using Real-World Data.

Unterrainer Lena M, De Leiris Nicolas, Unterrainer Marcus, Delker Astrid, Hempel Linus, Ells Zachary, Kunte Sophie C, Zahner Josef, Holzgreve Adrien, Zacherl Mathias J, Sheikh Gabriel T, Casuscelli Jozefina, Leenhardt Julien, Pienta Kenneth J, Jacquet Emmanuelle, Laramas Mathieu, Long Jerome, Faure Marine, Reboulet Ghislaine, Paller Channing J, Mercier Alexis, Solnes Lilja B, Kiraz Kevin, Ilhan Harun, Gafita Andrei, Djaileb Loïc

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Our objectives were to assess the prognostic value of posttherapy [177Lu]Lu-PSMA (LuPSMA) SPECT/CT by visual evaluation using RECIP 1.0 during LuPSMA therapy and develop an evidence-based clinical protocol to monitor the efficacy of LuPSMA.

Methods

Patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who received at least 2 LuPSMA cycles between April 2019 and November 2023 were retrospectively included in this study. Pairs of baseline and interim LuPSMA SPECT/CT (SPECT) and PSMA PET/CT (PET) images after 2 therapy cycles were analyzed per visual RECIP 1.0. Changes in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels at 12 wk were categorized by Prostate Cancer Working Group Criteria 3 guidelines and combined with RECIP 1.0 reads to determine disease progression using a composite classification method (PSA + RECIP). The primary outcome was the prognostic value of posttherapeutic SPECT by RECIP 1.0 for overall survival (OS). The clinical protocol was developed on the basis of the prognostic accuracy (Harrell concordance index, or C-index) of SPECT versus PET and the combination of SPECT plus PSA (SPECT + PSA) versus the combination of PET plus PSA (PET + PSA).

Results

Data from 105 patients were evaluated. Progressive disease determined by SPECT was associated with shorter OS compared with stable disease (hazard ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.2-5.3; P = 0.015) and with partial response (hazard ratio, 6.5; 95% CI, 2.7-15.7; P < 0.001). Of the 73 patients who underwent PET after 2 cycles, 7 (10%), 30 (41%), 22 (30%), and 30 (41%) had tumor progression shown by SPECT, PET, SPECT + PSA, and PET + PSA, respectively. The C-index for SPECT was inferior compared with that for PET (0.54 vs. 0.66; P < 0.001), whereas the C-indices for SPECT + PSA and PET + PSA did not differ significantly (0.62 vs. 0.66, respectively; P = 0.07).

Conclusion

Posttherapeutic LuPSMA SPECT/CT per RECIP 1.0 after 2 therapy cycles was prognostic for OS. LuPSMA SPECT/CT identified significantly fewer patients with RECIP-classified progressive disease; however, SPECT + PSA achieved similar prognostic accuracy to PET + PSA for LuPSMA response evaluation.

Для цитирования: Unterrainer Lena M, De Leiris Nicolas, Unterrainer Marcus, Delker Astrid, Hempel Linus, Ells Zachary, Kunte Sophie C, Zahner Josef, Holzgreve Adrien, Zacherl Mathias J, Sheikh Gabriel T, Casuscelli Jozefina, Leenhardt Julien, Pienta Kenneth J, Jacquet Emmanuelle, Laramas Mathieu, Long Jerome, Faure Marine, Reboulet Ghislaine, Paller Channing J, Mercier Alexis, Solnes Lilja B, Kiraz Kevin, Ilhan Harun, Gafita Andrei, Djaileb Loïc. Evidence-Based Clinical Protocols to Monitor Efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA Radiopharmaceutical Therapy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Using Real-World Data.. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.269431.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.