Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960) · 2011
Splenic vein-inferior mesenteric vein anastomosis to lessen left-sided portal hypertension after pancreaticoduodenectomy with concomitant vascular resection.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ferreira Nélio, Oussoultzoglou Elie, Fuchshuber Pascal, Ntourakis Dimitrios, Narita Masato, Rather Mudassir, Rosso Edoardo, Addeo Pietro, Pessaux Patrick, Jaeck Daniel, Bachellier Philippe
Аннотация
HYPOTHESIS: A splenic vein (SV)-inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) anastomosis reduces congestion of the stomach and spleen after pancreaticoduodenectomy with resection of the SV-mesenteric vein confluence but carries a risk of left-sided venous hypertension.
DESIGN: Comparative retrospective study.
SETTING: Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
PATIENTS: From January 1, 2002, to February 28, 2010, 39 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with resection of the SV-mesenteric vein confluence for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. All patients had a terminoterminal portal vein-superior mesenteric vein anastomosis. The SV blood flow into the portal vein was preserved in 11 patients by reimplantation of the SV into the portal vein. Sixteen patients underwent surgical reconstruction of the SV-IMV confluence by anastomosis (group 1), and in 12 patients the natural SV-IMV confluence was preserved (group 2).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative and postoperative spleen volume and platelet count.
RESULTS: Demographic characteristics, preoperative tumor staging, pathological outcome, and postoperative complications were comparable in both groups. There was no difference in platelet count between groups 1 and 2 preoperatively (mean [SD], 293.13 [125.37] vs 241.09 [49.12] × 10(3)/μL [to convert to × 10(9)/L, multiply by 1.0], respectively; P = .21) or postoperatively (mean [SD], 231.75 [156.39] vs 164.31 [76.46] × 10(3)/μL, respectively; P = .32). Likewise, no difference was found in the spleen volume preoperatively (mean [SD], 258.96 [179.23] vs 237.31 [122.46] mL, respectively; P = .76) and on postoperative day 15 (mean [SD], 279.08 [158.10] vs 299.12 [153.11] mL, respectively; P = .78).
CONCLUSION: Early assessment shows that SV-IMV anastomosis is as feasible and as safe as the preservation of a natural SV-IMV confluence in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma.
DESIGN: Comparative retrospective study.
SETTING: Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
PATIENTS: From January 1, 2002, to February 28, 2010, 39 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with resection of the SV-mesenteric vein confluence for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. All patients had a terminoterminal portal vein-superior mesenteric vein anastomosis. The SV blood flow into the portal vein was preserved in 11 patients by reimplantation of the SV into the portal vein. Sixteen patients underwent surgical reconstruction of the SV-IMV confluence by anastomosis (group 1), and in 12 patients the natural SV-IMV confluence was preserved (group 2).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative and postoperative spleen volume and platelet count.
RESULTS: Demographic characteristics, preoperative tumor staging, pathological outcome, and postoperative complications were comparable in both groups. There was no difference in platelet count between groups 1 and 2 preoperatively (mean [SD], 293.13 [125.37] vs 241.09 [49.12] × 10(3)/μL [to convert to × 10(9)/L, multiply by 1.0], respectively; P = .21) or postoperatively (mean [SD], 231.75 [156.39] vs 164.31 [76.46] × 10(3)/μL, respectively; P = .32). Likewise, no difference was found in the spleen volume preoperatively (mean [SD], 258.96 [179.23] vs 237.31 [122.46] mL, respectively; P = .76) and on postoperative day 15 (mean [SD], 279.08 [158.10] vs 299.12 [153.11] mL, respectively; P = .78).
CONCLUSION: Early assessment shows that SV-IMV anastomosis is as feasible and as safe as the preservation of a natural SV-IMV confluence in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnastomosis, SurgicalFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansHypertension, PortalHypertrophyMaleMesenteric VeinsMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOrgan SizePancreatic NeoplasmsPancreaticoduodenectomyPlatelet CountPortal VeinPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesSpleenSplenic VeinTomography, X-Ray Computed