The British journal of radiology · 2026
Demographic factors associated with differential uptake and outcomes of breast cancer screening in English regions: 2007-2020.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Oliver-Williams Clare, Choglay Sameer, Ahmed Shahjalal, Hudson Sue, Wilkinson Louise, Bichbiche Khadidja
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer among UK women. Screening aims to detect cancer early, improving treatment options, and survival. However, participation varies across England with lower participation and cancer detection rates in London than other regions. We postulate that demographic factors (age, ethnicity, deprivation, and migration) might explain some regional differences.
METHODS: An ecological analysis of aggregated data compared English regions (April 2007-March 2020). Primary outcomes were breast cancer mortality, coverage rate, and rate of screen-detected invasive cancers. Linear regression analyses compared outcomes between London and other English regions, adjusting for age, ethnicity, deprivation, and migration.
RESULTS: Data included 104 observations aggregated from 26 202 645 screenings, of which 11.9% were in London. Coverage was lower in London (67.8%) than other English regions (73.6%-79.8%). London had significantly lower rates of screen-detected invasive cancers (mean= 6.2 per 1000, SD = 0.2) compared to 6 of 7 regions (ranging from 6.3 to 6.9 per 1000) and lower breast cancer mortality rate (mean = 31.7, SD = 0.8) than 4 regions (ranging from 33.4 to 36.1). Differences in coverage were attenuated and non-significant after adjustment for demographic factors.
CONCLUSIONS: Regional differences in screening participation are associated with demographic factors, but breast cancer outcomes in London are not worse than the rest of England. Targeted interventions to improve screening accessibility for underserved communities could reduce inequalities. We describe challenges associated with combining several sources of information when performing our analyses and further research using individual-level data is recommended to confirm results and explore additional predictors.
ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This national ecological analysis demonstrates that lower breast screening coverage and invasive cancer detection rates in London are associated with demographic factors, particularly ethnicity, deprivation, and migration. Despite poorer participation, breast cancer mortality in London is not worse than in other English regions. The findings emphasize the importance of demographic factors in breast screening outcomes and improved data linkage to address regional inequalities in breast cancer screening and outcomes.
METHODS: An ecological analysis of aggregated data compared English regions (April 2007-March 2020). Primary outcomes were breast cancer mortality, coverage rate, and rate of screen-detected invasive cancers. Linear regression analyses compared outcomes between London and other English regions, adjusting for age, ethnicity, deprivation, and migration.
RESULTS: Data included 104 observations aggregated from 26 202 645 screenings, of which 11.9% were in London. Coverage was lower in London (67.8%) than other English regions (73.6%-79.8%). London had significantly lower rates of screen-detected invasive cancers (mean= 6.2 per 1000, SD = 0.2) compared to 6 of 7 regions (ranging from 6.3 to 6.9 per 1000) and lower breast cancer mortality rate (mean = 31.7, SD = 0.8) than 4 regions (ranging from 33.4 to 36.1). Differences in coverage were attenuated and non-significant after adjustment for demographic factors.
CONCLUSIONS: Regional differences in screening participation are associated with demographic factors, but breast cancer outcomes in London are not worse than the rest of England. Targeted interventions to improve screening accessibility for underserved communities could reduce inequalities. We describe challenges associated with combining several sources of information when performing our analyses and further research using individual-level data is recommended to confirm results and explore additional predictors.
ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This national ecological analysis demonstrates that lower breast screening coverage and invasive cancer detection rates in London are associated with demographic factors, particularly ethnicity, deprivation, and migration. Despite poorer participation, breast cancer mortality in London is not worse than in other English regions. The findings emphasize the importance of demographic factors in breast screening outcomes and improved data linkage to address regional inequalities in breast cancer screening and outcomes.