Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2001
The use of renal Doppler ultrasonography to diagnose patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Armstrong D L, Teele R L, Kuschel C A, Harding J E
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To prospectively study the diagnostic usefulness of altered renal waveforms in patent ductus arteriosus.
METHODS: We studied preterm infants undergoing echocardiography for a suspected patent ductus arteriosus. A spectral Doppler display was acquired for both renal arteries, and a resistive index was obtained. Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios were calculated using a clinically significant patent ductus arteriosus (>1.5-mm diameter on color Doppler ultrasonography) as the standard of reference.
RESULTS: Fifty infants had 78 scans. A significant patent ductus arteriosus was present on 39 scans. When the renal resistive index was greater than 1.0, the likelihood ratio for a significant patent ductus arteriosus was 24.8 (specificity, 97.2%; SD, 3.8%). When the renal resistive index was 1.0 or less, the likelihood ratio for a significant patent ductus arteriosus was 0.2 (sensitivity, 77.2%; SD, 9.4%).
CONCLUSIONS: Renal resistive index measurement is a simple investigation that can predict a significant patent ductus arteriosus in patients without congenital heart disease or other causes of diastolic runoff when echocardiography is unavailable.
METHODS: We studied preterm infants undergoing echocardiography for a suspected patent ductus arteriosus. A spectral Doppler display was acquired for both renal arteries, and a resistive index was obtained. Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios were calculated using a clinically significant patent ductus arteriosus (>1.5-mm diameter on color Doppler ultrasonography) as the standard of reference.
RESULTS: Fifty infants had 78 scans. A significant patent ductus arteriosus was present on 39 scans. When the renal resistive index was greater than 1.0, the likelihood ratio for a significant patent ductus arteriosus was 24.8 (specificity, 97.2%; SD, 3.8%). When the renal resistive index was 1.0 or less, the likelihood ratio for a significant patent ductus arteriosus was 0.2 (sensitivity, 77.2%; SD, 9.4%).
CONCLUSIONS: Renal resistive index measurement is a simple investigation that can predict a significant patent ductus arteriosus in patients without congenital heart disease or other causes of diastolic runoff when echocardiography is unavailable.