Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2018
Antegrade-transseptal approach for left ventricular tachyarrhythmia in patients with previous Mitraclip implantation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hayashi Kentaro, Heeger Christian-H, Mathew Shibu, Maurer Tilman, Lemes Christine, Riedl Johannes, Reißmann Bruno, Frerker Christian, Geidel Stephan, Schmoeckel Michael, Saguner Ardan M, Santoro Francesco, Tilz Roland Richard, Metzner Andreas, Kuck Karl-Heinz, Ouyang Feifan
Аннотация
AIMS: Antegrade-transseptal approach to treat left ventricular tachyarrhythmia (LVT) is useful and widespread. Meanwhile, Mitraclip has been recently introduced as an alternative to mitral valve surgery for severe mitral regurgitation, usually coexisting with ventricular arrhythmias. However, data on the antegrade approach for mapping and ablating LVT in these patients are insufficient. We evaluated the feasibility and clinical impact of the antegrade approach for LVT after Mitraclip implantation.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We included five patients (all men; age 72.6 ± 10.5 years) with Mitraclip implantation who underwent catheter ablation for LVT and employed the antegrade approach. Post-ablation mitral valve function was systematically evaluated by transthoracic echocardiography. Six procedures with the antegrade approach were performed on the five patients; three of these patients developed electrical storm. The number of implanted Mitraclip was 1 in two patients, 2 in two patients, and 3 in one patient, for a mean duration of 417 ± 324 days before ablation. After 117-day median follow-up, there was no recurrence of electrical storm, but ventricular tachyarrhythmia recurred and required implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in one patient (only sporadic anti-tachycardia pacing); two patients died because of reasons other than ventricular arrhythmia. There was no procedure-related injury on the mitral valve immediately and 3 months after ablation.
CONCLUSIONS: Antegrade ablation of LVT after Mitraclip implantation may be feasible. Non-arrhythmic death during follow-up suggested the need for comprehensive evaluation before and after ablation.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We included five patients (all men; age 72.6 ± 10.5 years) with Mitraclip implantation who underwent catheter ablation for LVT and employed the antegrade approach. Post-ablation mitral valve function was systematically evaluated by transthoracic echocardiography. Six procedures with the antegrade approach were performed on the five patients; three of these patients developed electrical storm. The number of implanted Mitraclip was 1 in two patients, 2 in two patients, and 3 in one patient, for a mean duration of 417 ± 324 days before ablation. After 117-day median follow-up, there was no recurrence of electrical storm, but ventricular tachyarrhythmia recurred and required implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in one patient (only sporadic anti-tachycardia pacing); two patients died because of reasons other than ventricular arrhythmia. There was no procedure-related injury on the mitral valve immediately and 3 months after ablation.
CONCLUSIONS: Antegrade ablation of LVT after Mitraclip implantation may be feasible. Non-arrhythmic death during follow-up suggested the need for comprehensive evaluation before and after ablation.