DOI 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.05.008
Probe ablation as salvage therapy for renal tumors in von Hippel-Lindau patients: the Cleveland Clinic experience with 3 years follow-up.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of probe ablative therapy as salvage treatment for renal tumor in von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) patients after previous partial nephrectomy (PN).
METHODS
Medical records of VHL patients undergoing probe ablative treatment for renal tumors from March 2003 to January 2010 at our institution were retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS
Fourteen VHL patients who were submitted to salvage probe ablative therapy were included in the analysis. Twelve patients (85%) had a solitary kidney. Overall, 33 tumors were ablated by either percutaneous cryoablation (P-Cryo) (n of procedures = 13), radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (n = 14), and laparoscopic cryoablation (L-Cryo) (n = 3). Average maximal renal tumor diameter was 2.6 ± 1 cm. Average ablation time was 18.3 ± 2.1 minutes for P-Cryo, 36.7 ± 17 minutes for RFA, and 17.3 ± 4 minutes for L-Cryo. All procedures were successfully completed without transfusions and intraoperative complications. No early postoperative complications were recorded. Postoperative decline in renal function was minimal and not clinically significant. With a mean follow-up of 37.6 months (range 12-82), 4 patients had a suspicious recurrence on computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) scan and in 3 of them a re-ablation was performed. Actuarial overall and cancer-specific survivals were 92% and 100%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Probe ablative therapy seems to represent a suitable treatment option for VHL patients with a previous history of PN as it offers a repeatable operation, with a high technical success rate and causing minor changes in renal function.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.