Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics · 2005
Evaluation of minipigs as an animal model for alveolar distraction.
Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Martínez-González José María, Cano-Sánchez Jorge, Campo-Trapero Julián, Gonzalo-Lafuente Juan Carlos, Díaz-Regañón Jesús, Vázquez-Piñeiro María Teresa
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Alveolar distraction osteogenesis is a relatively novel tissue regeneration technique that remains, in some respects, at an experimental stage. The selection of an experimental animal biomodel is not clearly defined, with reports in the reviewed literature on dogs, sheep, and monkeys. The present objective was to compare 2 experimental biomodels (dog and minipig) using an alveolar distraction protocol with a novel prototype distractor.
STUDY DESIGN: Three beagle dogs and 3 Göttingen minipigs were evaluated, placing the distractor at the right hemimandible alveolar ridge after previous extraction of premolars. The radiological examination was carried out immediately after the distraction and at 2 weeks of consolidation.
RESULTS: Satisfactory clinical and radiological results were obtained in 2 of 3 beagle dogs after the previous unilateral extraction of mandibular and maxillary premolars. During the consolidation, a height gain of approximately 5 mm was observed, with the appearance of radiodense bone trabeculae in the distraction chamber. The distraction failed in all of the minipigs.
CONCLUSION: The minipig was not an appropriate biomodel for the study of alveolar distraction because the investigators were not able to maintain the seal of the distraction chamber or the stability of the distractor.
STUDY DESIGN: Three beagle dogs and 3 Göttingen minipigs were evaluated, placing the distractor at the right hemimandible alveolar ridge after previous extraction of premolars. The radiological examination was carried out immediately after the distraction and at 2 weeks of consolidation.
RESULTS: Satisfactory clinical and radiological results were obtained in 2 of 3 beagle dogs after the previous unilateral extraction of mandibular and maxillary premolars. During the consolidation, a height gain of approximately 5 mm was observed, with the appearance of radiodense bone trabeculae in the distraction chamber. The distraction failed in all of the minipigs.
CONCLUSION: The minipig was not an appropriate biomodel for the study of alveolar distraction because the investigators were not able to maintain the seal of the distraction chamber or the stability of the distractor.