Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy · 2022
Outcomes of early-start peritoneal dialysis (PD) and the comparison with urgent-start hemodialysis and conventional-start PD.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yeter Hasan Haci, Izgi Aybuke, Yildirim Saliha, Akcay Omer Faruk, Derici Ulver
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Limited data in the literature is comparing early-start peritoneal dialysis (PD), urgent-start hemodialysis (HD) with the jugular central venous catheter (CVC), and conventional-start PD.
METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted with 148 patients with early-start PD, 104 patients with conventional-start PD, and 100 patients with urgent-start HD. Early-start PD was defined as catheter break-in time between 3 and 14 days.
RESULTS: The occurrence of dialysate-leakage was similar between PD groups (p = 0.1). Bleeding at the catheter site was detected in 8 (2.3%) patients with CVC. There was no significant difference in catheter dysfunction and revision. PD groups had statistically similar peritonitis rates (p = 0.5). 19% (19/100) of patients suffered CVC-related bloodstream infection and one patient died due to septic shock. Technique survival was significantly higher at early-start PD than the conventional-start PD at 6 months (p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: Initiating early-start PD is comparable with conventional-start PD, and it may be an alternative dialysis modality to avoid bloodstream infections in suitable patients.
METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted with 148 patients with early-start PD, 104 patients with conventional-start PD, and 100 patients with urgent-start HD. Early-start PD was defined as catheter break-in time between 3 and 14 days.
RESULTS: The occurrence of dialysate-leakage was similar between PD groups (p = 0.1). Bleeding at the catheter site was detected in 8 (2.3%) patients with CVC. There was no significant difference in catheter dysfunction and revision. PD groups had statistically similar peritonitis rates (p = 0.5). 19% (19/100) of patients suffered CVC-related bloodstream infection and one patient died due to septic shock. Technique survival was significantly higher at early-start PD than the conventional-start PD at 6 months (p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: Initiating early-start PD is comparable with conventional-start PD, and it may be an alternative dialysis modality to avoid bloodstream infections in suitable patients.