American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics · 2021
Dronabinol inhibits alveolar bone remodeling in tooth movement of rats.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Klein Katherine P, Guastaldi Fernando P S, Pereira Halissa S G, He Yan, Lukas Scott E
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Orthodontic tooth movement is reliant on the process of bone remodeling, and a variety of medications impact the ability of teeth to move through bone. Marijuana is the most widely used recreational drug in the world, and early studies suggest the drug impacts bone remodeling as tetrahydrocannabinol binds to cannabinoid receptors which play a role in bone homeostasis. This study aimed to assess the impact of dronabinol on alveolar bone remodeling in rats with otherwise healthy tissue when subjected to orthodontic forces.
METHODS: Thirty male Sprague Dawley rats were equally allocated into 2 groups. Orthodontic appliances were placed in all animals, which consisted of a nickel-titanium coil ligated from the maxillary first molar to the central incisor. The appliance was activated to deliver a force to move teeth together. Over 21 days, daily injections of either dronabinol or the control (solvent) were given to the rats. Cephalometric analysis, histology, and bone remodeling profiles of both groups were analyzed and compared.
RESULTS: Teeth moved in both the dronabinol and control groups (P <0.05). Tooth movement in the control group followed the typical process of orthodontic tooth movement: periodontal width narrowing and bone resorption on the compression side of the tooth, with an overall decrease in the height of the alveolar bone. In contrast, the dronabinol group showed an abnormal response to tooth movement: no bone resorption on the compression side of the tooth, increased bone formation on the tension side, and the maintenance of the height of the alveolar crest. In the dronabinol group, there were also significantly more osteoclasts and osteoblasts in the alveolar bone than in the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that dronabinol attenuates orthodontic tooth movement by decreasing bone resorption, which could have implications for other bone-related recovery processes.
METHODS: Thirty male Sprague Dawley rats were equally allocated into 2 groups. Orthodontic appliances were placed in all animals, which consisted of a nickel-titanium coil ligated from the maxillary first molar to the central incisor. The appliance was activated to deliver a force to move teeth together. Over 21 days, daily injections of either dronabinol or the control (solvent) were given to the rats. Cephalometric analysis, histology, and bone remodeling profiles of both groups were analyzed and compared.
RESULTS: Teeth moved in both the dronabinol and control groups (P <0.05). Tooth movement in the control group followed the typical process of orthodontic tooth movement: periodontal width narrowing and bone resorption on the compression side of the tooth, with an overall decrease in the height of the alveolar bone. In contrast, the dronabinol group showed an abnormal response to tooth movement: no bone resorption on the compression side of the tooth, increased bone formation on the tension side, and the maintenance of the height of the alveolar crest. In the dronabinol group, there were also significantly more osteoclasts and osteoblasts in the alveolar bone than in the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that dronabinol attenuates orthodontic tooth movement by decreasing bone resorption, which could have implications for other bone-related recovery processes.