DOI 10.1097/inf.0000000000002552
The Cerebrospinal Fluid Interleukin-6/Interleukin-10 Ratio Differentiates Pediatric Tick-borne Infections.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Borrelia burgdorferi and tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) virus are 2 types of tick-borne pathogens that can cause central nervous system infection. Routine diagnostics have so far included analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cell numbers, CSF serology for Borrelia burgdorferi and serum serology for TBE virus. However, early diagnosis may be difficult based on antibody detection which takes time to analyze, and with the possibility of false negative results, thus delaying treatment. Cytokine analyses are becoming increasingly available in clinical routine care and may offer important information.
METHODS
Fifteen cytokines and chemokines were measured in the CSF from the diagnostic lumbar puncture of 37 children with TBE, 34 children with neuroborreliosis and 19 children without evidence of central nervous system infection, using Luminex technology.
RESULTS
Significantly higher levels of proinflammatory interleukin-6 were detected in the samples from TBE-infected children, when compared with neuroborreliosis or controls. In comparison, children with neuroborreliosis had significantly higher levels of interleukin-7, interleukin-8, interleukin-10, and interleukin-13 when compared with TBE infected or controls. Furthermore, the ratio between interleukin-6 and interleukin-10 was significantly different between the 2 types of tick-borne infections.
CONCLUSIONS
The interleukin-6/interleukin-10 ratio can be used as a rapid diagnostic cue upon suspected tick-borne infection, enabling fast and correct treatment. Also, in serology-negative results, such information may strengthen a clinical suspicion.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.