Brain injury · 2024
Effects of preinjury oral anticoagulants on the outcomes of traumatic brain injury in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Систематический обзорМетаанализСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Karamian Armin, Seifi Ali, Lucke-Wold Brandon
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: With the increasing cases of TBI cases in the elderly population taking anticoagulants for comorbidities, there is a need to better understand the safety of new anticoagulants and how to manage anticoagulated TBI patients.
METHODS: A meta-analysis using a random-effect model was conducted to compare the effect of preinjury use of DOACs and VKAs on the outcomes following TBI.
RESULTS: From 1951 studies, 49 studies with a total sample size of 15,180 met our inclusion criteria. Our meta-analysis showed no difference between preinjury use of DOACs or VKAs on ICH progression, in-hospital delayed ICH, delayed ICH at follow-up, and in-hospital mortality, but using DOACs was associated with a lower risk of immediate ICH (OR = 0.58; 95% CI = [0.42; 0.79]; p < 0.01) and neurosurgical interventions (OR = 0.59; 95% CI = [0.42; 0.82]; p < 0.01) compared to VKAs. Moreover, patients on DOACs experienced shorter length of stay in the hospital than those on VKAs (OR = -0.42; 95% CI = [-0.78; -0.07]; p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: We found a lower risk of immediate ICH and surgical interventions as well as a shorter hospital stay in patients receiving DOACs compared to VKA users before the head injury.
METHODS: A meta-analysis using a random-effect model was conducted to compare the effect of preinjury use of DOACs and VKAs on the outcomes following TBI.
RESULTS: From 1951 studies, 49 studies with a total sample size of 15,180 met our inclusion criteria. Our meta-analysis showed no difference between preinjury use of DOACs or VKAs on ICH progression, in-hospital delayed ICH, delayed ICH at follow-up, and in-hospital mortality, but using DOACs was associated with a lower risk of immediate ICH (OR = 0.58; 95% CI = [0.42; 0.79]; p < 0.01) and neurosurgical interventions (OR = 0.59; 95% CI = [0.42; 0.82]; p < 0.01) compared to VKAs. Moreover, patients on DOACs experienced shorter length of stay in the hospital than those on VKAs (OR = -0.42; 95% CI = [-0.78; -0.07]; p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: We found a lower risk of immediate ICH and surgical interventions as well as a shorter hospital stay in patients receiving DOACs compared to VKA users before the head injury.