Glutathione Transferase P1-1 an Enzyme Useful in Biomedicine and as Biomarker in Clinical Practice and in Environmental Pollution.

1. Introduction

Glutathione transferases (GSTs) represent a superfamily of multifunctional proteins expressed in almost all eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells, able to detoxify against endogenous and exogenous toxic compounds [ 1 , 2 ]. In mammalian organisms, they are grouped into three major families: cytosolic GSTs, mitochondrial GSTs, and microsomal GSTs [ 1 ]. Many different gene-independent classes represent the cytosolic GSTs; each group of GST isoenzymes presents similar sequences and structural properties. For example, in humans and mammals, seven classes are present i.e., Alpha, Mu, Pi, Theta, Omega, Sigma, and Zeta. While the Alpha class collects A1-1, A2-2, A3-3, A4-4 isoenzymes, the Pi class only contains one enzyme, the GSTP1-1 [ 2 ].

These enzymes were discovered about sixty years ago [ 3 ]. Since then many studies defined structural and catalytic properties of various isoenzymes. All cytosolic GSTs are dimeric proteins that display similar tridimensional structures despite low sequence identity. Each monomer contains a binding site for glutathione (GSH) (G-site) and a second binding site for hydrophobic toxic compounds (H-site) ( Figure 1 ) [ 4 ].

Three distinct GST subfamilies can be described on the basis of different protein residues able to activate GSH forcing its deprotonation: Cys-, Ser- and Tyr-based GSTs ( Figure 2 ) [ 6 ].

These enzymes, in fact, catalyze the nucleophilic attack of GSH to the electrophilic center of many toxic compounds with very different chemical structures ( Figure 3 ).

Some specific isoenzymes also display an additional selenium-independent peroxidase catalytic activity [ 11 ]. These enzymes may act as ligandins by binding and inactivating a variety of toxic compounds and peptides [ 4 ]. GSTs are also involved in the detoxification of a natural nitric oxide (NO) derivative, the dinitrosyl-diglutathionyl-iron complex (DNDGIC), a toxic compound which is formed in the cell in case of NO insults which becomes harmful when bound to GST ( Figure 4 ) [ 6 ].

By considering that GSTs present in the cytosol of the mammalian cells account for about 5%–8% of all soluble proteins, they represent the most prominent defense line (Phase II) able to biotransform xenobiotics via enzymatic activity or to sweep dangerous toxins by binding them and promoting their extrusion from the cell ( Figure 5 ) [ 13 ].

Interestingly, GSTs reach a 0.5–0.8 mM concentration in the cell so it works in vivo under the unusual conditions of [xenobiotic] << [GST]. As GST lowers the p K a of GSH bound to the active site, it increases the concentration of deprotonated GSH in the cytosol by about five times thus accelerating its conjugation with toxins even if they are not typical substrates of this enzyme [ 13 ]. This catalysis becomes more evident in the case of cell acidification and GSH depletion [ 13 ]. The peculiar enzymatic conjugation of GSH to these toxic compounds is possible assuming a simple bimolecular collision between enzyme and substrate [ 13 ].

1.1. The Erythrocyte GSTP1-1 (e-GST)

The GSTP1-1 is present in many mammalian tissues including brain, heart, lung, testis, skin kidney, and pancreas. GSTP1-1 is also the most abundant intra-erythrocyte isoenzyme representing 95% of the entire GST pool [ 14 ]. Its x-ray structure was solved in our laboratory in collaboration with Parker and coworkers ( Figure 1 ). Our group also studied its catalytic mechanism and defined many interesting structural and functional properties. This dimeric protein is composed of two identical subunits of about 23 kDa. Each subunit can be divided into two domains. The amino-terminal Domain I contains the binding site for GSH (G-site), and the carboxy-terminal Domain II is able to bind many different toxic compounds in a hydrophobic cavity (H-site). This enzyme also displays four cysteines, which do not form disulfide bridges. It follows a Michaelian behavior with a rapid equilibrium random sequential Bi-Bi mechanism [ 15 ]. Therefore, for many years this enzyme was considered a dimer with two structurally and kinetically independent G-sites. However, the replacement of Cys47 with alanine or serine decreased the affinity for GSH and triggered positive cooperativity for the binding of GSH [ 16 ]. This finding indicated a structural communication between subunits caused by the lack of a particular electrostatic bond between Cys47 and the protonated amino group of Lys54. The importance of Cys47 and its particular properties were also explored by means of simulated electrostatic potential measurements, which gave an unusual and very low p K a of 3.5 [ 17 ].

The reactivity of this residue has been also used to probe the flexibility of helix-2, whose motions modulate both the affinity of G-site for GSH and the homotropic behavior of GSH in the mutated enzyme. Another residue, Tyr108, has been found to have a multifunctional action in the catalytic mechanism, depending on the nature of the electrophilic co-substrate [ 18 ]. A few other studies have been made to define the structure of GSH when bound to the G-site [ 19 ], and the crystal structure of GSTP1-1 in complex with various inhibitors [ 5 ]. A very interesting property of this enzyme is its kinetic and binding behavior at different temperatures. In fact, above 35 °C the binding of GSH to GSTP1-1 displays positive cooperativity, whereas negative cooperativity occurs below 25 °C. This mechanism minimizes changes of GSH affinity for the G-site because of temperature fluctuations [ 20 ]. This is an advantage for epithelial cells, rich in GSTP1-1 and exposed to temperature changes.

Other studies confirmed latent cooperativity in GSTP1-1 disclosed by the mutation of Gly41 and Gly50 [ 21 ]. More recent investigations discovered the involvement of GSTP1-1 in the storage and detoxification of NO. In fact, it was found that both S-nitrosoglutathione and the dinitrosy-diglutathionyl-iron complex, two well-known NO carriers, may bind and interact with GSTP1-1 [ 22 ]. In particular, the free DNDGIC is a toxic compound because it irreversibly inactivates glutathione reductase (GR) [ 23 ]. This complex binds with extraordinary affinity to the G-site ( K d = 10 −9 M) and when bound to the G-site it becomes fully harmful. However, by means of negative cooperativity, when one subunit of the enzyme has bound DNDGIC, the other free subunit becomes unable to bind a second molecule [ 24 ]. This mechanism preserves GSTP1-1 from complete inactivation when it is involved in the DNDGIC detoxification, maintaining its classical conjugating activity even when an excess of NO is produced in the cell. This particular self-preservation has been also found also in other GST isoenzymes like the Alpha and Mu GSTs but not in bacterial GSTs, suggesting that this property has been acquired only in the more recently evolved organisms [ 25 ].

The property of GSTP1-1 to act as a ligandin can be extended in a certain way to the protein-protein interactions where this enzyme is involved in controlling signaling pathways and transcriptional responses of cells. The apoptotic signaling of Jun-kinase [ 26 ] and Bax [ 27 ] is under the influence of this interaction. GSTs also modulate calcium channels, decreasing the apoptotic mobilization of calcium ions [ 28 ]. Interactions of GSTP in the apoptosis include tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), TNF-receptor factor 2 (TRAF2) and the apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 [ 29 ]. The activity of Peroxiredoxin-6 is also controlled in a redox-dependent manner by the interaction with GSTP, and evidence has been obtained on the existence of GSTP-dependent feedback of Nrf2 transcription factor activity [ 30 ]. GSTP1-1 is not only found inside the cell involved in the detoxification mechanisms and/or signal transduction pathways but it is also present in human fluids like saliva. In fact, GSTP1-1 represents the most abundant salivary GST isoenzyme, but it is present as an inactive oxidized form with two of its four cysteines linked as an intramolecular disulfide. The salivary hypothiocyanite is the main responsible for its inactivation [ 31 ]. Saliva remains the only biological compartment where GSTP1-1 has been recovered as an inactive oxidized protein.

1.2. GSTP1-1 in Blood

Serum only contains traces of GSTP1-1 (and other GSTs isoenzymes) [ 32 ]. Conversely, erythrocytes contain detectable amounts of GSTP1-1 (defined e-GST). Its normal concentration in humans corresponds to around 6 U/g Hb.

This enzyme appears to be inducible, i.e., its expression is modulated by levels of circulating toxins, and therefore, it represents a possible useful biomarker to verify the blood toxicity in all diseases associated with depurative organ dysfunction such as liver and kidneys [ 33 ]. Probably, this hyper-activity represents a defense response to the systemic toxicity in the uremic condition [ 34 ]. Interestingly, e-GST appears as a log-term biomarker as its concentration is determined in the early step of the erythropoiesis and its level does not change during the life of the erythrocyte.

2. Methods

The literature search conducted online databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) covered the following conditions: e-GST and/or GSTP1-1 as an enzyme, GSH in the detoxifying process and oxidative stress with a preference implication for the GSTP1-1. Furthermore, chronic kidney disease, kidney transplant, liver diseases, neurodegenerative diseases, cancer, environmental pollution, veterinary field, psychiatric disorders, as applications for the e-GST.

Graphics and histograms were obtained by GraphPad Prism (La Jolla, CA, USA). Three-dimensional structures of glutathione Transferases were drawn by the means of UCSF Chimera software v1.6 [ 35 ]. Chemical structures were designed by the software ChemDraw Ultra v8 (PerkinElmer Informatics, Cambridge, MA, USA).

3. Usefulness of GSTP1-1 Enzymatic Activity in Some Pathological Conditions

3.1. Over-Expression of e-GST in Chronic Kidney Disease

Several studies have shown an over-expression of e-GST in various diseases, including chronic kidney disease (CKD). The first study to monitor e-GST activity in nephropathic patients was conducted by Carmagnol et al. [ 33 ]. The authors showed that in neonates with hyperbilirubinemia and in hemodialysis (HD) patients (aged 7 to 20 years), a significant increase in e-GST activity was observed compared to age-matched healthy control subjects. Mimic-Oka et al. [ 34 ] confirmed this finding pointing out increased GST and GSH levels in red blood cell (RBC) and leukocytes of CKD patients either in pre-dialysis under conservative therapy and in hemodialysis.

Subsequently, Galli et al. [ 36 ] highlighted that enzymatic expression could be a useful biomarker to check the uremic toxicity status in CKD patients, hypothesizing that it could also be used for the evaluation of dialysis efficiency. The authors demonstrated that the enhancement of e-GST activity in uremic patients is a consequence of increased expression, rather than a kinetic modulation of the enzyme protein. In this observational study conducted on 118 patients, e-GST expression was higher in dialysis patients compared to the general population. The study also suggested that e-GST overexpression cannot be considered a surrogate marker of oxidative stress (OS) because it is not influenced by vitamin E supplementation. In the same manner, even the response to erythropoietin therapy apparently did not influence e-GST levels and preliminary data of this study suggested that high-molecular-weight or protein-bound toxins could play a key role in the e-GST overexpression. In the same study, only a few nephropathic subjects in pre-dialysis were examined and these patients presented a lower prevalence of e-GST overexpression when compared to HD patients (20% vs. 72%).

The data has been confirmed and further explained by a subsequent study, which analyzed the correlation of the degree of CKD, staging according to theNational Kidney Foundation Kidney - Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (NFK K-DOQI) guidelines [ 37 ] with e-GST activity ( Figure 6 ).

The study was conducted on 72 CKD patients under conservative therapy. The results showed that the enzyme activity was higher with increasing disease severity and inversely correlated to the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). In the same study, e-GST was also assayed in 62 chronic HD patients. e-GST was always high but, somewhat surprisingly, its levels were significantly lower in chronic HD patients than in those with the IV stage of CKD ( Figure 6 ). These findings can be easily explained by considering that the dialysis procedure is able to remove toxic compounds that accumulate during end-stage-renal disease (ESRD). Interestingly, e-GST activity was not related to the acute and chronic inflammation indices, nor to the nutritional status of the subjects. Conversely, direct correlation has been observed between the plasma values of homocysteine (Hcy) and the e-GST activity [ 38 , 39 ] ( Figure 7 ).

Increased Hcy values lead to a decrease in nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity. In fact, the self-oxidation of the sulfur amino acids of the Hcy leads to the formation of S-nitroso-homocysteine, which in turn inhibits the enzymatic activity of the NOS. For this reason, hyperhomocysteinemia was positively correlated with the increase in OS and endothelial damage [ 40 ].

A later study [ 41 ] verified the potential of e-GST as an alternative or complementary biomarker to the Kt/V urea parameter in order to assess the dose and adequacy of dialysis treatment, comparing diffusive and convective dialysis techniques. It was underlined that e-GST activity does not evaluate the adequacy of a single dialytic treatment, as it occurs for Kt/V urea , but rather it represents a biomarker of dialytic adequacy for a number of dialytic sessions accomplished during a few weeks span. In this study, the increased e-GST activity in ESRD patients was confirmed in 103 HD patients compared to 82 healthy subjects (9.0 ± 0.4 vs. 5.6 ± 0.4 U/g Hb, respectively). Subdividing this population into two subgroups based on the type of dialytic procedure, 44 patients on diffusive techniques were compared with 59 patients on convective techniques. e-GST activity was significantly lower in convective than in diffusive subgroup (8.2 ± 0.4 vs. 10.0 ± 0.4 U/g Hb, respectively) ( Figure 8 ).

Single-pool Kt/V urea and total weekly Kt/V urea were higher in convective group with respects to diffusive group (1.5 ± 0.1 vs. 1.3 ± 0.1, and 4.6 ± 0.1 vs. 3.9 ± 0.2), but no significant correlation was found between e-GST activity and Kt/V urea data [ 41 ]. This data confirmed e-GST activity as a long-term marker of dialysis adequacy, even if further clinical studies conducted on a larger population will be necessary to definitively enforce such thesis.

A recent retrospective study [ 42 ] investigated plasma Hcy and blood thiol status of 98 HD patients. The study demonstrated that a daily (2 h) hemodialysis could lead to a better correction of the uremic retention solute than a standard (three times/week) HD. This correction effect of daily hemodialysis on hyperhomocysteinemia correlates with that on the detoxification enzyme e-GST and on plasma GSH [ 42 ].

The e-GST was also over-expressed in nephropathic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In fact, a recent study highlighted an increase in e-GST activity in nephropathic and non-nephropathic diabetic patients compared to the control group. Specifically, this increase was proportional to the stage of CKD. This study also confirmed the correlation between e-GST activity and the Hcy levels [ 43 ]. Therefore, e-GST could be considered an early biomarker of renal dysfunction in diabetic patients, as its overexpression could be present even in the absence of increased traditional renal damage markers (like albuminuria). In this context, possible correlations between traditional biomarkers, used for evaluation of glyco-metabolic control in T2DM, and e-GST activity were also examined. The results suggested that the overexpression of e-GST is related to the level of renal damage and not to diabetes itself [ 43 , 44 , 45 ].

This data differs from that observed in a previous study reporting no differences in e-GST activity between 68 T2DM and 32 non-diabetic patients [ 46 ].

3.2. Overexpression of e-GST in Kidney Transplanted Patients

Renal-transplantation represents the election treatment in uremic patients [ 47 ] as it improves the quality of life and reduces the risk of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity compared to chronic dialysis therapy [ 48 ]. In this category of patients is important to identify biomarkers of the intoxication status, of OS and of possible rejection in order to preserve the transplanted organ for as long as possible. In light of this, studies concerning the metabolism of glutathione and its related enzymes appear of great utility.

In this context, a total of 169 kidney-transplanted patients after at least 3 months from transplant was examined: specifically 153 kidney-transplant patients from cadaver donors and 16 kidney-transplant patients from living donors [ 49 ]. Both groups had higher levels of e-GST activity when compared to the control group. In addition, the renal-transplanted patients from cadaver donors had significantly increased e-GST levels in comparison with patients receiving organs from living donors. The mean value of e-GST activity in the transplant patient, was comparable to that monitored in stage IV CKD patients ( Figure 9 ).

These data suggest that during transplantation, the kidneys undergo an ischemia-reperfusion insult, which is observed in the course of the retrieval, losing part of their detoxifying capacity. This phenomenon appears more evident in transplanted kidneys from cadavers. In addition, OS and an inflammatory process are observed during renal ischemia-reperfusion: the lipid membranes undergo a process of peroxidation, while DNA and proteins suffer oxidative damage with consequent apoptosis and necrosis [ 50 , 51 ]. With the exception of steroids, no correlation was found between e-GST levels and immunosuppressive therapy and even with routine clinical and laboratory parameters. Furthermore, in one patient a large increase of e-GST value, about 180%, was observed just before acute rejection, supposing that it could become an early rejection biomarker [ 49 ]. This hypothesis should be confirmed by further clinical studies conducted on a higher number of patients.

3.3. GSTP1-1 in Neurodegenerative Diseases and Psychiatric Disorders

The central nervous system is particularly sensitive to OS because of the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the principal causes and effects of the high content of ROS are the alteration of the balance between pro- and anti-oxidant molecules and dysregulation of GSH homeostasis [ 52 , 53 ]. Neurons are active cells for their oxidative metabolism characterized by an equilibrium between supply and consumption of both glucose and oxygen, for such reason a crucial role for OS in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases was reported [ 54 ].

Neurological disorders are a large variety of pathologies including Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, epilepsy, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. In all these pathologies, GSTP1 polymorphisms ( Table 1 ) showed altered levels in term of decrease or increase [ 55 ].

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder in which movement alterations and non-motor symptoms are present. In this pathological condition, a reduction in GSH levels may be involved in the onset of the disease [ 54 ], while GSTP1-1 levels increased in patients at advanced stages of the PD [ 56 , 57 ]. Moreover, GSTP1-1 polymorphisms are associated with an increased risk of PD, following cigarette smoke [ 58 ], and pesticide exposure [ 59 ].

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a chronic neurodegenerative pathology, characterized by the accumulation of protein aggregates and fibrils in the brain. Recent studies suggest that GSTP1-1 is involved in cyclin-dependent kinase-5 regulation by the modulation of its expression in AD patients and therefore prevents neurodegeneration [ 60 ]. The presence of the allelic variant of GSTP1-1 ( GSTP1-1 * C ) may affect cognitive functions in certain AD patients and may be responsible for an increased susceptibility for late onset AD [ 61 ]. An important risk factor for AD may be the V allele of GSTP1 mainly in the presence of apoE 4 allele [ 62 ].

Epilepsy was defined as a cerebral disorder characterized by an enduring predisposition to generate epileptic seizures, and by the neurobiological, cognitive, psychological and social consequences [ 63 ]. The definition of epilepsy has been changed recently for more practical clinical use [ 63 ]. An evidence for the resistance to antiepilectic drugs derived from a correlation between increased level of GSTP1-1 in the brain and medical intractability of epilepsy. GSTP1-1 could be responsible for this condition of resistance in epileptic patients [ 64 ]. GSTs catalyze the conjugation of metabolites to GSH, favoring the removal of epoxide metabolites that are generated during the metabolism of antiepileptic drugs [ 65 ]. High levels of GSTP1-1 expression have been observed in endothelial and astrocytic cells in cases of intractable epilepsy, which would seem to be associated with resistance to antiepileptic drug treatment [ 65 ].

Furthermore, GSTP1 polymorphisms and GSTP1-1 variants are involved in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). ALS is an idiopathic, fatal neurodegenerative disease of the human motor system in which the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the development of ALS seem multifactorial with a complex interaction between genetic and molecular pathways [ 66 ]. OS may cause ALS onset with the co-presence of heavy metal that trigger the increase of cellular ROS. Lead exposure and ALS risk may correlate with the expression of the GSTP1-1 (variant Ile105Val). This GSTP1 variant increased the effect of lead on the population of subjects examined. The association between blood lead levels and ALS was increased among GSTP1 variant carriers in fact differences in the phenotypic expression of GSTP1 in polymorphic variants may alter the clearance rate of lead-induced oxidative stressors and thereby influence a lead-ALS association [ 67 ]. Another study reported that mRNA levels for GSTP were significantly down-regulated in the spinal cord, motor cortex, and the sensory cortex of ALS patients [ 68 ].

Several studies have linked OS increase and the onset of schizophrenia [ 69 , 70 ]. Schizophrenia is a neurobiological disorder characterized by neurocognitive dysfunctions, it typically manifests as positive (for example hallucinations) and/or negative symptoms (cognitive dysfunction, decreased motivation) [ 71 , 72 ]. Two recent trials investigated GR and GST activities in both erythrocytes and platelets, in patients with schizophrenia. They concluded that the activity of glutathione-dependent enzymes is impaired in schizophrenia spectrum disorders and the decreased level of GR and GST contributes to a reduction in antioxidant defense. For this reason, the evaluation of GR and GST activities could be a novel potential biomarker for predicting treatment response in this population [ 73 , 74 ]. However, two studies did not find any association between GSTP1 polymorphisms and schizophrenia, probably because GSTP1 polymorphisms do not affect protein levels, but modulate GSTP1 affinity to its substrates. GSTP1 polymorphisms do not confer susceptibility to schizophrenia [ 75 , 76 ].

Finally, the psychiatric disorder of autism (a neurodevelopmental syndrome) is defined by deficits in social reciprocity and communication, and by unusual restricted, repetitive behaviors. Autism is a heterogeneous condition with an intriguing medical debate about the cause that generates conditions associated to autism during childhood (from genetic predisposition to environmental exposition to toxin and many others) [ 77 ]. In this respect, studies were recently carried out about the correlation between autism spectrum disorders and detoxifying enzymes (like GST and in particular GSTP1). Interestingly, the role of GSTP1 , GST theta 1, and GST mu 1 gene polymorphisms in susceptibility to autism spectrum disorders was investigated. In the population of children examined no significant associations was derived between autism spectrum disorders status and GSTT1 , GSTM1 , or GSTP1 genotype. However, in children heterozygous for the GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism, the odds of autism spectrum disorders were significantly higher in those with the null GSTT1 genotype than those with the other genotypes [ 78 ].

3.4. e-GST Activity and Scleroderma

Scleroderma or systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune disease, which induces connective tissue hardening. It determines vascular alterations, activation of the immune system and fibrosis of the skin and of internal organs [ 79 ]. In the pathogenesis of SSc, the exposure to toxins is proposed to play a pivotal role, since the endothelium damage is probably triggered by inflammatory cytokines, granzymes, ROS and vasculotropic viruses [ 80 ]. In fact, almost 70% of patients affected by SSc have a pulmonary dysfunction which represents the primary death cause in this population [ 81 ].

In this pathology, kidney damage is frequent, so the possible relationship between the degree of the disease and levels of e-GST activity was investigated. In fact, e-GST is overexpressed in all SSc patients (n = 102), reaching a mean value of 13 U/g Hb, more than two times higher than healthy subjects (5.8 U/g Hb). Enzyme levels in these patients correlated (r 2 = 0.49, p < 0.0001) with the Medsger DSS [ 82 ] and DAI Valentini [ 83 ] indices that quantify the activity and severity of the disease. Surprisingly, e-GST levels of SSc patients were not influenced by the presence of kidney damage or by other defects of specific organs taken separately. Therefore e-GST hyper-expression in this condition appears to be linked with the exposure to putative toxins that cause the disease, rather than being caused by the autoimmune disease per se, by the damage of specific organs, or by other consequences of the disease that may also include OS [ 84 ].

The autoimmune diseases are not only limited to scleroderma but in medical science, more than one-hundred autoimmune diseases are classified. These disorders usually have a clear genetic component and evidence of activation of the innate immune system. The rates of autoimmune disorders are increasing in industrialized countries and greater attention is direct to improve diagnostic procedures and therapeutic interventions [ 85 ]. Only one study is based on the enzymatic level of e-GST in scleroderma [ 84 ]. The other studies reported in the literature focused on GSTP1 polymorphisms (see Section 3.6 and Table 1 ) in pathologies like systemic lupus erythematosus [ 86 ], or are meta-analysis suggesting that the GSTP1 polymorphisms are not associated with the risk of rheumatoid arthritis [ 87 ]. Another study confirmed the lack of association between GSTP1 polymorphisms and multiple sclerosis [ 88 ]. However, further studies are required for a better comprehension of the environmental factors implicated and the roles played by GSTP1 polymorphisms in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases.

3.5. Role of e-GST in Oxidative Stress

All subjects are chronically exposed to endogenous and exogenous oxidants species [ 89 , 90 ]. GST enzymes and other intracellular “redox buffers” provide protection representing an antioxidant network [ 91 ]. Compounds like ROS and OS are able to cause DNA, protein and lipid damage with an epidemic onset of chronic non-communicable diseases [ 92 , 93 ].

Various experimental studies have investigated the mechanism of action of various endogenous systems, including e-GST, which can promote defenses against OS.

A randomized controlled trial conducted in 2016 by Gouda et al. [ 94 ], investigated the activity of e-GST after 3 weeks intake of natural antioxidants, derived from plants polyphenols. The authors showed that e-GST activity increased significantly after consumption of plant polyphenols (derived from pomegranate juice) associated with fermented sour soya. These data suggest that a diet supplemented with a high content of antioxidants favors the body’s natural defenses against oxygen free radicals [ 95 ].

In a previous study [ 96 ], the effects of a low-protein diet in nephropathic patients on e-GST levels was investigated. This study highlighted a decreasing trend in e-GST mean values, although not in a statistically significant manner and an improvement in renal function assessed through estimated-GFR (e-GFR). Therefore, even in nephropathic patients, correct dietetic-nutritional treatment can be a valid therapeutic support to counteract the progression of CKD and the increase of OS.

A review in 2014 by Salminen et al. examined the different physiopathological mechanisms that could lead to brain aging [ 89 ]. OS plays a decisive role in the decline of cognitive function and in the aging process [ 97 , 98 ]. Compared to other organs, the brain has some disadvantages related to the generation and detoxification of ROS. In fact, brain cells use about 20% of body oxygen, even though they represent only 2% of total body weight [ 99 ]. Therefore, in the brain, there is a very high concentration of ROS and has moderate activity of catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase and superoxide dismutase (SOD) compared to the liver and kidney [ 100 ]. Moreover, in the brain, there is a superoxide accumulation, which is able to interfere with DNA structure and with the mitochondrial electron transport chain [ 101 ]. In this context, the action of glutathione is fundamental for the elimination of peroxides and free radicals in the brain cells and in the protection against ROS [ 102 , 103 , 104 ].

3.6. GSTP1-1 in Cancer

GSTs are one of the primary causes of cancer treatment failure. The problem of drug resistance (e.g., chemotherapy) may be attributed to factors of different nature like inhibition of apoptosis pathways, expression of multidrug resistance-associated proteins, altered drug metabolism or uptake [ 105 ]. Chemotherapeutic-resistant tumor cell lines have been shown to overexpress GST isozymes. GSTP1-1 is abundantly expressed in some mammalian tissues associated with tumors. GSTP1-1 usually is highly expressed in proliferating cells than in the differentiated cells and this elevated expression is associated with the cancer progression and therapy resistance [ 106 ]. This overexpression leads to accelerated detoxification of drug substrates and thus an acquired resistance. Furthermore, the roles of GSTP1-1 are not only limited to the catalytic properties but also to regulate kinase-dependent proliferation pathways; in fact, the ligand-binding capacity results in the negative regulation of signaling pathways through sequestration of signaling kinases [ 105 ]. The condition of OS in the cell favors the dissociation of the complex between GSTP1-1 and Jun-kinase and the subsequent activation of the released Jun-kinase allowing the induction of apoptosis. In tumor cells, kinase pathways are dysregulated, and so the cells may attempt to compensate by enhancing expression of GSTP1-1 to control kinase activity. The formation of the complex (GSTP1-1: Jun-kinase) is an event that protects tumoral cells from apoptosis [ 107 ].

The parallel overexpression of GSTP1-1 and efflux pumps may confer resistance to the tumor cells against chemotherapeutic drugs like cisplatin in osteosarcoma [ 108 ]. Another category of compounds in cancer research is the inhibitors of GSTP1-1 [ 109 ]. The inhibitors enhance the effect of the anticancer drugs and they may be used in novel therapeutic applications. The ethacrynic acid (a strong diuretic drug) is conjugated to 2-amino-2-deoxy-D-glucose to reduce diuretic effects but maintaining the inhibitory capacity against GSTP1-1, the ethacrynic acid derivatives are molecules with promising anti-proliferative activities against cancer cells [ 110 ]. Examples of well-characterized inhibitors of GSTP1-1 are auranofin and the irreversible inhibitor ethacraplatin. An interesting class of inhibitors is represented by GSH analogues that are more specific for GSTs and less toxic for the cell. An example of a GSH analogue was obtained through the chemical modification of γ-L-glutamyl-L-cysteinylglycine (GSH) into γ-glutamyl-S-(benzyl)cysteinyl-phenylglycine diethyl ester (i.e., ezatiostat or TLK199) that is easily absorbed by the cell where its metabolites bind the G-site (the GSH binding site) of GSTP1-1 causing its inhibition [ 111 ]. Selected 7-nitro-2,1,3-benzoxadiazole derivatives have been characterized as very efficient inhibitors of GSTP1-1. In particular, 6-(7-nitro-2,1,3-benzoxidiazol-4-ylthio) hexanol (NBDHEX) is an efficient inhibitor able also to dissociate GSTP1-1 from its complex with Jun-kinase or TRAF-2. NBDHEX stimulates proapoptotic pathways with an anticancer capability also showing activity on cisplatin-resistant human osteosarcoma cells [ 108 ].

Chemotherapy, the most common therapeutic treatment for cancer, shows two main limitations due to dose-limiting toxicities of drugs and the development of drug resistance. Therefore, research studies have been focused on classes of natural products that can be used as potential anti-cancer agents. Botanical sources, phytochemical classes and chemical structures of these natural products together with their influence on GSTs induction in vitro and in animal models were studied [ 112 ]. In fact, a typical natural product, the piperlongumine isolated from Piper species is used in traditional medicine. Piperlongumine is hydrolyzed within the cell giving the active form and the latter interacts with GSH forming a complex that binds the active site of GSTP1-1 inhibiting the enzyme [ 113 ].

In addition to the inhibitors and chemotherapeutic drugs for GSTP1-1, there are the pro-drugs.

The pro-drugs specifically designed to interact with GSTP1-1 are divided into two groups: compounds that contain GSH or GSH-like structure, and molecules activated by the formation of GSH-conjugate intermediate via GSTP1-1 enzymatic activity. In the first group, the canfosfamide is a GSH analogue activated by GSTP1-1 and in the other one, doxorubicin derivatives are converted in the active parent drugs via sulfonamide cleavage by GSTP1-1 [ 114 ].

The studies focused on GSTP1-1 and its relationships with cancer biology were not limited to finding a way to inhibit the enzymatic activity or modulate the apoptotic pathway with the development of different compounds. The molecular biology of GSTP1 gene expression, the transcript levels and the enzyme expression in different types of tumors is a new frontier of research.

The polymorphism of GSTP1 could be considered as single nucleotide point mutations within exon 5, in which the most common are Ile105Val and Ala114Val. The mutated enzyme shows change at the substrate-binding site but without affecting the GSH-binding affinity ( Table 1 ). These polymorphisms influence the enzyme activity consequently the drug detoxifying capacity altering the cellular DNA damage and indirectly enhancing the risk of cancer development [ 106 , 107 ]. Generally, Ile105Val polymorphism is associated with a higher susceptibility to a variety of malignancies but also the Ala114Val polymorphism contributes to cancer risk susceptibility as it appears in esophageal carcinoma.

Nevertheless, GSTP1 expression varying through methylation state of the specific CpG islands is not recognized in other GSTs genes. Hyper-methylation of the promoter region has been reported in human prostatic carcinomas, but not in normal or benign tissues. Aberrant methylation in breast cancers and renal carcinomas has been observed. In all cases, methylation was associated with loss of GSTP1 expression [ 104 ]. High prevalence of GSTP1 gene methylation has been found in the serum of gastric cancer patients. This methylation detected in serum, possibly caused by circulating nucleic acid released by gastric cancer cells, is correlated with gene methylation in gastric cancer tissues [ 115 ]. GSTP1 represents an ideal epigenetic biomarker and may be used as a liquid biopsy biomarker. Indeed, it could be detected with good results in circulating cell-free DNA and urinary DNA. This promising future clinical application may be of interest because methylation of GSTP1 can be found in the early event of carcinogenesis representing a sort of early biomarker in different tumors [ 116 ].

Actually, the scientific literature about the GSTP1 polymorphisms and cancer is extremely abundant, in this respect here we only report a few examples for a restricted number of common types of tumors.

The important class of blood tumors is the first in which polymorphisms are associated to poor prognosis and methylation state of GSTP1 promoter. The Hodkin’s lymphoma was studied for the involvement of GSTs polymorphisms in term of susceptibility and progression and also for the prognosis [ 117 ]. Leukemia studies were focused on the association of Ile105Val polymorphism with chronic myeloid leukemia [ 118 ] and on genotypes of GSTP1 Ile105Val substitution for both acute lymphocytic leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia patients. Notably, Val/Val might be considered as risk genotype for developing acute lymphocytic and acute myeloid leukemia associated with a poor prognosis [ 119 ]. The epigenetic control of GSTP1 gene results relevant in cancer prevention and diagnosis. A correlation between promoter hyper-methylation of GSTP1 and response to chemotherapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma proving that GSTP1 gene methylation status could be an indicator of drug response and a prognosticator for this lymphoma [ 120 ]. In the specific case of multiple myeloma, no significant association was found between NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 Pro187Ser or GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphisms and multiple myeloma risk and also GSTP1 allelic variation may not influence susceptibility to this malignancy. Another study found no association between GSTP1 Ile105Val or Ala114Val genotype and an increased risk of multiple myeloma but suggested that polymorphic variation in GSTP1 are significant predictors of outcome following treatment with chemotherapeutic agents and may be a step in the development of more individualized treatment regimens for myeloma based on host genetic factors [ 121 ].

Overexpression of GSTP1-1 is involved in poor prognosis in brain tumors including glioma and glioblastoma [ 65 ]. In brain tumors patients with anaplastic glioma who have GST genotypes encoding for a lower activity enzymes may confer a survival advantage respect patients who have higher activity genotypes [ 122 ]. A controversial conclusion in glioma emerges from another study in which the analysis did not find any association among GSTs and in particular the GSTP1 polymorphisms (Ile105Val and Ala114Val) and tumor risk. These negative results support the evidence that GST genotypes may not be accurate predictors of tissue-specific GST expression as it occurs also for GSTP1-1 [ 123 ].

The role of GSTP1 polymorphisms in solid tumor breast cancer is not well defined due to preliminary results deriving from two meta-analyses on a large number of women. A first study shows that GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism may be associated with an elevated breast cancer risk in the Asian population [ 124 ]. Another study proposes that women who were homozygous for the variant GSTP1 Ile105Val allele had a reduction in mortality risk [ 125 ]. The methylation state of GSTP1 is also involved in breast cancer, in fact, the unmethylated state is a benign group while hyper-methylated GSTP1 gene promoters represent a borderline/malignant tumor group of patients. GSTP1 expression can predict pathological response to chemotherapeutic treatments with 5- fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide in estrogen receptor-negative tumors but not in estrogen receptor-positive tumors [ 120 ].

The reproductive female apparatus is subject to a variety of tumors; GSTP1-1 is also studied in correlation with women patients affected by cervix and ovarian cancer. The expression levels of mRNA of the resistance genes, like GSTP1, were measured in cancer tissue specimens and compared with pathological data, to understand their role in primary drug resistance. The mRNA expression levels of GSTP1 in cervical cancer tissue specimens were higher with respect to the healthy cervical tissues. In conclusion, GSTP1 mRNA levels in the tumor tissues did not exhibit a significant association with the clinicopathological features of the patients but only mediating resistance of tumor cells to cisplatin [ 126 ]. The ovarian cancer studies were based usually existing upon patient controls and hospital-based study designs. Unfortunately, the studies carried out do not confirm an association between GSTP1 and epithelial ovarian cancer [ 127 ]. In general, no consistent association between any gene polymorphism and clinical outcome in gynecological cancers has been found across studies [ 128 ]. Endometrial carcinoma is the most common gynecologic cancer in developed countries; curiously a first study reported an association between GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism and endometrial carcinoma. Whereas a statistically significant association was shown between GSTP1 polymorphism and type I endometrioid carcinoma of endometrium, no significant association between GSTP1 polymorphism and non-endometrioid type II cancer could be established [ 129 ].

The global burden of prostate cancer is substantial, ranking among the top five cancers for both incidence and mortality and globally, prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in men [ 130 ]. GSTP1 gene expression and GSTP1-1 enzyme activity were studied in human prostate carcinoma cells and human prostate tissue specimens. The results suggested that GSTP1 promoter methylation is higher in cancer tissue than in benign tissue from the same individual and reduced GSTP1 expression is observed in prostate cancer specimens compared to their benign counterparts. The loss of GSTP1 expression in human prostate cells increased their susceptibility to OS-induced DNA damage [ 131 ]. Detection of GSTP1 methylation in all types of body fluids of prostate cancer patients represents a promising epigenetic biomarker, while the unmethylated promoter allowed to distinguish benign lesions from cancerous transformations [ 120 ].

The renal cell carcinoma and transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder studies offered experimental data to determine if the GSTP1-1 may be considered a potential urinary marker [ 132 ]. GSTP1-1 is generally present in renal cell carcinoma; however, the level of expression has been reported to be increased, unchanged or decreased compared with normal kidney tissue. Generally, data supported that GSTP1-1 activity contributes to the intrinsic drug resistance in this tumor [ 132 ]. GSTP1-1 overexpression is characteristic of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Detectable levels of urinary GSTP1-1, deriving from desquamation of the tumor, have been addressed in only one study as a potential urinary marker [ 133 ]. Plasma GSTP1-1 could be considered as a marker of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder, in fact, elevated levels of GSTP1-1 were found in patients with tumors. However, the conclusion of the study was clear against the possible use of plasma GSTP1-1 as a marker of bladder cancer [ 134 ].

Colorectal cancer is the third most common form of cancer and the fourth most frequent cause of cancer deaths worldwide. The overall survival, GSTP1-1 expression, and GSTP1 genetic polymorphism in stage C of colon cancer were investigated in patients after resection alone versus patients after resection treated by a 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Stage C colon cancer patients with high GSTP1-1 should be treated with 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy on the other hand patients with low intracellular concentrations of GSTP1-1 may not need to be treated. This study highlighted the possible predictive value of GSTP1-1 expression in regard to chemotherapy for stage C colon cancer [ 135 ]. Meta-analysis studies did not confirm previous observations about a role for GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism in colorectal cancer susceptibility [ 136 ] and the capability of GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism to confer any additional colorectal cancer risk [ 137 ].

Gastric cancer is a multifactorial disease involving genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors, including diet, chronic atrophic gastritis, radiation exposure, and infection by Helicobacter pylori [ 138 ]. GSTP1 polymorphism was significantly associated with gastric cancer suggesting that can be considered a risk factor associated with gastric carcinogenesis [ 139 ]. Moreover, the same GSTP1 polymorphism associated with larger tumor size may contribute to cancer progression and aggressiveness [ 140 ]. Conversely, in a population examined for gastric cancer there was no relationship with polymorphisms in GSTP1 [ 141 ] and for another study patients with gastric cancer who received 5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin chemotherapy as a first-line treatment, those possessing the GSTP1 105Val variant allele showed a statistically significant benefit for both time for progression and overall survival [ 142 ].

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is a lethal malignancy and there are few useful markers for its diagnosis and treatment. In a recent study, there was a significant association between GSTP1 expression in resected tissue and biopsy samples in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. GSTP1 was related to malignant potential and may be a predictive marker of drug resistance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients [ 143 ]. A previous study found a significant association between the variant GSTP1 Ala114Val genotype and increased risk of recurrence and death. GSTP1-1, which is actively involved in the detoxification of cisplatin, has been implicated as a predictive marker of overall survival in cancer patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy [ 144 ]. Finally, GSTP1 is a major GST isoform expressed in the human esophagus but a review on the argument stated that results of relations between GSTP1 polymorphisms and esophageal cancer were inconsistent [ 145 ].

Pancreatic cancer is a multifactorial disease with metastasis-prone and therapy-resistant nature; the predominant expression of GSTP1-1 in pancreatic cells may explain why GSTP1 polymorphisms exerted effects on risk and survival of pancreatic cancer. The first study to suggest a role of GSTP1 polymorphisms in pancreatic pathogenesis concluded that genetic polymorphisms of GSTP1 may be among the mechanisms that modify the risk of pancreatic cancer in older individuals and affect the survival of patients who receive 5-fluorouracil-based treatment [ 146 ]. Indeed, tumor expression of GSTP1 does not predict the safety or efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy regimen Folfirinox (leucovorin, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) in patients with pancreatic cancer [ 147 ].

Lung cancer is the most morbid and mortal disease among tumors, recent studies demonstrated that only GSTP1 Ala114Val polymorphism, but not GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism or wild-type genotype, was associated with improved survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients. In addition, no significant association between GSTP polymorphisms response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy was observed in the patients examined [ 148 , 149 ]. A meta-analysis indicates that the risk of lung cancer is not associated with the Ile105Val and Ala114Val polymorphisms in the GSTP1 gene [ 150 ]. However, many studies were not in agreement about the GSTP1 methylation frequency in cancerous tissue of non-small cell lung cancer patients respect adjacent benign tissue [ 116 ].

Skin cancer can be divided into melanoma and non-melanoma skin malignancies. Most skin cancers are non-melanomatous including basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Melanoma only accounts for about 2% of malignant skin cancer but causes most deaths [ 151 ]. Moreover, environmental and genetic factors influence the development of disease. GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism may have a genetic contribution to the development of malignant melanoma [ 152 ]. A previous study confirmed the association of Ile105Val polymorphism with malignant melanoma [ 153 ]. Induced skin tumors may be affected by exposition to toxic compounds like arsenic compounds mainly the inorganic trivalent form (arsenite). An analysis of skin cancer patients suggested that GSTs (including P1-1), ROS, related metabolic genes, and DNA repair genes together may play a role in arsenic-induced skin carcinogenesis [ 154 ].

Osteosarcoma is the leading cause of bone malignancy in adolescents. The etiology of osteosarcoma is not well understood; in fact, environmental (e.g., ionizing radiation) and genetic factors may contribute to the development of this cancer [ 155 ]. One of the most recent studies, in which Asian osteosarcoma patients were analyzed, suggested that the GSTP1 gene polymorphism is associated with an increased risk of osteosarcoma, whereas the other GSTs gene polymorphisms may not influence the development of this cancer [ 156 ]. Another previous study found a significant association between the polymorphisms GSTs and osteosarcoma risk, but no evidence of association about GSTP1 polymorphisms with prognosis in osteosarcoma [ 157 ]. Furthermore, a study suggested that genetic variation of GSTP1 Ile105Val may be used as a prognostic factor to identify osteosarcoma patients who might benefit from chemotherapy [ 158 ].

In conclusion, all studies about GSTP1-1 and cancer could be divided into two groups. In the first one, the over-expression of GSTP1-1 enzyme in cancerous cells is a well-defined and understood phenomenon. Drug development is focused on GSTP1-1 enzymatic inhibition, new potential chemotherapeutic agents, and pro-drug molecules. The second group, exploring the molecular biology and GSTP1 gene polymorphisms, comes to controversial conclusions about the tumor risk factor associated with GSTP1 polymorphism due to the small sample size of the population examined in the majority of published studies and the absence of an associated statistical analysis. GSTP1-1 remains a promising biomarker but not already used in the clinical practice.

3.7. GSTP1-1 and Liver Disease

Although the GSTP1-1 enzyme is not expressed in human hepatocyte under physiological conditions, it may be present in some pathological conditions such as liver cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [ 159 ].

As previously discussed, the first study that investigated the enhancement of e-GST activity in liver diseases was conducted by Carmagnol et al. [ 33 ]. This study pointed out that e-GST was higher in neonates presenting hyperbilirubinemia at birth compared to normal neonates.

Further studies have highlighted, in animal models, the relationship between the expression of GST and the presence of liver fibrosis. In human, liver fibrosis is frequently associated with HCC, but little is known about the involvement of the fibrosis in carcinogenesis.

Sakaida et al. [ 160 ] investigated the effect on liver fibrosis of the administration of a prolyl 4-hydroxylase inhibitor (HOE 077) to male Wistar rats fed with a diet deficient in L-defined amino acids (CDAA) choline. The HOE 077 administration reduced the hepatic content of hydroxyproline (a parameter that reflects the amount of collagen), the number of pseudolobules and made the fibrous septa thinner. Furthermore, it reduced the number, average, diameter and percentage of GSTP-positive lesions.

In a later study, the same group of researches [ 161 ] showed how the injection, for eight weeks, of pig serum in rats induced stellate activation resulting in hepatic fibrosis without obvious parenchymal cell damage. Moreover, a CDAA diet for six weeks caused pre-neoplastic lesions both in pretreated and non-pretreated rats with pig serum. These pre-neoplastic lesions were positive for the placental form of GST (GSTP).

Subsequently, these authors further deepened the studies [ 162 ] by detecting how TGF-β1 RNA expression is induced by treatment with pig serum and inhibits hepatocyte proliferation, but it does not prevent the development of pre-neoplastic lesions in a CDAA diet model.

Hepatic cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death [ 163 ]. A large number of studies investigated the possible correlation between the cancer onset and the increase in GSTP levels.

Dysregulation of the Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1)-Nrf2 pathway has been showed in experimental and human tumors, suggesting its possible role in cancer development. In an experimental rat model, that induces diffuse fatty liver and steatohepatitis with fibrosis, Orrù et al. [ 164 ] investigated how the mutation/activation of Nrf2 is involved in early stages of hepatocarcinogenesis. Its inactivation leads to prevent the development of pre-neoplastic lesions, identified by increasing of GSTP.

Kin et al. [ 165 ] evaluated the effect of TNP-470 (an inhibitor of angiogenesis) on the progression of HCC in an experimental rat model. In CDAA diet rats, TNP-470 treatment caused a reduction of the size, the frequency and vascularity of HCC compared to untreated rats. However, TNP-470 treatment did not influence the histology of liver cirrhosis and liver function. The authors concluded that TNP-470 did not affect the proliferation and apoptosis in GSTP- positive precancerous lesions.

Yang B et al. [ 159 ] examined the correlation between HCC and the promoter methylation status of nine tumor suppressor genes (TSG) (such as SOCS-1, GSTP, APC, E-cadherin, retinoic acid receptor beta, p14, p15, p16, and p73). Around 53% of the HCC cases had three or more TSG promoters methylated, in particular, methylation of SOCS-1 (65%), GSTP (54%) and APC (53%) was significantly more frequent in HCC compared to the cirrhotic liver ( p < 0.05).

Perra et al. [ 166 ] assessed that α-lipoic acid (α-LA), administered in a diet deficient in choline and methionine (CMD), promotes the growth of hepatic pre-neoplastic lesions in an animal model of hepatocarcinogenesis. Pre-neoplastic lesions were identified due to their positivity to GSTP. The administration of α-LA to rats fed CMD diet significantly increased the number of GSTP-positive lesions compared to rats treated only with the CMD diet, the average size of the positive areas to the GSTP and the percentage of GSTP-positive liver tissue. Moreover, the treatment of α-LA in combination with CMD diet caused fat accumulation, lipid peroxidation and hepatocyte death, greater expression of tumor necrosis factor-α, cytochrome 2E1, cyclooxygenase-2, chronic hepatocyte proliferation.

Lee et al. [ 167 ] found, in the rat liver, increased expression of EGF-R (transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor) and reduced expression of receptor tyrosine-protein kinase ErbB4 during diethylnitrosamine (DEN)-induced hepatocarcinogenesis. The EGF-R expression is related to hepatocyte proliferation caused by DEN through the nodule’s formation and hepatocellular neoplasms. In this rat model, the authors used GSTP as a biomarker to evaluate the presence of neoplastic foci. In fact, in most HCC, GSTP was expressed focally.

A study conducted in 2010 by Chen Y et al. [ 168 ] in the Taiwanese population investigated the possible genetic polymorphisms that can increase the risk of developing HCC. This study concluded that AG and GG alleles of GSTP1 gene polymorphism may increase the risk of developing HCC in the population aged < 57 years.

A recent meta-analysis highlighted that GSTP1 hypermethylation induces the inactivation of the GSTP1 gene, plays a pivotal role in hepatocarcinogenesis, and is associated with an enhancement risk of HCC [ 169 ].

Wang et al. [ 170 ] evaluated the prognostic value of single nucleotide polymorphisms in seven encoding genes of GSTs for HCC. Rs4147581 in GSTP1 gene had a significant relationship with the survival of HCC patients ( p = 0.006), while its mutant allele presented a significantly lower risk of death compared to homozygous wild-type. The authors highlighted the role of GSTP1 rs4147581 polymorphism as a prognostic indicator of HCC.

4. Environmental and Endogenous Factors Affecting GST Levels in Healthy Subjects

Environmental pollution is one of the most serious global challenges that affects biodiversity, ecosystems, and human health worldwide. Most pollutants have various adverse health effects from early life; some of the most important harmful effects are perinatal disorders, infant mortality, respiratory disorders, allergy, malignancies, cardiovascular diseases, increase in OS, endothelial dysfunction, mental disorders, and various other harmful effects [ 171 , 172 ].

GSTs have been widely used as a biomarker of pollution response. Accordingly, careful studies of this kind of enzyme especially on fishes, have been of great importance due to ecological and toxicological reasons [ 173 , 174 , 175 , 176 ] e-GST is overexpressed, in healthy subjects living in polluted areas ( Figure 10 ) [ 177 ].

e-GST can be used as a prognostic biomarker and monitoring tool of human conditions associated with increased exposure to endogenous toxins, xenobiotics and OS.

e-GST has been used as a biological marker of chemical exposure to industrial toxicants. Ansari and coworkers [ 178 ] showed that important industrial chemicals (propylene oxide, styrene oxide, ethylene dibromide and ethylene dichloride) inhibited GST from erythrocytes both in situ and in purified GST. This suggests that chemical exposure results in the reduced capability of e-GST to detoxify xenobiotics.

Singh and Awasthi [ 179 ] showed that 1.3 mM of the herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetate suffices to inhibit 50% of purified GSTP1-1. The in vitro susceptibility of GST activity from human erythrocytes to industrially important electrophiles like acrolein, propylene-oxide, styrene oxide, ethylene dibromide and ethylene dichloride has been described by Ansari et al. [ 178 ].

Kilpikari and Savolainen [ 180 ] in 1984 reported decreased values of e-GST activity in workers exposed to hot rubber fumes.

A more recent study on about 500 healthy volunteers, living in eight distinct areas at or near the Sacco River valley, a region of the Frosinone district (Lazio, Rome, Italy) ( Table 2 ) well known for its environmental pollution, proposed a role for e-GST as a biomarker of environmental pollution hazard.

Subjects from six different areas of that region showed 18%–44% increased levels of e-GST when compared to 400 volunteers living in the Rome hinterland, and the highest GST levels were observed in the areas of higher risk of pollution ( Figure 10 ). Oxidation dependent changes of GST activity were not observed in the blood specimens of the exposed populations [ 177 ].

Primavera et al. [ 181 ] studied workers exposed to 1,3-butadiene, a well-known oxidizing compound also present as a contaminant in the air of a few industrial areas, and probably also to other chemicals. The results showed that occupational exposure to low doses of 1,3-butadiene and probably also to other chemicals may indeed induce OS and impair GST balance in the RBC of workers and, therefore, suggest that the measurement of GST activity and of the glutathionylated hemoglobin levels can be recommended as promising biomarkers in petrochemical workers.

Moreover, GST genes are involved in oxidative stress management and may modify the impact of indoor air pollution. Indoor air pollutants (e.g., tobacco, smoke, dust, and generated from cooking and heating) may contribute greatly to allergic disease pathogenesis in people who spent much of their time indoors [ 182 ]. The authors conclude in the systematic review that GSTP1 Val genotypes are more susceptible to indoor air pollution exposure, having a higher risk of asthma and lung function deficits, although some findings are conflicting in terms of risk alleles and specific exposures [ 182 ].

e-GST in Acute and Chronic Exposition to Contaminants: A Brief Comment

On the basis of the current literature, it appears that a chronic exposition to various contaminants may increase or decrease the activity of e-GST. When an increase occurs as in the case of the humans living in polluted areas or exposed to pesticides [ 183 ]; this is likely due to an increased synthesis of e-GST and to the absence of specific GST inhibitors in those contaminants. On the contrary, chronic exposition to specific toxins that may inhibit the enzymatic activity of GST may cause an underestimation of the e-GST which instead has been over-expressed in the erythrocyte. This has been likely demonstrated to occur for smokers [ 184 ].

In fact, e-GST activities of 3.03 ± 0.18 U/mg were found for the 46 smokers, and this value is significantly lower than what was found for the 41 non-smoker controls (3.98 ± 0.26 U/mg). This lower activity value in smokers is in accordance with a previous study [ 185 ]. However, elevated GSTP protein concentrations in smokers were found using an ELISA technique. This suggests that an extra GST synthesis occurs during erythrocyte proliferation but also the presence of some unknown GST inhibitor in the smoke.

In the case of acute exposition to contaminants, no specific studies have been done on the effects on e-GST levels. However, it can be speculated that no variation is expected if the analysis is performed within a few days from the contamination. In fact, some effect can be evident only after a few weeks given that the erythrocyte life is about 120 days and e-GST is expressed only during erythropoiesis. An apparent decreased level of e-GST would be found if the contaminant is also a GST inhibitor. We underline that a few papers reported unrealistic GST present in human serum, reasonably due to analytical artifacts as demonstrated in a re-investigation study [ 32 ]. For example, other authors studying the effects of pesticides in pesticide-sprayers found in serum a GST activity corresponding to 344 U/mL in the control group which corresponds to about 3.4 mg/mL of GST P1-1 [ 186 ]. This value is 212,000 times higher than that found in healthy subjects (8–16 ng/mL).

5. Utility of e-GST in Veterinary Field

e-GST may be also used as a biomarker also for veterinary purposes and to check the health status of animals reared in the farms where air, water and soil pollution are becoming a global problem. Previous studies have reported that exposure of fish to pollutants (agricultural, industrial and sewage) evolved antioxidant defense systems which included enzymes such as GST, GR, SOD and CAT [ 187 ]. Many other studies have been performed describing the detoxifying role of GSTs in different animals [ 188 , 189 , 190 , 191 , 192 ].

Vodela JK et al. investigated and compared the e-GST activities of cattle, horses, pigs, goats, dogs, rabbits, rats and mice. These authors found highest e-GST activity in mouse followed by rats, dogs, cattle, pigs, goats, horses and rabbits (this species had the lowest level of e-GST) [ 193 ].

In a different study, the possibility that e-GST may be used as an innovative and highly sensitive biomarker of blood toxicity not only for humans but also for other mammals was explored. e-GSTs from humans, Bos taurus (cow), Sus scrofa (pig), Capra hircus (goat), Equus caballus (horse), Equus asinus (donkey) and Ovis aries (sheep), all show very similar amino acid sequences, identical kinetics and stability properties ( Figure 11 ) ( Table 3 ) [ 194 ].

As expected, the expression of e-GST activity is species-specific; the lowest levels were found in humans and pigs, whereas the highest activity was observed in the goat. Preliminary results on cows reared in farms residing in a highly polluted area confirmed that e-GST activity is a highly sensitive parameter for detecting increased toxicity levels, as observed in humans [ 177 ]. The overexpression of e-GST in animals is a likely defense response to enhanced blood toxicity, and this behavior resembles the increased production of white blood cells in the case of a bacterial infection. An increased e-GST level in animals is, therefore, an alarm signal that must be followed up by more accurate investigations to assess the chemical nature of the contaminants.

Türkan et al. [ 195 ] studied the toxicological impact of some avermectins on human e-GST. Antiparasitic drugs, including avermectins, are used around the world in the treatment and prevention of parasitic diseases in animals, especially for animals fed externally [ 196 ]. The presence of drug residues in foods and animal products poses a serious risk to public health. The authors investigated the inhibitory effects of these toxic compounds (abamectin, doramectin, eprinomectin, ivermectin, and moxidectin), accumulated in human blood through meat, fruit, and vegetable products, on e-GST, testing them at different concentrations (0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 mM). The avermectins significantly inhibited the GST enzyme at the millimolar level. Therefore, avermectins should be used more carefully in agriculture and livestock.

6. Conclusions

Almost all studies reported in this review support the idea that GSTP1-1 may represent a novel natural and sensible biomarker for many clinical ( Table 4 ) and environmental applications ( Figure 12 ).

Nowadays, the studies about molecular biology and GSTP1 gene polymorphisms in many different human pathologies (e.g., tumors, autoimmune, neurodegenerative and liver diseases) represent only the beginning of a conceivable use of GSTP1 as a clinical marker in biomedicine. Future researches in this field need a great sample size of the patient population examined to derive accurate statistical analyses. In cancer research, the study of structural biology, enzymology, and drug development remain extremely important mainly to inhibit the over-expressed GSTP1-1 and modulate its pro-apoptotic activity.

Furthermore, the over-expression of GSTP1-1 is a strong indication for an increase of circulating toxic compounds. Thus, it can be used to assess the gravity of kidney diseases, the efficiency of depurative procedures like the diffusive and convective dialytic techniques, and the ability of transplanted kidneys to detoxify the blood. The severity of scleroderma, possibly triggered by circulating toxins, is also correlated to the e-GST levels. However, this biosensor does not identify the chemical nature of the toxin that can be identified only through a more accurate chemical analysis. This property is reminiscent of what occurs during a bacterial infection where the increased level of lymphocytes indicates the presence of pathogens but not their identity. A useful characteristic of this biomarker is that it can be assayed in a few minutes by a very simple spectrophotometric procedure using only a few microliters of blood. The enzyme can be also stored for four/five days at 4 °C without losing its activity. Extended studies performed on a large population living in polluted areas were successfully performed giving useful indications on how to identify areas at high pollution risk. In our opinion this will be an interesting and promising field; some Italian municipalities are planning to start screening for GSTP1-1 in the near future.

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to thank Georgia Wilson Jones for revising English version of the manuscript.

Author Contributions

A.B., A.N., and G.R. wrote and conceptualized the manuscript; G.M., G.N., G.C., G.G., and M.D.L. wrote and prepared the draft of the manuscript and figures; N.D.D. reviewed and edited the paper.

Funding

This research was funded by University of Rome Tor Vergata Grant Mission: Sustainability (Decreto Rettorale 2817/2016) to A.B.; Federazione Medico Sportiva Italiana by a financial support to N.D.D.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

References

1. Hayes J.D. Flanagan J.U. Jowsey I.R. Glutathione transferases Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2005 45 51 88 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.45.120403.095857 15822171

2. Sheehan D. Meade G. Foley V.M. Dowd C.A. Structure, function and evolution of glutathione transferases: Implications for classification of non-mammalian members of an ancient enzyme superfamily Biochem. J. 2001 360 1 16 10.1042/bj3600001 11695986 PMC1222196

3. Booth J. Boyland E. Sims P. An enzyme from rat liver catalysing conjugations with glutathione Biochem. J. 1961 79 516 524 10.1042/bj0790516 16748905 PMC1205680

4. Armstrong R.N. Structure, catalytic mechanism, and evolution of the glutathione transferases Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1997 10 2 18 10.1021/tx960072x 9074797

5. Oakley A.J. Lo Bello M. Battistoni A. Ricci G. Rossjohn J. Villar H.O. Parker M.W. The structures of human glutathione transferase P1-1 in complex with glutathione and various inhibitors at high resolution J. Mol. Biol. 1997 274 84 100 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1364 9398518

6. Bocedi A. Fabrini R. Farrotti A. Stella L. Ketterman A.J. Pedersen J.Z. Allocati N. Lau P.C. Grosse S. Eltis L.D. The impact of nitric oxide toxicity on the evolution of the glutathione transferase superfamily: A proposal for an evolutionary driving force J. Biol. Chem. 2013 288 24936 24947 10.1074/jbc.M113.476135 23828197 PMC3750189

7. Habig W.H. Jakoby W.B. Assays for differentiation of glutathione S-transferases Methods Enzymol. 1981 77 398 405 7329316 10.1016/s0076-6879(81)77053-8

8. Johansson K. Jarvliden J. Gogvadze V. Morgenstern R. Multiple roles of microsomal glutathione transferase 1 in cellular protection: A mechanistic study Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2010 49 1638 1645 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.08.013 20727966

9. Hubatsch I. Ridderstrom M. Mannervik B. Human glutathione transferase A4-4: An alpha class enzyme with high catalytic efficiency in the conjugation of 4-hydroxynonenal and other genotoxic products of lipid peroxidation Biochem. J. 1998 330 175 179 10.1042/bj3300175 9461507 PMC1219124

10. Raffalli-Mathieu F. Mannervik B. Human glutathione transferase A3-3 active as steroid double-bond isomerase Methods Enzymol. 2005 401 265 278 10.1016/S0076-6879(05)01017-7 16399392

11. Bartling D. Radzio R. Steiner U. Weiler E.W. A glutathione S-transferase with glutathione-peroxidase activity from Arabidopsis thaliana. Molecular cloning and functional characterization Eur. J. Biochem. 1993 216 579 586 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb18177.x 8375395

12. Cesareo E. Parker L.J. Pedersen J.Z. Nuccetelli M. Mazzetti A.P. Pastore A. Federici G. Caccuri A.M. Ricci G. Adams J.J. Nitrosylation of human glutathione transferase P1-1 with dinitrosyl diglutathionyl iron complex in vitro and in vivo J. Biol. Chem. 2005 280 42172 42180 10.1074/jbc.M507916200 16195232

13. Fabrini R. Bocedi A. Dawood K.F. Turella P. Stella L. Parker M.W. Pedersen J.Z. Federici G. Antonini G. Ricci G. The extended catalysis of glutathione transferase FEBS Lett. 2011 585 341 345 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.12.009 21163259

14. Awasthi Y.C. Singh S.V. Purification and characterization of a new form of glutathione S-transferase from human erythrocytes Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1984 125 1053 1060 10.1016/0006-291X(84)91390-1 6517933

15. Ivanetich K.M. Goold R.D. A rapid equilibrium random sequential bi-bi mechanism for human placental glutathione S-transferase Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1989 998 7 13 10.1016/0167-4838(89)90111-8 2790055

16. Ricci G. Lo Bello M. Caccurri A.M. Pastore A. Nuccetelli M. Parker M.W. Federici G. Site-directed mutagenesis of human glutathione transferase P1-1. Mutation of Cys-47 induces a positive cooperativity in glutathione transferase P1-1 J. Biol. Chem. 1995 270 1243 1248 10.1074/jbc.270.3.1243 7836386

17. Lo Bello M. Parker M.W. Desideri A. Polticelli F. Falconi M. Del Boccio G. Pennelli A. Federici G. Ricci G. Peculiar spectroscopic and kinetic properties of Cys-47 in human placental glutathione transferase. Evidence for an atypical thiolate ion pair near the active site J. Biol. Chem. 1993 268 19033 19038 8360190

18. Lo Bello M. Oakley A.J. Battistoni A. Mazzetti A.P. Nuccetelli M. Mazzarese G. Rossjohn J. Parker M.W. Ricci G. Multifunctional role of Tyr 108 in the catalytic mechanism of human glutathione transferase P1-1. Crystallographic and kinetic studies on the Y108F mutant enzyme Biochemistry 1997 36 6207 6217 10.1021/bi962813z 9166793

19. Nicotra M. Paci M. Sette M. Oakley A.J. Parker M.W. Lo Bello M. Caccuri A.M. Federici G. Ricci G. Solution structure of glutathione bound to human glutathione transferase P1-1: Comparison of NMR measurements with the crystal structure Biochemistry 1998 37 3020 3027 10.1021/bi971902o 9485454

20. Caccuri A.M. Antonini G. Ascenzi P. Nicotra M. Nuccetelli M. Mazzetti A.P. Federici G. Lo Bello M. Ricci G. Temperature adaptation of glutathione S-transferase P1-1. A case for homotropic regulation of substrate binding J. Biol. Chem. 1999 274 19276 19280 10.1074/jbc.274.27.19276 10383436

21. Lo Bello M. Nuccetelli M. Chiessi E. Lahm A. Mazzetti A.P. Battistoni A. Caccuri A.M. Oakley A.J. Parker M.W. Tramontano A. Mutations of Gly to Ala in human glutathione transferase P1-1 affect helix 2 (G-site) and induce positive cooperativity in the binding of glutathione J. Mol. Biol. 1998 284 1717 1725 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2270 9878382

22. Lo Bello M. Nuccetelli M. Caccuri A.M. Stella L. Parker M.W. Rossjohn J. McKinstry W.J. Mozzi A.F. Federici G. Polizio F. Human glutathione transferase P1-1 and nitric oxide carriers; a new role for an old enzyme J. Biol. Chem. 2001 276 42138 42145 10.1074/jbc.M102344200 11533048

23. Becker K. Savvides S.N. Keese M. Schirmer R.H. Karplus P.A. Enzyme inactivation through sulfhydryl oxidation by physiologic NO-carriers Nat. Struct. Biol. 1998 5 267 271 10.1038/nsb0498-267 9546215

24. Ricci G. Caccuri A.M. Lo Bello M. Parker M.W. Nuccetelli M. Turella P. Stella L. Di Iorio E.E. Federici G. Glutathione transferase P1-1: Self-preservation of an anti-cancer enzyme Biochem. J. 2003 376 71 76 10.1042/bj20030860 12877654 PMC1223740

25. Bocedi A. Fabrini R. Lo Bello M. Caccuri A.M. Federici G. Mannervik B. Cornish-Bowden A. Ricci G. Evolution of Negative Cooperativity in Glutathione Transferase Enabled Preservation of Enzyme Function J. Biol. Chem. 2016 291 26739 26749 10.1074/jbc.M116.749507 27815499 PMC5207182

26. Wang T. Arifoglu P. Ronai Z. Tew K.D. Glutathione S-transferase P1-1 (GSTP1-1) inhibits c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK1) signaling through interaction with the C terminus J. Biol. Chem. 2001 276 20999 21003 10.1074/jbc.M101355200 11279197

27. Kampranis S.C. Damianova R. Atallah M. Toby G. Kondi G. Tsichlis P.N. Makris A.M. A novel plant glutathione S-transferase/peroxidase suppresses Bax lethality in yeast J. Biol. Chem. 2000 275 29207 29216 10.1074/jbc.M002359200 10859306

28. Dulhunty A. Gage P. Curtis S. Chelvanayagam G. Board P. The glutathione transferase structural family includes a nuclear chloride channel and a ryanodine receptor calcium release channel modulator J. Biol. Chem. 2001 276 3319 3323 10.1074/jbc.M007874200 11035031

29. Wu Y. Fan Y. Xue B. Luo L. Shen J. Zhang S. Jiang Y. Yin Z. Human glutathione S-transferase P1-1 interacts with TRAF2 and regulates TRAF2-ASK1 signals Oncogene 2006 25 5787 5800 10.1038/sj.onc.1209576 16636664

30. Bartolini D. Commodi J. Piroddi M. Incipini L. Sancineto L. Santi C. Galli F. Glutathione S-transferase pi expression regulates the Nrf2-dependent response to hormetic diselenides Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2015 88 466 480 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.06.039 26151571

31. Fabrini R. Bocedi A. Camerini S. Fusetti M. Ottaviani F. Passali F.M. Topazio D. Iavarone F. Francia I. Castagnola M. Inactivation of human salivary glutathione transferase P1-1 by hypothiocyanite: A post-translational control system in search of a role PLoS ONE 2014 9 e112797 10.1371/journal.pone.0112797 25393952 PMC4231102

32. Fabrini R. Bocedi A. Massoud R. Federici G. Ricci G. Spectrophotometric assay for serum glutathione transferase: A re-examination Clin. Biochem. 2012 45 668 671 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.02.017 22391028

33. Carmagnol F. Sinet P.M. Rapin J. Jerome H. Glutathione-S-transferase of human red blood cells; assay, values in normal subjects and in two pathological circumstances: Hyperbilirubinemia and impaired renal function Clin. Chim. Acta 1981 117 209 217 10.1016/0009-8981(81)90040-1 7307276

34. Mimic-Oka J. Simic T. Djukanovic L. Stefanovski J. Ramic Z. Glutathione and its associated enzymes in peripheral blood cells in different stages of chronic renal insufficiency Amino Acids 1992 2 215 224 10.1007/BF00805943 24192900

35. Pettersen E.F. Goddard T.D. Huang C.C. Couch G.S. Greenblatt D.M. Meng E.C. Ferrin T.E. UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis J. Comput. Chem. 2004 25 1605 1612 10.1002/jcc.20084 15264254

36. Galli F. Rovidati S. Benedetti S. Buoncristiani U. Covarelli C. Floridi A. Canestrari F. Overexpression of erythrocyte glutathione S-transferase in uremia and dialysis Clin. Chem. 1999 45 1781 1788 10508125

37. Kopple J.D. National kidney foundation K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for nutrition in chronic renal failure Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2001 37 S66 S70 10.1053/ajkd.2001.20748 11158865

38. Dessi M. Noce A. Dawood K.F. Galli F. Taccone-Gallucci M. Fabrini R. Bocedi A. Massoud R. Fucci G. Pastore A. Erythrocyte glutathione transferase: A potential new biomarker in chronic kidney diseases which correlates with plasma homocysteine Amino Acids 2012 43 347 354 10.1007/s00726-011-1085-x 21984376

39. Pastore A. Noce A. Di Giovamberardino G. De Stefano A. Calla C. Zenobi R. Dessi M. Di Daniele N. Homocysteine, cysteine, folate and vitamin B(1)(2) status in type 2 diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease J. Nephrol. 2015 28 571 576 10.1007/s40620-014-0126-4 25095762

40. Welch G.N. Loscalzo J. Homocysteine and atherothrombosis N. Engl. J. Med. 1998 338 1042 1050 10.1056/NEJM199804093381507 9535670

41. Noce A. Ferrannini M. Fabrini R. Bocedi A. Dessi M. Galli F. Federici G. Palumbo R. Di Daniele N. Ricci G. Erythrocyte glutathione transferase: A new biomarker for hemodialysis adequacy, overcoming the Kt/V(urea) dogma? Cell Death Dis. 2012 3 e377 10.1038/cddis.2012.112 22914325 PMC3434653

42. Galli F. Piroddi M. Bartolini D. Ciffolilli S. Buoncristiani E. Ricci G. Buoncristiani U. Blood thiol status and erythrocyte glutathione-S-transferase in chronic kidney disease patients on treatment with frequent (daily) hemodialysis Free Radic. Res. 2014 48 273 281 10.3109/10715762.2013.861901 24192047

43. Noce A. Fabrini R. Dessi M. Bocedi A. Santini S. Rovella V. Pastore A. Tesauro M. Bernardini S. Di Daniele N. Erythrocyte glutathione transferase activity: A possible early biomarker for blood toxicity in uremic diabetic patients Acta Diabetol. 2014 51 219 224 10.1007/s00592-013-0497-3 23818012

44. Noce A. Fabrini R. Bocedi A. Di Daniele N. Erythrocyte glutathione transferase in uremic diabetic patients: Additional data Acta Diabetol. 2015 52 813 815 10.1007/s00592-014-0683-y 25399342

45. Tesauro M. Nistico S. Noce A. Tarantino A. Marrone G. Costa A. Rovella V. Di Cola G. Campia U. Lauro D. The possible role of glutathione-S-transferase activity in diabetic nephropathy Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 2015 28 129 133 10.1177/0394632015572564 25816416

46. Velladath S.U. Das A. Rishikesh K. Nalini K. Erythrocyte Glutathione-S-Transferase Activity In Diabetics And Its Association With HBA1c Clin. Biochem. 2011 2 10.9754/journal.wmc.2011.002004

47. Wolfe R.A. Ashby V.B. Milford E.L. Ojo A.O. Ettenger R.E. Agodoa L.Y. Held P.J. Port F.K. Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant N. Engl. J. Med. 1999 341 1725 1730 10.1056/NEJM199912023412303 10580071

48. Laupacis A. Keown P. Pus N. Krueger H. Ferguson B. Wong C. Muirhead N. A study of the quality of life and cost-utility of renal transplantation Kidney Int. 1996 50 235 242 10.1038/ki.1996.307 8807593

49. Bocedi A. Noce A. Rovella V. Marrone G. Cattani G. Iappelli M. De Paolis P. Iaria G. Sforza D. Gallu M. Erythrocyte glutathione transferase in kidney transplantation: A probe for kidney detoxification efficiency Cell Death Dis. 2018 9 288 10.1038/s41419-018-0289-3 29459773 PMC5833821

50. Rovcanin B. Medic B. Kocic G. Cebovic T. Ristic M. Prostran M. Molecular Dissection of Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion: Oxidative Stress and Cellular Events Curr. Med. Chem. 2016 23 1965 1980 10.2174/0929867323666160112122858 26758795

51. Guimaraes J. Araujo A.M. Santos F. Nunes C.S. Casal M. Living-donor and Deceased-donor Renal Transplantation: Differences in Early Outcome--A Single-center Experience Transpl. Proc. 2015 47 958 962 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.03.008 26036494

52. Morozova N. Khrapko K. Panee J. Liu W. Harney J.W. Berry M.J. Glutathione depletion in hippocampal cells increases levels of H and L ferritin and glutathione S-transferase mRNAs Genes Cells 2007 12 561 567 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2007.01074.x 17535247

53. Johnson W.M. Wilson-Delfosse A.L. Mieyal J.J. Dysregulation of glutathione homeostasis in neurodegenerative diseases Nutrients 2012 4 1399 1440 10.3390/nu4101399 23201762 PMC3497002

54. Mazzetti A.P. Fiorile M.C. Primavera A. Lo Bello M. Glutathione transferases and neurodegenerative diseases Neurochem. Int. 2015 82 10 18 10.1016/j.neuint.2015.01.008 25661512

55. Hollman A.L. Tchounwou P.B. Huang H.C. The Association between Gene-Environment Interactions and Diseases Involving the Human GST Superfamily with SNP Variants Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016 13 379 10.3390/ijerph13040379 27043589 PMC4847041

56. Lescuyer P. Allard L. Zimmermann-Ivol C.G. Burgess J.A. Hughes-Frutiger S. Burkhard P.R. Sanchez J.C. Hochstrasser D.F. Identification of post-mortem cerebrospinal fluid proteins as potential biomarkers of ischemia and neurodegeneration Proteomics 2004 4 2234 2241 10.1002/pmic.200300822 15274117

57. Allocati N. Masulli M. Di Ilio C. Federici L. Glutathione transferases: Substrates, inihibitors and pro-drugs in cancer and neurodegenerative diseases Oncogenesis 2018 7 8 10.1038/s41389-017-0025-3 29362397 PMC5833873

58. Deng Y. Newman B. Dunne M.P. Silburn P.A. Mellick G.D. Case-only study of interactions between genetic polymorphisms of GSTM1, P1, T1 and Z1 and smoking in Parkinson’s disease Neurosci. Lett. 2004 366 326 331 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.05.061 15288444

59. Longo G.S. Pinhel M.S. Sado C.L. Gregorio M.L. Amorim G.S. Florim G.S. Mazeti C.M. Martins D.P. Oliveira F.N. Tognola W.A. Exposure to pesticides and heterozygote genotype of GSTP1-Alw26I are associated to Parkinson’s disease Arq. Neuropsiquiatr. 2013 71 446 452 10.1590/0004-282X20130060 23857610

60. Sun K.H. Chang K.H. Clawson S. Ghosh S. Mirzaei H. Regnier F. Shah K. Glutathione-S-transferase P1 is a critical regulator of Cdk5 kinase activity J. Neurochem. 2011 118 902 914 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07343.x 21668448

61. Bernardini S. Bellincampi L. Ballerini S. Federici G. Iori R. Trequattrini A. Ciappi F. Baldinetti F. Bossu P. Caltagirone C. Glutathione S-transferase P1 *C allelic variant increases susceptibility for late-onset Alzheimer disease: Association study and relationship with apolipoprotein E epsilon4 allele Clin. Chem. 2005 51 944 951 10.1373/clinchem.2004.045955 15805147

62. Pinhel M.A. Nakazone M.A. Cacao J.C. Piteri R.C. Dantas R.T. Godoy M.F. Godoy M.R. Tognola W.A. Conforti-Froes N.D. Souza D. Glutathione S-transferase variants increase susceptibility for late-onset Alzheimer’s disease: Association study and relationship with apolipoprotein E epsilon4 allele Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2008 46 439 445 10.1515/CCLM.2008.102 18298341

63. Fisher R.S. Redefining epilepsy Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2015 28 130 135 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000174 25734953

64. Shang W. Liu W.H. Zhao X.H. Sun Q.J. Bi J.Z. Chi Z.F. Expressions of glutathione S-transferase alpha, mu, and pi in brains of medically intractable epileptic patients BMC Neurosci. 2008 9 67 10.1186/1471-2202-9-67 18644106 PMC2490696

65. Kumar A. Dhull D.K. Gupta V. Channana P. Singh A. Bhardwaj M. Ruhal P. Mittal R. Role of Glutathione-S-transferases in neurological problems Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2017 27 299 309 10.1080/13543776.2017.1254192 27785931

66. Kiernan M.C. Vucic S. Cheah B.C. Turner M.R. Eisen A. Hardiman O. Burrell J.R. Zoing M.C. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis Lancet 2011 377 942 955 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61156-7 21296405

67. Eum K.D. Seals R.M. Taylor K.M. Grespin M. Umbach D.M. Hu H. Sandler D.P. Kamel F. Weisskopf M.G. Modification of the association between lead exposure and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis by iron and oxidative stress related gene polymorphisms Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. Front. Degener. 2015 16 72 79 10.3109/21678421.2014.964259 25293352 PMC4467726

68. Usarek E. Gajewska B. Kazmierczak B. Kuzma M. Dziewulska D. Baranczyk-Kuzma A. A study of glutathione S-transferase pi expression in central nervous system of subjects with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis using RNA extraction from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded material Neurochem. Res. 2005 30 1003 1007 10.1007/s11064-005-6771-1 16258849

69. Wood S.J. Yucel M. Pantelis C. Berk M. Neurobiology of schizophrenia spectrum disorders: The role of oxidative stress Ann. Acad Med. Singap. 2009 38 396 19521638

70. Chowdari K.V. Bamne M.N. Nimgaonkar V.L. Genetic association studies of antioxidant pathway genes and schizophrenia Antioxid Redox Signal. 2011 15 2037 2045 10.1089/ars.2010.3508 20673164 PMC3159115

71. Sarkhel S. Alcott Sadoc V. Kaplan and Sadock’s Synopsis of Psychiatry: Behavioral Sciences/Clinical Psychiatry 10th ed. Philadelphia Indian Philadelphia, PA, USA 2009 Volume 51 1 1470

72. Rund B.R. Is schizophrenia a neurodegenerative disorder? Nord. J. Psychiatry 2009 63 196 201 10.1080/08039480902767286 19235629

73. Prokhorova T.A. Tereshkina E.B. Savushkina O.K. Boksha I.S. Vorobyeva E.A. Omel’chenko M.A. Pomytkin A.N. Kaleda V.G. Burbaeva G.S. [The activity of enzymes of glutathione metabolism in blood cells of patients with a high risk of manifestation of endogenous psychoses and patients with the first psychotic episode] Zh. Nevrol. Psikhiatr. Im. S S Korsakova 2019 119 47 54 10.17116/jnevro201911904147 31156222

74. Savushkina O.K. Boksha I.S. Prokhorova T.A. Tereshkina E.B. Burminskiy D.S. Morozova M.A. Vorobyeva E.A. Burbaeva G.S. [The activity of erythrocyte and platelet glutathione reductase and glutathione-S-transferase in paranoid schizophrenia] Zh. Nevrol. Psikhiatr. Im. S S Korsakova 2018 118 77 81 10.17116/jnevro201811811177 30585609

75. Gravina P. Spoletini I. Masini S. Valentini A. Vanni D. Paladini E. Bossu P. Caltagirone C. Federici G. Spalletta G. Genetic polymorphisms of glutathione S-transferases GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1 and GSTA1 as risk factors for schizophrenia Psychiatry Res. 2011 187 454 456 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.10.008 21093063

76. Pae C.U. Kim J.J. Lee S.J. Lee C.U. Lee C. Paik I.H. Park H.R. Yang S. Serretti A. Association study between glutathione S-transferase P1 polymorphism and schizophrenia in the Korean population Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2003 27 519 523 10.1016/S0278-5846(03)00043-5 12691788

77. Lord C. Cook E.H. Leventhal B.L. Amaral D.G. Autism spectrum disorders Neuron 2000 28 355 363 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00115-X 11144346

78. Rahbar M.H. Samms-Vaughan M. Ma J. Bressler J. Loveland K.A. Hessabi M. Dickerson A.S. Grove M.L. Shakespeare-Pellington S. Beecher C. Interaction between GSTT1 and GSTP1 allele variants as a risk modulating-factor for autism spectrum disorders Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 2015 12 1 9 10.1016/j.rasd.2014.12.008 25685181 PMC4322427

79. LeRoy E.C. Black C. Fleischmajer R. Jablonska S. Krieg T. Medsger T.A. Jr. Rowell N. Wollheim F. Scleroderma (systemic sclerosis): Classification, subsets and pathogenesis J. Rheumatol. 1988 15 202 205 3361530

80. Broen J.C. Coenen M.J. Radstake T.R. Genetics of systemic sclerosis: An update Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 2012 14 11 21 10.1007/s11926-011-0221-7 22102179 PMC3253992

81. Fietta A. Bardoni A. Salvini R. Passadore I. Morosini M. Cavagna L. Codullo V. Pozzi E. Meloni F. Montecucco C. Analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid proteome from systemic sclerosis patients with or without functional, clinical and radiological signs of lung fibrosis Arthritis Res. Ther. 2006 8 R160 10.1186/ar2067 17044913 PMC1794502

82. Medsger T.A. Jr. Bombardieri S. Czirjak L. Scorza R. Della Rossa A. Bencivelli W. Assessment of disease severity and prognosis Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2003 21 S42 S46 12889222

83. Valentini G. Silman A.J. Veale D. Assessment of disease activity Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2003 21 S39 S41 12889221

84. Fabrini R. Rosato E. Gigante A. Bocedi A. Cianci R. Barbano B. Del Grosso E. Ricci F. Zingaretti V. Salsano F. Erythrocyte glutathione transferase: A non-antibody biomarker for systemic sclerosis, which correlates with severity and activity of the disease Cell Death Dis. 2013 4 e736 10.1038/cddis.2013.255 23887627 PMC3730426

85. Rose N.R. Prediction and Prevention of Autoimmune Disease in the 21st Century: A Review and Preview Am. J. Epidemiol. 2016 183 403 406 10.1093/aje/kwv292 26888748

86. Glesse N. Rohr P. Monticielo O.A. Rech T.F. Brenol J.C. Xavier R.M. Kvitko K. Chies J.A. Genetic polymorphisms of glutathione S-transferases and cytochrome P450 enzymes as susceptibility factors to systemic lupus erythematosus in southern Brazilian patients Mol. Biol. Rep. 2014 41 6167 6179 10.1007/s11033-014-3496-8 24981927

87. Song G.G. Bae S.C. Lee Y.H. The glutathione S-transferase M1 and P1 polymorphisms and rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-analysis Mol. Biol. Rep. 2012 39 10739 10745 10.1007/s11033-012-1965-5 23053970

88. Agundez J.A. Garcia-Martin E. Martinez C. Benito-Leon J. Millan-Pascual J. Diaz-Sanchez M. Calleja P. Pisa D. Turpin-Fenoll L. Alonso-Navarro H. The GSTP1 gene variant rs1695 is not associated with an increased risk of multiple sclerosis Cell Mol. Immunol. 2015 12 777 779 10.1038/cmi.2014.121 25531394 PMC4716624

89. Salminen L.E. Paul R.H. Oxidative stress and genetic markers of suboptimal antioxidant defense in the aging brain: A theoretical review Rev. Neurosci. 2014 25 805 819 10.1515/revneuro-2014-0046 25153586 PMC6378111

90. Neefjes V.M. Evelo C.T. Baars L.G. Blanco C.E. Erythrocyte glutathione S transferase as a marker of oxidative stress at birth Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1999 81 F130 F133 10.1136/fn.81.2.F130 10448182 PMC1720996

91. Circu M.L. Aw T.Y. Glutathione and modulation of cell apoptosis Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012 1823 1767 1777 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.06.019 22732297 PMC3437743

92. Milic M. Frustaci A. Del Bufalo A. Sanchez-Alarcon J. Valencia-Quintana R. Russo P. Bonassi S. DNA damage in non-communicable diseases: A clinical and epidemiological perspective Mutat. Res. 2015 776 118 127 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2014.11.009 26255943

93. Wang G. Walker S.O. Hong X. Bartell T.R. Wang X. Epigenetics and early life origins of chronic noncommunicable diseases J. Adolesc. Health 2013 52 S14 S21 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.04.019 23332566

94. Gouda M. Moustafa A. Hussein L. Hamza M. Three week dietary intervention using apricots, pomegranate juice or/and fermented sour sobya and impact on biomarkers of antioxidative activity, oxidative stress and erythrocytic glutathione transferase activity among adults Nutr. J. 2016 15 52 10.1186/s12937-016-0173-x 27175476 PMC4864915

95. Noce A. Marrone G. Di Daniele F. Ottaviani E. Wilson Jones G. Bernini R. Romani A. Rovella V. Impact of Gut Microbiota Composition on Onset and Progression of Chronic Non-Communicable Diseases Nutrients 2019 11 1073 10.3390/nu11051073 31091761 PMC6567014

96. Noce A. Vidiri M.F. Marrone G. Moriconi E. Bocedi A. Capria A. Rovella V. Ricci G. De Lorenzo A. Di Daniele N. Is low-protein diet a possible risk factor of malnutrition in chronic kidney disease patients? Cell Death Discov. 2016 2 16026 10.1038/cddiscovery.2016.26 27551517 PMC4979484

97. Mariani E. Polidori M.C. Cherubini A. Mecocci P. Oxidative stress in brain aging, neurodegenerative and vascular diseases: An overview J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2005 827 65 75 10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.04.023 16183338

98. Muller F.L. Lustgarten M.S. Jang Y. Richardson A. Van Remmen H. Trends in oxidative aging theories Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2007 43 477 503 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2007.03.034 17640558

99. Clarke D.D. Sokoloff L. Ch. 31 Circulation and Energy Metabolism of the Brain Basic Neurochemistry: Molecular, Cellular, and Medical Aspects 6th ed. Siegel G.J. Agranoff B.W. Albers R.W. Fisher S.K. Uhler M.D. Philadelphia Indian Philadelphia, PA, USA 1999 637 671

100. Dringen R. Metabolism and functions of glutathione in brain Prog. Neurobiol. 2000 62 649 671 10.1016/S0301-0082(99)00060-X 10880854

101. Hensley K. Robinson K.A. Gabbita S.P. Salsman S. Floyd R.A. Reactive oxygen species, cell signaling, and cell injury Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2000 28 1456 1462 10.1016/S0891-5849(00)00252-5 10927169

102. Storz P. Mitochondrial ROS--radical detoxification, mediated by protein kinase D Trends Cell Biol. 2007 17 13 18 10.1016/j.tcb.2006.11.003 17126550

103. Lin M.T. Beal M.F. Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in neurodegenerative diseases Nature 2006 443 787 795 10.1038/nature05292 17051205

104. Hayes J.D. Strange R.C. Glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms and their biological consequences Pharmacology 2000 61 154 166 10.1159/000028396 10971201

105. McIlwain C.C. Townsend D.M. Tew K.D. Glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms: cancer incidence and therapy Oncogene 2006 25 1639 1648 10.1038/sj.onc.1209373 16550164 PMC6361140

106. Chatterjee A. Gupta S. The multifaceted role of glutathione S-transferases in cancer Cancer Lett. 2018 433 33 42 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.06.028 29959055

107. Tew K.D. Manevich Y. Grek C. Xiong Y. Uys J. Townsend D.M. The role of glutathione S-transferase P in signaling pathways and S-glutathionylation in cancer Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2011 51 299 313 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.04.013 21558000 PMC3125017

108. Pasello M. Michelacci F. Scionti I. Hattinger C.M. Zuntini M. Caccuri A.M. Scotlandi K. Picci P. Serra M. Overcoming glutathione S-transferase P1-related cisplatin resistance in osteosarcoma Cancer Res. 2008 68 6661 6668 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5840 18701490

109. Sau A. Pellizzari Tregno F. Valentino F. Federici G. Caccuri A.M. Glutathione transferases and development of new principles to overcome drug resistance Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2010 500 116 122 10.1016/j.abb.2010.05.012 20494652

110. Mignani S. El Brahmi N. El Kazzouli S. Eloy L. Courilleau D. Caron J. Bousmina M.M. Caminade A.M. Cresteil T. Majoral J.P. A novel class of ethacrynic acid derivatives as promising drug-like potent generation of anticancer agents with established mechanism of action Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016 122 656 673 10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.05.063 27448922

111. Wu J.H. Batist G. Glutathione and glutathione analogues; therapeutic potentials Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013 1830 3350 3353 10.1016/j.bbagen.2012.11.016 23201199

112. Galal A.M. Walker L.A. Khan I.A. Induction of GST and related events by dietary phytochemicals: Sources, chemistry, and possible contribution to chemoprevention Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2015 14 2802 2821 10.2174/1568026615666141208110721 25487008

113. Harshbarger W. Gondi S. Ficarro S.B. Hunter J. Udayakumar D. Gurbani D. Singer W.D. Liu Y. Li L. Marto J.A. Structural and Biochemical Analyses Reveal the Mechanism of Glutathione S-Transferase Pi 1 Inhibition by the Anti-cancer Compound Piperlongumine J. Biol. Chem. 2017 292 112 120 10.1074/jbc.M116.750299 27872191 PMC5217671

114. Johansson K. Ito M. Schophuizen C.M. Mathew Thengumtharayil S. Heuser V.D. Zhang J. Shimoji M. Vahter M. Ang W.H. Dyson P.J. Characterization of new potential anticancer drugs designed to overcome glutathione transferase mediated resistance Mol. Pharm. 2011 8 1698 1708 10.1021/mp2000692 21851097

115. Qu Y. Dang S. Hou P. Gene methylation in gastric cancer Clin. Chim. Acta 2013 424 53 65 10.1016/j.cca.2013.05.002 23669186

116. Gurioli G. Martignano F. Salvi S. Costantini M. Gunelli R. Casadio V. GSTP1 methylation in cancer: A liquid biopsy biomarker? Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2018 56 702 717 10.1515/cclm-2017-0703 29305565

117. Lourenco G.J. Neri I.A. Sforni V.C. Kameo R. Lorand-Metze I. Lima C.S. Polymorphisms of glutathione S-transferase Mu 1, glutathione S-transferase theta 1 and glutathione S-transferase Pi 1 genes in Hodgkin’s lymphoma susceptibility and progression Leuk. Lymphoma 2009 50 1005 1009 10.1080/10428190902878455 19391035

118. Sailaja K. Surekha D. Rao D.N. Rao D.R. Vishnupriya S. Association of the GSTP1 gene (Ile105Val) polymorphism with chronic myeloid leukemia Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2010 11 461 464 20843134

119. Dunna N.R. Vuree S. Kagita S. Surekha D. Digumarti R. Rajappa S. Satti V. Association of GSTP1 gene (I105V) polymorphism with acute leukaemia J. Genet. 2012 91 e60 e63 10.1007/s12041-012-0147-5 22552346

120. Schnekenburger M. Karius T. Diederich M. Regulation of epigenetic traits of the glutathione S-transferase P1 gene: From detoxification toward cancer prevention and diagnosis Front. Pharmacol. 2014 5 170 10.3389/fphar.2014.00170 25076909 PMC4100573

121. Dasgupta R.K. Adamson P.J. Davies F.E. Rollinson S. Roddam P.L. Ashcroft A.J. Dring A.M. Fenton J.A. Child J.A. Allan J.M. Polymorphic variation in GSTP1 modulates outcome following therapy for multiple myeloma Blood 2003 102 2345 2350 10.1182/blood-2003-02-0444 12791655

122. Kilburn L. Okcu M.F. Wang T. Cao Y. Renfro-Spelman A. Aldape K.D. Gilbert M.R. Bondy M. Glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms are associated with survival in anaplastic glioma patients Cancer 2010 116 2242 2249 10.1002/cncr.25006 20187096 PMC2861043

123. Lai R. Crevier L. Thabane L. Genetic polymorphisms of glutathione S-transferases and the risk of adult brain tumors: A meta-analysis Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2005 14 1784 1790 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0105 16030117

124. Lu S. Wang Z. Cui D. Liu H. Hao X. Glutathione S-transferase P1 Ile105Val polymorphism and breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis involving 34,658 subjects Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2011 125 253 259 10.1007/s10549-010-0969-x 20526737

125. Yang G. Shu X.O. Ruan Z.X. Cai Q.Y. Jin F. Gao Y.T. Zheng W. Genetic polymorphisms in glutathione-S-transferase genes (GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1) and survival after chemotherapy for invasive breast carcinoma Cancer 2005 103 52 58 10.1002/cncr.20729 15565566

126. Yang F. Gao B. Li R. Li W. Chen W. Yu Z. Zhang J. Expression levels of resistant genes affect cervical cancer prognosis Mol. Med. Rep. 2017 15 2802 2806 10.3892/mmr.2017.6328 28447725

127. Coughlin S.S. Hall I.J. Glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms and risk of ovarian cancer: a HuGE review Genet. Med. 2002 4 250 257 10.1097/00125817-200207000-00003 12172391

128. Diaz-Padilla I. Amir E. Marsh S. Liu G. Mackay H. Genetic polymorphisms as predictive and prognostic biomarkers in gynecological cancers: A systematic review Gynecol. Oncol. 2012 124 354 365 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.10.034 22063461

129. Chan Q.K. Khoo U.S. Ngan H.Y. Yang C.Q. Xue W.C. Chan K.Y. Chiu P.M. Ip P.P. Cheung A.N. Single nucleotide polymorphism of pi-class glutathione s-transferase and susceptibility to endometrial carcinoma Clin. Cancer Res. 2005 11 2981 2985 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2038 15837751

130. Pernar C.H. Ebot E.M. Wilson K.M. Mucci L.A. The Epidemiology of Prostate Cancer Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2018 8 10.1101/cshperspect.a030361 PMC6280714 29311132

131. Kanwal R. Pandey M. Bhaskaran N. Maclennan G.T. Fu P. Ponsky L.E. Gupta S. Protection against oxidative DNA damage and stress in human prostate by glutathione S-transferase P1 Mol. Carcinog. 2014 53 8 18 10.1002/mc.21939 22833520 PMC4018746

132. Simic T. Savic-Radojevic A. Pljesa-Ercegovac M. Matic M. Mimic-Oka J. Glutathione S-transferases in kidney and urinary bladder tumors Nat. Rev. Urol. 2009 6 281 289 10.1038/nrurol.2009.49 19424176

133. Lafuente A. Rodriguez A. Gibanel R. Lafuente M.J. Alonso M. Molina R. Ballesta A. Carretero P. Limitations in the use of glutathione S-transferase P1 in urine as a marker for bladder cancer Anticancer. Res. 1998 18 3771 3772 9854493

134. Berendsen C.L. Mulder T.P. Peters W.H. Plasma glutathione S-transferase pi 1-1 AND alpha 1-1 levels in patients with bladder cancer J. Urol. 2000 164 2126 2128 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66982-0 11061940

135. Jankova L. Robertson G. Chan C. Tan K.L. Kohonen-Corish M. Fung C.L. Clarke C. Lin B.P. Molloy M. Chapuis P.H. Glutathione S-transferase Pi expression predicts response to adjuvant chemotherapy for stage C colon cancer: A matched historical control study BMC Cancer 2012 12 196 10.1186/1471-2407-12-196 22639861 PMC3420323

136. Gao Y. Pan X. Su T. Mo Z. Cao Y. Gao F. Glutathione S-transferase P1 Ile105Val polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk: A meta-analysis and HuGE review Eur. J. Cancer 2009 45 3303 3314 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.06.029 19643601

137. Economopoulos K.P. Sergentanis T.N. GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1, GSTA1 and colorectal cancer risk: A comprehensive meta-analysis Eur. J. Cancer 2010 46 1617 1631 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.009 20207535

138. Crew K.D. Neugut A.I. Epidemiology of gastric cancer World J. Gastroenterol. 2006 12 354 362 10.3748/wjg.v12.i3.354 16489633 PMC4066052

139. de Araujo R.M. de Melo C.F. Neto F.M. da Silva J.N. Soares L.F. de Arruda Cardoso Smith M. Sousa E.C. Jr. Burbano R.M. de Medeiros A.C. Lima E.M. Association study of SNPs of genes IFNGR1 (rs137854905), GSTT1 (rs71748309), and GSTP1 (rs1695) in gastric cancer development in samples of patient in the northern and northeastern Brazil Tumour. Biol. 2014 35 4983 4986 10.1007/s13277-014-1656-z 24453034

140. Xu Z. Zhu H. Luk J.M. Wu D. Gu D. Gong W. Tan Y. Zhou J. Tang J. Zhang Z. Clinical significance of SOD2 and GSTP1 gene polymorphisms in Chinese patients with gastric cancer Cancer 2012 118 5489 5496 10.1002/cncr.27599 22517484

141. Nguyen T.V. Janssen M.J. van Oijen M.G. Bergevoet S.M. te Morsche R.H. van Asten H. Laheij R.J. Peters W.H. Jansent J.B. Genetic polymorphisms in GSTA1, GSTP1, GSTT1, and GSTM1 and gastric cancer risk in a Vietnamese population Oncol. Res. 2010 18 349 355 10.3727/096504010X12626118080064 20377137

142. Li Q.F. Yao R.Y. Liu K.W. Lv H.Y. Jiang T. Liang J. Genetic polymorphism of GSTP1: Prediction of clinical outcome to oxaliplatin/5-FU-based chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer J. Korean Med. Sci. 2010 25 846 852 10.3346/jkms.2010.25.6.846 20514304 PMC2877230

143. Ogino S. Konishi H. Ichikawa D. Matsubara D. Shoda K. Arita T. Kosuga T. Komatsu S. Shiozaki A. Okamoto K. Glutathione S-transferase Pi 1 is a valuable predictor for cancer drug resistance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma Cancer Sci. 2019 110 795 804 10.1111/cas.13896 30499150 PMC6361570

144. Wu X. Gu J. Wu T.T. Swisher S.G. Liao Z. Correa A.M. Liu J. Etzel C.J. Amos C.I. Huang M. Genetic variations in radiation and chemotherapy drug action pathways predict clinical outcomes in esophageal cancer J. Clin. Oncol. 2006 24 3789 3798 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.6640 16785472

145. Hiyama T. Yoshihara M. Tanaka S. Chayama K. Genetic polymorphisms and esophageal cancer risk Int. J. Cancer 2007 121 1643 1658 10.1002/ijc.23044 17674367

146. Jiao L. Bondy M.L. Hassan M.M. Chang D.Z. Abbruzzese J.L. Evans D.B. Smolensky M.H. Li D. Glutathione S-transferase gene polymorphisms and risk and survival of pancreatic cancer Cancer 2007 109 840 848 10.1002/cncr.22468 17265526 PMC1892189

147. Tezuka S. Ueno M. Kobayashi S. Morimoto M. Ohkawa S. Hirotani A. Tozuka Y. Moriya S. Nakamura Y. Miyagi Y. Predictive value of ERCC1, ERCC2, ERCC4, and glutathione S-Transferase Pi expression for the efficacy and safety of FOLFIRINOX in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer Am. J. Cancer Res. 2018 8 2096 2105 30416859 PMC6220150

148. Lu C. Spitz M.R. Zhao H. Dong Q. Truong M. Chang J.Y. Blumenschein G.R. Jr. Hong W.K. Wu X. Association between glutathione S-transferase pi polymorphisms and survival in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma Cancer 2006 106 441 447 10.1002/cncr.21619 16342067

149. Ada A.O. Kunak S.C. Hancer F. Bilgen S. Suzen S.H. Alpar S. Gulhan M. Kurt B. Iscan M. CYP and GST polymorphisms and survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients Neoplasma 2010 57 512 521 10.4149/neo_2010_06_512 20845989

150. Ye Z. Song H. Higgins J.P. Pharoah P. Danesh J. Five glutathione s-transferase gene variants in 23,452 cases of lung cancer and 30,397 controls: Meta-analysis of 130 studies PLoS Med. 2006 3 e91 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030091 16509765 PMC1391981

151. Linares M.A. Zakaria A. Nizran P. Skin Cancer Prim. Care 2015 42 645 659 10.1016/j.pop.2015.07.006 26612377

152. Lei Z. Liu T. Li X. Xu X. Fan D. Contribution of glutathione S-transferase gene polymorphisms to development of skin cancer Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2015 8 377 386 25785008 PMC4358463

153. Ibarrola-Villava M. Martin-Gonzalez M. Lazaro P. Pizarro A. Lluch A. Ribas G. Role of glutathione S-transferases in melanoma susceptibility: Association with GSTP1 rs1695 polymorphism Br. J. Dermatol. 2012 166 1176 1183 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10831.x 22251241

154. Hsu L.I. Wu M.M. Wang Y.H. Lee C.Y. Yang T.Y. Hsiao B.Y. Chen C.J. Association of Environmental Arsenic Exposure, Genetic Polymorphisms of Susceptible Genes, and Skin Cancers in Taiwan Biomed Res. Int. 2015 2015 892579 10.1155/2015/892579 26295053 PMC4532812

155. Ottaviani G. Jaffe N. The epidemiology of osteosarcoma Cancer Treat. Res. 2009 152 3 13 10.1007/978-1-4419-0284-9_1 20213383

156. Qu W.R. Wu J. Li R. Contribution of the GSTP1 gene polymorphism to the development of osteosarcoma in a Chinese population Genet. Mol. Res. 2016 15 10.4238/gmr.15038034 27525908

157. Wang Z. Xu H. He M. Wu H. Zhu Y. Su Z. The association of glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms in patients with osteosarcoma: Evidence from a meta-analysis Eur. J. Cancer Care (Engl.) 2015 24 417 424 10.1111/ecc.12197 24689813

158. Liu S. Yi Z. Ling M. Shi J. Qiu Y. Yang S. Predictive potential of ABCB1, ABCC3, and GSTP1 gene polymorphisms on osteosarcoma survival after chemotherapy Tumour Biol. 2014 35 9897 9904 10.1007/s13277-014-1917-x 24996541

159. Yang B. Guo M. Herman J.G. Clark D.P. Aberrant promoter methylation profiles of tumor suppressor genes in hepatocellular carcinoma Am. J. Pathol. 2003 163 1101 1107 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63469-4 12937151 PMC1868243

160. Sakaida I. Kubota M. Kayano K. Takenaka K. Mori K. Okita K. Prevention of fibrosis reduces enzyme-altered lesions in the rat liver Carcinogenesis 1994 15 2201 2206 10.1093/carcin/15.10.2201 7955054

161. Sakaida I. Hironaka K. Uchida K. Suzuki C. Kayano K. Okita K. Fibrosis accelerates the development of enzyme-altered lesions in the rat liver Hepatology 1998 28 1247 1252 10.1002/hep.510280512 9794908

162. Sakaida I. Hironaka K. Uchida K. Okita K. Loss of inhibitory growth regulation by TGF-beta1 in preneoplastic lesions in rat liver Dig. Dis. Sci. 2000 45 325 333 10.1023/A:1005464610585 10711446

163. Bertuccio P. Turati F. Carioli G. Rodriguez T. La Vecchia C. Malvezzi M. Negri E. Global trends and predictions in hepatocellular carcinoma mortality J. Hepatol. 2017 67 302 309 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.03.011 28336466

164. Orru C. Szydlowska M. Taguchi K. Zavattari P. Perra A. Yamamoto M. Columbano A. Genetic inactivation of Nrf2 prevents clonal expansion of initiated cells in a nutritional model of rat hepatocarcinogenesis J. Hepatol. 2018 69 635 643 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.05.010 29758334

165. Kin M. Torimura T. Ueno T. Nakamura T. Ogata R. Sakamoto M. Tamaki S. Sata M. Angiogenesis inhibitor TNP-470 suppresses the progression of experimentally-induced hepatocellular carcinoma in rats Int. J. Oncol. 2000 16 375 382 10.3892/ijo.16.2.375 10639583

166. Perra A. Pibiri M. Sulas P. Simbula G. Ledda-Columbano G.M. Columbano A. Alpha-lipoic acid promotes the growth of rat hepatic pre-neoplastic lesions in the choline-deficient model Carcinogenesis 2008 29 161 168 10.1093/carcin/bgm205 17893235

167. Lee T.Y. Kim K.T. Han S.Y. Expression of ErbB receptor proteins and TGF-alpha during diethylnitrosamine-induced hepatocarcinogenesis in the rat liver Korean J. Hepatol. 2007 13 70 80 17380077

168. Chen Y.L. Tseng H.S. Kuo W.H. Yang S.F. Chen D.R. Tsai H.T. Glutathione S-Transferase P1 (GSTP1) gene polymorphism increases age-related susceptibility to hepatocellular carcinoma BMC Med. Genet. 2010 11 46 10.1186/1471-2350-11-46 20331903 PMC2851593

169. Li Y. Cai Y. Chen H. Mao L. Clinical significance and association of GSTP1 hypermethylation with hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis J. Cancer Res. Ther. 2018 14 S486 S489 10.4103/0973-1482.181179 29970711

170. Wang Z. Qu K. Niu W. Lin T. Xu X. Huang Z. Liu S. Liu S. Chang H. Liu Y. Glutathione S-transferase P1 gene rs4147581 polymorphism predicts overall survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Evidence from an enlarged study Tumour Biol. 2016 37 943 952 10.1007/s13277-015-3871-7 26260272

171. Kelishadi R. Mirghaffari N. Poursafa P. Gidding S.S. Lifestyle and environmental factors associated with inflammation, oxidative stress and insulin resistance in children Atherosclerosis 2009 203 311 319 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.06.022 18692848

172. Kelishadi R. Poursafa P. Air pollution and non-respiratory health hazards for children Arch. Med. Sci. 2010 6 483 495 10.5114/aoms.2010.14458 22371790 PMC3284061

173. van der Oost R. Beyer J. Vermeulen N.P. Fish bioaccumulation and biomarkers in environmental risk assessment: A review Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2003 13 57 149 10.1016/S1382-6689(02)00126-6 21782649

174. Rudneva I.I. Kuzminova N.S. Skuratovskaya E.N. Glutathione-S-Transferase Activity in Tissues of Black Sea Fish Species Asian J. Exp. Biol. Sci. 2010 1 141 150

175. Sen A. Kirikbakan A. Biochemical characterization and distribution of glutathione S-transferases in leaping mullet (Liza saliens) Biochemistry (Mosc.) 2004 69 993 1000 10.1023/B:BIRY.0000043541.80075.fd 15521813

176. Slatinska I. Smutna M. Havelkova M. Svobodova Z. Biochemical markers of aquatic pollution in fish-glutathione S-transferase Folia Vet. Lat. 2008 52 129 134

177. Fabrini R. Bocedi A. Del Grosso E. Morici L. Federici G. Palleschi A. Ricci G. Erythrocyte glutathione transferase: A novel biomarker to check environmental pollution hazardous for humans Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2012 426 71 75 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.08.037 22910412

178. Ansari G.A. Singh S.V. Gan J.C. Awasthi Y.C. Human erythrocyte glutathione S-transferase: A possible marker of chemical exposure Toxicol Lett. 1987 37 57 62 10.1016/0378-4274(87)90167-6 3296321

179. Singh S.V. Awasthi Y.C. Inhibition of human glutathione S-transferases by 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetate (2,4-D) and 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetate (2,4,5-T) Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1985 81 328 336 10.1016/0041-008X(85)90170-X 4060158

180. Kilpikari I. Savolainen H. Decreased erythrocyte glutathione s-transferase activity in rubber workers Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 1984 53 299 302 10.1007/BF00380668 6715053

181. Primavera A. Fustinoni S. Biroccio A. Ballerini S. Urbani A. Bernardini S. Federici G. Capucci E. Manno M. Lo Bello M. Glutathione transferases and glutathionylated hemoglobin in workers exposed to low doses of 1,3-butadiene Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2008 17 3004 3012 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0443 18990742

182. Dai X. Bowatte G. Lowe A.J. Matheson M.C. Gurrin L.C. Burgess J.A. Dharmage S.C. Lodge C.J. Do Glutathione S-Transferase Genes Modify the Link between Indoor Air Pollution and Asthma, Allergies, and Lung Function? A Systematic Review Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 2018 18 20 10.1007/s11882-018-0771-0 29557517

183. Sharma R.K. Upadhyay G. Siddiqi N.J. Sharma B. Pesticides-induced biochemical alterations in occupational North Indian suburban population Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2013 32 1213 1227 10.1177/0960327112474835 23424210

184. Orhan H. Evelo C.T. Sahin G. Erythrocyte antioxidant defense response against cigarette smoking in humans--the glutathione S-transferase vulnerability J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 2005 19 226 233 10.1002/jbt.20088 16173057

185. Evelo C.T. Henderson P.T. Biological effect monitoring Arch. Toxicol. Suppl. 1992 15 268 277 1510597 10.1007/978-3-642-77260-3_35

186. Mecdad A. Ahmed M. ElHalwagy M. Afify M. A Study on Oxidative Stress Biomarkers and Immunomodulatory Effects of Pesticides in Pesticide-Sprayers Egypt. J. Forensic Sci. 2011 1 93 98 10.1016/j.ejfs.2011.04.012

187. Hegazi M.M. Attia Z.I. Ashour O.A. Oxidative stress and antioxidant enzymes in liver and white muscle of Nile tilapia juveniles in chronic ammonia exposure Aquat. Toxicol. 2010 99 118 125 10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.04.007 20434782

188. Vos R.M. Van Bladeren P.J. Glutathione S-transferases in relation to their role in the biotransformation of xenobiotics Chem. Biol. Interact. 1990 75 241 265 10.1016/0009-2797(90)90069-Y 2199083

189. Boyland E. Chasseaud L.F. The role of glutathione and glutathione S-transferases in mercapturic acid biosynthesis Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol. 1969 32 173 219 4892500 10.1002/9780470122778.ch5

190. Ketley J.N. Habig W.H. Jakoby W.B. Binding of nonsubstrate ligands to the glutathione S-transferases J. Biol. Chem. 1975 250 8670 8673 1184584

191. Awasthi Y.C. Garg H.S. Dao D.D. Partridge C.A. Srivastava S.K. Enzymatic conjugation of erythrocyte glutathione with 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene: The fate of glutathione conjugate in erythrocytes and the effect of glutathione depletion on hemoglobin Blood 1981 58 733 738 7272504

192. Hayes J.D. Pulford D.J. The glutathione S-transferase supergene family: Regulation of GST and the contribution of the isoenzymes to cancer chemoprotection and drug resistance Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1995 30 445 600 10.3109/10409239509083491 8770536

193. Vodela J.K. Dalvi R.R. Erythrocyte glutathione-S-transferase activity in animal species Vet. Hum. Toxicol. 1997 39 9 11 9004459

194. Bocedi A. Fabrini R. Lai O. Alfieri L. Roncoroni C. Noce A. Pedersen J.Z. Ricci G. Erythrocyte glutathione transferase: A general probe for chemical contaminations in mammals Cell Death Discov. 2016 2 16029 10.1038/cddiscovery.2016.29 27551520 PMC4979413

195. Turkan F. Huyut Z. Atalar M.N. The toxicological impact of some avermectins on human erythrocytes glutathione S-transferase enzyme J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 2018 32 e22205 10.1002/jbt.22205 30091233

196. Kose L.P. Gulcin I. Ozdemir H. Atasever A. Alwasel S.H. Supuran C.T. The effects of some avermectins on bovine carbonic anhydrase enzyme J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2016 31 773 778 10.3109/14756366.2015.1064406 26207514