Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2014
Evaluation of plasma eosinophil count and mean platelet volume in patients with coronary slow flow.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Demir Mehmet, Coşar Selvi, Melek Mehmet
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The pathophysiology of coronary slow flow has not been clearly defined, although multiple abnormalities including arteritis, endothelial dysfunction, and atherothrombosis, have been reported. It is known that eosinophils play an important role in inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and thrombosis. We aimed to compare the eosinophil counts of coronary slow flow patients versus healthy controls.
METHODS: This study included 50 coronary slow flow patients (19 males, mean age 65.6 ± 13.7 years) and 30 healthy controls (10 males, mean age 57.86 ± 11.6 years). These participants were evaluated using concurrent routine biochemical tests as well as neutrophil, lymphocyte, and eosinophil counts and mean platelet volume (MPV), which were obtained from the whole blood count. These parameters were compared between groups.
RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the study groups were comparable. The coronary slow flow patients had a higher mean platelet volume and eosinophil count than the control group (8.38 ± 0.86 vs 6.28 ± 1.6 fL and 0.31 ± 0.42 vs 0.09 ± 0.05; p<0.001 and 0.008, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated a relationship between eosinophil count and MPV in patients with coronary slow flow.
METHODS: This study included 50 coronary slow flow patients (19 males, mean age 65.6 ± 13.7 years) and 30 healthy controls (10 males, mean age 57.86 ± 11.6 years). These participants were evaluated using concurrent routine biochemical tests as well as neutrophil, lymphocyte, and eosinophil counts and mean platelet volume (MPV), which were obtained from the whole blood count. These parameters were compared between groups.
RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the study groups were comparable. The coronary slow flow patients had a higher mean platelet volume and eosinophil count than the control group (8.38 ± 0.86 vs 6.28 ± 1.6 fL and 0.31 ± 0.42 vs 0.09 ± 0.05; p<0.001 and 0.008, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated a relationship between eosinophil count and MPV in patients with coronary slow flow.