Respiratory medicine · 2021
Pressure and length of the lower esophageal sphincter as predictive indicators of therapeutic efficacy of baclofen for refractory gastroesophageal reflux-induced chronic cough.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhu Yiqing, Xu Xianghuai, Zhang Mengru, Si Fengli, Sun Huihui, Yu Li, Qiu Zhongmin
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Therapeutic efficacy of baclofen is suboptimal in the treatment of refractory gastroesophageal reflux-induced chronic cough (GERC). The purpose of the study is to identify its therapeutic predictors in a prospective clinical study.
METHODS: 138 patients with suspected refractory GERC were treated with baclofen. Before the therapy, all the patients underwent esophageal manometry and multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring to establish the diagnosis. After the efficacy of baclofen was evaluated, a stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the therapeutic predictors of baclofen and to establish a regression prediction model.
RESULTS: The overall response rate of baclofen treatment was 52.2% (72/138). The lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) (odds ratio (OR) = 0.592, P = 0.000) and lower esophageal sphincter length (LESL) (OR = 0.144, P = 0.008) were independent predictors of baclofen efficacy. The optimal cut-off point to predict baclofen efficacy for LESP was 11.00 mmHg, with a sensitivity of 83.7% and specificity of 79.1% while that for LESL was 2.35 cm, with a sensitivity of 81.6% and specificity of 72.1%. The highest predictive specificity (90.7%) was achieved when both LESP and LESL were jointly used.
CONCLUSIONS: LESP and LESL may be used to screen the patients with refractory GERC suitable for baclofen therapy and help improve the therapeutic precision.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR- ONC-13003123.
METHODS: 138 patients with suspected refractory GERC were treated with baclofen. Before the therapy, all the patients underwent esophageal manometry and multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring to establish the diagnosis. After the efficacy of baclofen was evaluated, a stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the therapeutic predictors of baclofen and to establish a regression prediction model.
RESULTS: The overall response rate of baclofen treatment was 52.2% (72/138). The lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) (odds ratio (OR) = 0.592, P = 0.000) and lower esophageal sphincter length (LESL) (OR = 0.144, P = 0.008) were independent predictors of baclofen efficacy. The optimal cut-off point to predict baclofen efficacy for LESP was 11.00 mmHg, with a sensitivity of 83.7% and specificity of 79.1% while that for LESL was 2.35 cm, with a sensitivity of 81.6% and specificity of 72.1%. The highest predictive specificity (90.7%) was achieved when both LESP and LESL were jointly used.
CONCLUSIONS: LESP and LESL may be used to screen the patients with refractory GERC suitable for baclofen therapy and help improve the therapeutic precision.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR- ONC-13003123.