Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2019
Comparison between His-bundle pacing guided by Ensite NavX system and conventional fluoroscopy.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hu Yiran, Ding Ligang, Hua Wei, Gu Min, Cai Minsi, Chen Xuhua, Fan Xiaohan, Niu HongXia, Zhang Shu
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Conventional fluoroscopy guidance, permanent His-bundle pacing (HBP) usually involves high fluoroscopy exposure. This study aims to explore the feasibility of Ensite NavX system and compare its pacing parameters and fluoroscopy doses (FD) with that of conventional fluoroscopy guiding HBP.
METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 30 patients receiving HBP from June to January 2019 were prospectively enrolled into this study (15 patients guided by conventional fluoroscopy and 15 patients by NavX system). Procedure time, FD, and pacing parameters were recorded at implant and 3-month follow-up. Fourteen patients (93.3%) underwent successful HBP using Ensite NavX system. The total FD was 1.4 ± 0.5 mGy in NavX group and 16.1 ± 2.2 mGy in conventional group (P < 0.001). The His lead FD was 0.4 ± 0.3 mGy in NavX group and 12.5 ± 2.2 mGy in conventional group (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in pacing parameters at implant and follow-up between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Guided by Ensite NavX system, HBP is efficient with a significant reduction in fluoroscopy exposure.
METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 30 patients receiving HBP from June to January 2019 were prospectively enrolled into this study (15 patients guided by conventional fluoroscopy and 15 patients by NavX system). Procedure time, FD, and pacing parameters were recorded at implant and 3-month follow-up. Fourteen patients (93.3%) underwent successful HBP using Ensite NavX system. The total FD was 1.4 ± 0.5 mGy in NavX group and 16.1 ± 2.2 mGy in conventional group (P < 0.001). The His lead FD was 0.4 ± 0.3 mGy in NavX group and 12.5 ± 2.2 mGy in conventional group (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in pacing parameters at implant and follow-up between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Guided by Ensite NavX system, HBP is efficient with a significant reduction in fluoroscopy exposure.