MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1017/s0950268814002350

Медицинская библиотека · Epidemiology and infection · 2014

Giardiasis in North West England: faecal specimen requesting rates by GP practice.

Reeve N F, Fanshawe T R, Lamden K, Diggle P J, Cheesbrough J, Keegan T J

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Many cases of giardiasis in the UK are undiagnosed and among other things, diagnosis is dependent upon the readiness of GPs to request a specimen. The aim of this study is to assess the rate of specimens requested per GP practice in Central Lancashire, to examine the differences between GP practices and to estimate the pattern of unexplained spatial variation in the practice rate of specimens after adjustment for deprivation. To achieve this, we fitted a set of binomial and Poisson regression models, with random effects for GP practice. Our analysis suggests that there were differences in the rate of specimens by GP practices (P < 0·001) for a single year, but no difference in the proportion of positive tests per specimen submitted or in the rate of positive specimens per practice population. There was a difference in the cumulative rate of positive specimens per practice population over a 9-year period (P < 0·001). Neither the specimen rate per practice for a single year nor the cumulative rate of positive specimens over multiple years demonstrated significant spatial correlation. Hence, spatial variation in the incidence of giardiasis is unlikely to be confounded by variation in GP rate of specimens.

Для цитирования: Reeve N F, Fanshawe T R, Lamden K, Diggle P J, Cheesbrough J, Keegan T J. Giardiasis in North West England: faecal specimen requesting rates by GP practice.. Epidemiology and infection. 2014. DOI: 10.1017/s0950268814002350.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.