RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin · 2011
Depiction of variants of the portal confluence venous system using multidetector row CT: analysis of 916 cases.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Krumm P, Schraml C, Bretschneider C, Seeger A, Klumpp B, Kramer U, Claussen C D, Miller S
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Detailed knowledge of the venous mesenteric system is important for gastrointestinal surgery, particularly for transplantation planning and surgery and for the comprehension of perioperative complications that may influence patient outcome. Data about the mesenteric venous anatomy in the literature varies substantially. The purpose of this study was to categorize venous mesenteric variants and to determine their incidence.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 916 patients requiring diagnostic abdominal CT in the portal venous phase. The mesenteric vein anatomy was categorized as follows: 1. the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) enters the splenic vein (SV); 2. the IMV enters into the angle of the confluence of the SV and superior mesenteric vein (SMV) forming the portal vein (PV); 3. the IMV enters the SMV; 4. seven rare variants. We measured the diameters of the veins and distances from the confluence to the IMV origins.
RESULTS: The frequency of variants was: 1. 37.6%, 2. 28.8%; 3. 19.2%. The rare variants totaled 14.4%. The average vessel diameters measured in cm: PV 1.48; SV 1.02; SMV 1.2; IMV 0.5. The mean IMV entering distances were 1.66 cm in variant 1 and 0.75 cm in variant 3.
CONCLUSION: The three common variants (1, 2 and 3) are the most relevant ones. 14.4% of patients had different anatomic variants. The variability of the mesenteric venous system was higher than previously published. Knowledge of rare variants is important to avoid complications in abdominal surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 916 patients requiring diagnostic abdominal CT in the portal venous phase. The mesenteric vein anatomy was categorized as follows: 1. the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) enters the splenic vein (SV); 2. the IMV enters into the angle of the confluence of the SV and superior mesenteric vein (SMV) forming the portal vein (PV); 3. the IMV enters the SMV; 4. seven rare variants. We measured the diameters of the veins and distances from the confluence to the IMV origins.
RESULTS: The frequency of variants was: 1. 37.6%, 2. 28.8%; 3. 19.2%. The rare variants totaled 14.4%. The average vessel diameters measured in cm: PV 1.48; SV 1.02; SMV 1.2; IMV 0.5. The mean IMV entering distances were 1.66 cm in variant 1 and 0.75 cm in variant 3.
CONCLUSION: The three common variants (1, 2 and 3) are the most relevant ones. 14.4% of patients had different anatomic variants. The variability of the mesenteric venous system was higher than previously published. Knowledge of rare variants is important to avoid complications in abdominal surgery.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AbdomenAbdominal NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overContrast MediaFemaleHumansImage EnhancementImage Processing, Computer-AssistedIntraoperative ComplicationsIohexolMaleMesenteric VeinsMiddle AgedMultidetector Computed TomographyPhlebographyPilot ProjectsPortal VeinProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySplenic VeinYoung Adult