MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s42000-024-00598-z

Медицинская библиотека · Hormones (Athens, Greece) · 2024

Screening tools for diabetic foot ulcers: a narrative review.

Tentolouris Anastasios, Stergioti Anastasia, Eleftheriadou Ioanna, Siafarikas Christos, Tsilingiris Dimitrios

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The prevalence of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) is 4 to 10% among people with diabetes mellitus. DFUs are associated with increased morbidity and mortality as well as reduced quality of life and have a significant impact on overall healthcare expenditure. The main predisposing factors for DFU are diabetic neuropathy, peripheral arterial disease, and trauma. The fact that a range of tests can be used to identify patients at risk for DFU often causes confusion among practitioners regarding which screening tests should be implemented in clinical practice. Herein we sought to determine whether tests of somatic nerve function, such as pinprick sensation, thermal (cold/hot) test, ankle reflexes, vibration perception, 10-g monofilament, Ipswich touch test, neuropathy disability score, and nerve conduction studies, predict the development of DFUs. In addition, we examined whether sudomotor function screening tests, such as Neuropad, sympathetic skin response, and other tests, such as elevated plantar pressure or temperature measurements, can be used for DFU screening. If not treated properly, DFUs can have serious consequences, including amputation, early detection and treatment are vital for patient outcomes.

Для цитирования: Tentolouris Anastasios, Stergioti Anastasia, Eleftheriadou Ioanna, Siafarikas Christos, Tsilingiris Dimitrios. Screening tools for diabetic foot ulcers: a narrative review.. Hormones (Athens, Greece). 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s42000-024-00598-z.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.