MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Turkish neurosurgery · 2011

Cerebro-spinal fluid shunt revisions, importance of the symptoms and shunt structure.

Turhan Tuncer, Ersahin Yusuf, Dinc Muhammet, Mutluer Saffet

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: CSF shunt failure is still a frequent problem in children. This prospective study was designed for focusing symptoms and reasons of shunt failure. We also especially focused on the mechanical reasons of shunt failure.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

We focused on the causes of shunt failures, and the symptoms and signs in patients who were operated for shunt malfunction between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2005 in the neurosurgery department. All examination and operative data were collected prospectively. Evaluation of these data was with the chi-square and Fisher exact tests.

RESULTS

After the evaluation of data on 111 patients and 153 revision procedures, the major symptoms in this group were vomiting (62.16%), somnolence (59.45%) and headache (48.64%). In the majority of the shunt revisions (115 operations, 75.2% of the all 153 procedures), one or more mechanical problems of the shunt systems were identified in surgery.

CONCLUSION

Shunt failures in children sometimes appear with very unusual symptoms. Also, probable structural problems of the shunt systems seem very important for shunt failure according to patient characteristics and etiology of the hydrocephalus. A systematic approach including CT, shunt series and abdominal ultrasound is needed to rule out shunt malfunction.

Для цитирования: Turhan Tuncer, Ersahin Yusuf, Dinc Muhammet, Mutluer Saffet. Cerebro-spinal fluid shunt revisions, importance of the symptoms and shunt structure.. Turkish neurosurgery. 2011.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.