European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
Cancer-control outcomes of Radium- 223-pretreated lutetium- 177-PSMA Radioligand vs. Radium- 223-naïve mCRPC patients.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wenzel Mike, Theissen Lena, Groener Daniel, Kriegmair Maximilian, Graefen Markus, Maurer Tobias, Salomon Georg, Hoeh Benedikt, Siech Carolin, Banek Severine, Chun Felix K H, Mandel Philipp
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Radium- 223 and Lutetium- 177 prostate-specific membrane antigen radioligand therapy (Lu- 177-PSMA) are approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Data on cancer-control outcomes of sequential therapy of Lu- 177-PSMA after radium- 223 are rare.
METHODS: Using the Frankfurt Metastatic Cancer database of the Prostate (FRAMCAP) database, we analyzed progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival of patients after radium- 223 pretreatment vs. radium- 223-naïve controls undergoing Lu- 177-PSMA radioligand within 1 st- 7 th line mCRPC treatment.
RESULTS: Of 329 Lu- 177-PSMA mCRPC patients 19% were radium- 223 pretreated, while 81% radium- 223-naïve. The median number of administered mCRPC systemic treatment administrations were significantly higher for radium- 223 pretreated patients (4 vs. 3, p < 0.01). No difference in further baseline or cancer characteristics were observed, similar to PSA response under Lu- 177-PSMA treatment. In PFS analyses, no significant difference between radium- 223 pretreated vs. radium- 223-naïve Lu- 177-PSMA mCRPC patients were observed, with median PFS of 16 vs. 12 months (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.73, confidence interval [CI]: 0.52-1.02, p = 0.063). In OS analysis, also no significant differences were observed with median OS of 18 vs. 15 months for radium- 223 pretreated vs. radium- 223-naïve Lu- 177-PSMA mCRPC patients (HR: 0.99, CI: 0.71-1.37, p > 0.9). Finally, after additional multivariable adjustment, no differences in PFS and OS outcomes between both groups were observed.
CONCLUSION: Sequential treatment with radium- 223 prior to Lu- 177-PSMA does not affect PFS or OS outcomes in mCRPC patients. Therefore, this real-world cohort suggests that both radiopharmaceuticals can be administered within mCRPC treatment algorithm.
METHODS: Using the Frankfurt Metastatic Cancer database of the Prostate (FRAMCAP) database, we analyzed progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival of patients after radium- 223 pretreatment vs. radium- 223-naïve controls undergoing Lu- 177-PSMA radioligand within 1 st- 7 th line mCRPC treatment.
RESULTS: Of 329 Lu- 177-PSMA mCRPC patients 19% were radium- 223 pretreated, while 81% radium- 223-naïve. The median number of administered mCRPC systemic treatment administrations were significantly higher for radium- 223 pretreated patients (4 vs. 3, p < 0.01). No difference in further baseline or cancer characteristics were observed, similar to PSA response under Lu- 177-PSMA treatment. In PFS analyses, no significant difference between radium- 223 pretreated vs. radium- 223-naïve Lu- 177-PSMA mCRPC patients were observed, with median PFS of 16 vs. 12 months (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.73, confidence interval [CI]: 0.52-1.02, p = 0.063). In OS analysis, also no significant differences were observed with median OS of 18 vs. 15 months for radium- 223 pretreated vs. radium- 223-naïve Lu- 177-PSMA mCRPC patients (HR: 0.99, CI: 0.71-1.37, p > 0.9). Finally, after additional multivariable adjustment, no differences in PFS and OS outcomes between both groups were observed.
CONCLUSION: Sequential treatment with radium- 223 prior to Lu- 177-PSMA does not affect PFS or OS outcomes in mCRPC patients. Therefore, this real-world cohort suggests that both radiopharmaceuticals can be administered within mCRPC treatment algorithm.