Endoscopic imaging of the vermiform appendix (with video).
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Chronic appendicitis may be detected in as many as 10% of patients with right lower quadrant pain. Although the appendiceal orifice is easily identified during colonoscopy, its lumen has not been investigated so far.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the feasibility of endoscopic appendix imaging to identify features of chronic appendicitis in patients with recurrent right lower quadrant pain.
DESIGN
Prospective, proof-of-concept study.
SETTING
University-based tertiary referral hospital.
PATIENTS: Colonoscopy scheduled because of right lower quadrant pain.
INTERVENTIONS: First, the appendix orifice was cannulated with a guidewire and a Jagtome. Next fluoroscopic imaging was performed by injection of contrast agent into the appendix orifice, and then a SpyGlass endoscope was inserted for imaging of the appendiceal mucosa and for biopsy. Patients were monitored 3 hours after investigation, with follow-up at 4 weeks.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Cannulation rate.
RESULTS
Thirteen patients were included. Endoscopic imaging of the appendix was successful in 9 of 13 patients (69%). In 10 patients, a guidewire was placed; in 7 patients, biopsy specimens were taken, revealing histological signs of inflammation in 5. In 4 patients, visible fecoliths were removed by flushing. All patients were discharged on the same day. No adverse events occurred. Three patients reported resolution of pain at follow-up. One patient with strictures at appendicoscopy underwent surgical appendectomy. Histology confirmed the findings of chronic appendicitis with fibrosis.
LIMITATIONS: Patient number limits power for analysis.
CONCLUSION
Endoscopic imaging of the appendix is feasible, safe, and clinically useful in patients with suspected chronic appendicitis.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.