Journal of hypertension · 2004
Aldosterone antagonist facilitates the cardioprotective effects of angiotensin receptor blockers in hypertensive rats.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tanabe Akiyo, Naruse Mitsuhide, Hara Yoshiko, Sato Atsuhisa, Tsuchiya Ken, Nishikawa Toshio, Imaki Toshihiro, Takano Kazue
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence to support the importance of blocking aldosterone to prevent target-organ damage in hypertension. We recently demonstrated an aldosterone breakthrough phenomenon during administration of an angiotensin type 1 receptor blocker (ARB).
OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the pathophysiological significance of residual aldosterone by investigating the influence of the aldosterone antagonist on the cardioprotective effects of the ARB in hypertensive rats.
METHODS: Injection vehicle alone, ARB (1.0 mg/kg per day candesartan by mouth), aldosterone antagonist (10 mg/kg per day spironolactone, subcutaneously), or combined treatment were administered to male stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats for 24 weeks from the age of 4 weeks. Blood pressure, plasma angiotensin II and aldosterone concentrations, left ventricular weight, expression of type I and type III collagen mRNA, and histological findings were determined.
RESULTS: In the ARB-treated group, aldosterone concentrations remained unchanged (1.10 +/- 0.20 nmol/l, compared with 1.17 +/- 0.46 nmol/l in the control group), whereas systolic blood pressure (178 +/- 9 mmHg), left ventricular weight (0.372 +/- 0.035 g/100 g body weight), expression of collagen mRNA, and cardiac interstitial and perivascular fibrosis all decreased significantly compared with the control group (systolic blood pressure: 222 +/- 10 mmHg, P < 0.05; left ventricular weight: 0.483 +/- 0.021 g/100 g body weight, P < 0.05). Although blood pressure (217 +/- 9 mmHg) and left ventricular weight (0.467 +/- 0.027 g/100 g body weight) remained unchanged in the group receiving spironolactone, the expression of both types of collagen mRNA and cardiac interstitial and perivascular fibrosis showed a significant decrease compared with the vehicle-treated group. In the rats receiving combined treatment with the ARB and spironolactone, left ventricular weight (0.352 +/- 0.005 g/100 g body weight, P < 0.05), expression of collagen mRNA, and cardiac interstitial and perivascular fibrosis all showed a further improvement compared with both the ARB and spironolactone groups.
CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that residual aldosterone has a significant impact on target-organ damage in hypertension, even during chronic administration of an ARB. The addition of an aldosterone antagonist has an advantage in facilitating the cardioprotective effects of ARBs.
OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the pathophysiological significance of residual aldosterone by investigating the influence of the aldosterone antagonist on the cardioprotective effects of the ARB in hypertensive rats.
METHODS: Injection vehicle alone, ARB (1.0 mg/kg per day candesartan by mouth), aldosterone antagonist (10 mg/kg per day spironolactone, subcutaneously), or combined treatment were administered to male stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats for 24 weeks from the age of 4 weeks. Blood pressure, plasma angiotensin II and aldosterone concentrations, left ventricular weight, expression of type I and type III collagen mRNA, and histological findings were determined.
RESULTS: In the ARB-treated group, aldosterone concentrations remained unchanged (1.10 +/- 0.20 nmol/l, compared with 1.17 +/- 0.46 nmol/l in the control group), whereas systolic blood pressure (178 +/- 9 mmHg), left ventricular weight (0.372 +/- 0.035 g/100 g body weight), expression of collagen mRNA, and cardiac interstitial and perivascular fibrosis all decreased significantly compared with the control group (systolic blood pressure: 222 +/- 10 mmHg, P < 0.05; left ventricular weight: 0.483 +/- 0.021 g/100 g body weight, P < 0.05). Although blood pressure (217 +/- 9 mmHg) and left ventricular weight (0.467 +/- 0.027 g/100 g body weight) remained unchanged in the group receiving spironolactone, the expression of both types of collagen mRNA and cardiac interstitial and perivascular fibrosis showed a significant decrease compared with the vehicle-treated group. In the rats receiving combined treatment with the ARB and spironolactone, left ventricular weight (0.352 +/- 0.005 g/100 g body weight, P < 0.05), expression of collagen mRNA, and cardiac interstitial and perivascular fibrosis all showed a further improvement compared with both the ARB and spironolactone groups.
CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that residual aldosterone has a significant impact on target-organ damage in hypertension, even during chronic administration of an ARB. The addition of an aldosterone antagonist has an advantage in facilitating the cardioprotective effects of ARBs.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AldosteroneAngiotensin IIAnimalsAntihypertensive AgentsBenzimidazolesBiphenyl CompoundsBody WeightCardiomegalyCardiotonic AgentsCollagen Type ICollagen Type IIIDrug SynergismFibrosisHypertensionMaleMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsMyocardiumRNA, MessengerRatsRats, Inbred SHRRats, Inbred WKYReceptor, Angiotensin, Type 1SpironolactoneTetrazoles