MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2010.08.003

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of diagnostic pathology · 2010

High-grade mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma: comparative genomic hybridization study.

Kuroda Naoto, Naroda Takushi, Tamura Masato, Taguchi Takahiro, Tominaga Akira, Inoue Keiji, Shuin Taro, Lee Gang-Hong, Hes Ondrej, Michal Michal

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma (MTSCC) has recently been integrated into the World Health Organization classification. Although MTSCC is generally a low-grade carcinoma, MTSCC with high-grade morphology has been recently reported. We present the first case of high-grade MTSCC with comparative genomic hybridization findings. A 60-year-old Japanese man presented with weight loss and general fatigue. He underwent radical nephrectomy because of the clinical diagnosis of renal cancer. Histologic examination of renal tumor showed findings of high-grade MTSCC. Comparative genomic hybridization analysis showed gain of chromosomes 1q, 7, 16, 19q, and Y and loss of chromosomes 1p, 6p, 8p, 11q (del(11)(q23)), and 13. G-band karyotype showed gain of chromosomes 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 16, and 20 and loss of chromosome 15. Results of our molecular genetic analysis support the idea that high-grade MTSCC is a real counterpart of low-grade MTSCC. There is no evidence to designate such tumors as unclassified renal cell carcinoma.

Для цитирования: Kuroda Naoto, Naroda Takushi, Tamura Masato, Taguchi Takahiro, Tominaga Akira, Inoue Keiji, Shuin Taro, Lee Gang-Hong, Hes Ondrej, Michal Michal. High-grade mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma: comparative genomic hybridization study.. Annals of diagnostic pathology. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2010.08.003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.