Nephron · 2015
Prospective Analysis of Various Dosing Methods for Aminoglycosides and Vancomycin Therapy in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury Patients.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Jennifer Pai, Truong Thuy Thu
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/AIM: Several methods have been proposed for the better estimation of creatinine clearance (CLCR) in spinal cord injury (SCI); however, there is no standard method to date. In 2011, Lee-Dang derived an equation to predict CLCR more accurately, although it was limited by problems inherent in any retrospective study of previously collected data. Thus, a prospective investigation was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of clinical implementation and accuracy of the Lee-Dang method against 5 other methods while controlling sources of bias and confounding.
METHODS: A prospective investigation included 100 patients who met the inclusion criteria, given as follows: a diagnosis of SCI and administration of intravenous aminoglycosides (AG) or vancomycin with their dosing regimen determined by the Lee-Dang equation. The percentage of patients achieving therapeutic goal was determined, and the measured AG and vancomycin drug clearance (mCL(DRUG)) values were compared with the results that were estimated from 6 equations.
RESULTS: The Lee-Dang equation was found to be more accurate, with a smaller magnitude of variance from mCL(DRUG) and smaller residuals and bias compared with the alternatives. The Lee-Dang method resulted in >90% of patients achieving the steady state serum concentrations within the pre-defined goal for AG and vancomycin. All other predictive methods grossly overestimated CLCR and produced markedly lower frequency (<50%) of achieving the goal for both antimicrobials (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The prospective data shows that the Lee-Dang method for predicting CLCR is more accurate relative to the alternative methods in the study population with SCI, thus recommend using the Lee-Dang method for pharmacokinetic dosing of AG and vancomycin in SCI.
METHODS: A prospective investigation included 100 patients who met the inclusion criteria, given as follows: a diagnosis of SCI and administration of intravenous aminoglycosides (AG) or vancomycin with their dosing regimen determined by the Lee-Dang equation. The percentage of patients achieving therapeutic goal was determined, and the measured AG and vancomycin drug clearance (mCL(DRUG)) values were compared with the results that were estimated from 6 equations.
RESULTS: The Lee-Dang equation was found to be more accurate, with a smaller magnitude of variance from mCL(DRUG) and smaller residuals and bias compared with the alternatives. The Lee-Dang method resulted in >90% of patients achieving the steady state serum concentrations within the pre-defined goal for AG and vancomycin. All other predictive methods grossly overestimated CLCR and produced markedly lower frequency (<50%) of achieving the goal for both antimicrobials (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The prospective data shows that the Lee-Dang method for predicting CLCR is more accurate relative to the alternative methods in the study population with SCI, thus recommend using the Lee-Dang method for pharmacokinetic dosing of AG and vancomycin in SCI.