DOI 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.107290
The Gap in the Thickness: Estimating Effectiveness of Pulmonary Nodule Detection in Thick- and Thin-Section CT Images with 3D Deep Neural Networks.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVES
There is a noticeable gap in diagnostic evidence strength between the thick and thin scans of Low-Dose CT (LDCT) for pulmonary nodule detection. When the thin scans are needed is unknown, especially when aided with an artificial intelligence nodule detection system.
METHODS
A case study is conducted with a set of 1,000 pulmonary nodule screening LDCT scans with both thick (5.0mm), and thin (1.0mm) section scans available. Pulmonary nodule detection is performed by human and artificial intelligence models for nodule detection developed using 3D convolutional neural networks (CNNs). The intra-sample consistency is evaluated with thick and thin scans, for both clinical doctor and NN (neural network) models. Free receiver operating characteristic (FROC) is used to measure the accuracy of humans and NNs.
RESULTS
Trained NNs outperform humans with small nodules < 6.0mm, which is a good complement to human ability. For nodules > 6.0mm, human and NNs perform similarly while human takes a fractional advantage. By allowing a few more FPs, a significant sensitivity improvement can be achieved with NNs.
CONCLUSIONS
There is a performance gap between the thick and thin scans for pulmonary nodule detection regarding both false negatives and false positives. NNs can help reduce false negatives when the nodules are small and trade off the false negatives for sensitivity. A combination of human and trained NNs is a promising way to achieve a fast and accurate diagnosis.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.