Journal of critical care · 2010
Alveolar recruitment maneuver in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a comparison of 2 approaches.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nemer Sérgio N, Caldeira Jefferson B, Azeredo Leandro M, Garcia João Márcio, Silva Ricardo T, Prado Darwin, Santos Ricardo G, Guimarães Bruno S, Ramos Rodrigo A, Noé Rosângela A, Souza Paulo Cesar P
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to compare 2 alveolar recruitment maneuvers (ARMs) approaches in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixteen SAH patients with ARDS were randomized in 2 similar groups. One received ARM with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) of 35 cm H(2)O for 40 seconds (CPAP recruitment), whereas the other received pressure control ventilation with positive-end expiratory pressure of 15 cm H(2)O and pressure control above positive end-expiratory pressure of 35 cm H(2)O for 2 minutes (pressure control recruitment maneuver [PCRM]). Intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) were measured before and after ARM. The ratio of arterial oxygen tension to fraction of inspired oxygen was measured before and 1 hour after the ARM.
RESULTS: After ARM, ICP was higher in CPAP recruitment (20.50 ± 4.75 vs 13.13 ± 3.56 mm Hg; P = .003); and CPP was lower in CPAP recruitment (62.38 ± 9.81 vs 79.60 ± 6.8 mm Hg; P = .001). One hour after the ARM, the ratio of arterial oxygen tension to fraction of inspired oxygen increased significantly only in PCRM (108.5 to 203.6; P = .0078).
CONCLUSION: In SAH patients with ARDS, PCRM did not affect ICP and decreased CPP in safe levels, besides improving oxygenation.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixteen SAH patients with ARDS were randomized in 2 similar groups. One received ARM with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) of 35 cm H(2)O for 40 seconds (CPAP recruitment), whereas the other received pressure control ventilation with positive-end expiratory pressure of 15 cm H(2)O and pressure control above positive end-expiratory pressure of 35 cm H(2)O for 2 minutes (pressure control recruitment maneuver [PCRM]). Intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) were measured before and after ARM. The ratio of arterial oxygen tension to fraction of inspired oxygen was measured before and 1 hour after the ARM.
RESULTS: After ARM, ICP was higher in CPAP recruitment (20.50 ± 4.75 vs 13.13 ± 3.56 mm Hg; P = .003); and CPP was lower in CPAP recruitment (62.38 ± 9.81 vs 79.60 ± 6.8 mm Hg; P = .001). One hour after the ARM, the ratio of arterial oxygen tension to fraction of inspired oxygen increased significantly only in PCRM (108.5 to 203.6; P = .0078).
CONCLUSION: In SAH patients with ARDS, PCRM did not affect ICP and decreased CPP in safe levels, besides improving oxygenation.