Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries · 2016
Effects of mobility training on severe burn patients in the BICU: A retrospective cohort study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Deng Huan, Chen Jian, Li Frank, Li-Tsang Cecilia W P, Liu Qiushi, Ma Xiaohong, Ao Ming, Chen Nan, Zhou Yaqin, Zhong Xiaoyun, Chen Zhiyu, Cao Lei, He Guiyang, Wu Jun
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To assess the effects of mobility training on severe burn patients in the Burn Intensive Care Unit (BICU).
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. Severe burn patients with equal to or more than 50% Total Body Surface Area (TBSA) burns who received early rehabilitation in the BICU were included in this study. Based on the different early rehabilitation strategies during the two periods, patients admitted to the BICU from January 2011 to April 2013 were identified as the passive training cohort (n=49) while patients admitted to the BICU from May 2013 to December 2013 were identified as the mobility training cohort (n=24). Data on length of BICU stay, length of hospital stay, length of rehabilitation in the BICU, ventilator dependent days, strict bed rest time, range of motion (ROM), the Barthel Index (BI) and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) were collected.
RESULTS: Compared with the passive training cohort, patients in the mobility training cohort had significantly shorter length of BICU stay (p=0.002), length of hospital stay (p=0.010), strict bed rest time (p<0.001) and length of rehabilitation in the BICU (p=0.026) with improved ROM of shoulder, wrist, hip, knee and ankle joints.
CONCLUSIONS: Mobility training in the BICU was shown to be feasible and effective in achieving better outcomes than passive training for severe burn patients.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. Severe burn patients with equal to or more than 50% Total Body Surface Area (TBSA) burns who received early rehabilitation in the BICU were included in this study. Based on the different early rehabilitation strategies during the two periods, patients admitted to the BICU from January 2011 to April 2013 were identified as the passive training cohort (n=49) while patients admitted to the BICU from May 2013 to December 2013 were identified as the mobility training cohort (n=24). Data on length of BICU stay, length of hospital stay, length of rehabilitation in the BICU, ventilator dependent days, strict bed rest time, range of motion (ROM), the Barthel Index (BI) and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) were collected.
RESULTS: Compared with the passive training cohort, patients in the mobility training cohort had significantly shorter length of BICU stay (p=0.002), length of hospital stay (p=0.010), strict bed rest time (p<0.001) and length of rehabilitation in the BICU (p=0.026) with improved ROM of shoulder, wrist, hip, knee and ankle joints.
CONCLUSIONS: Mobility training in the BICU was shown to be feasible and effective in achieving better outcomes than passive training for severe burn patients.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Activities of Daily LivingAdultAnkle JointBed RestBody Surface AreaBurn UnitsBurnsCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesEarly Medical InterventionFeasibility StudiesFemaleHip JointHumansIntensive Care UnitsKnee JointLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedMobility LimitationPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRange of Motion, ArticularRespiration, ArtificialRetrospective StudiesShoulder JointTrauma Severity IndicesTreatment OutcomeWrist Joint