Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2016
Efficacy and effectiveness of anti-digoxin antibodies in chronic digoxin poisonings from the DORA study (ATOM-1).
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chan Betty S, Isbister Geoffrey K, O'Leary Margaret, Chiew Angela, Buckley Nicholas A
Аннотация
CONTEXT: We hypothesized that in chronic digoxin toxicity, anti-digoxin antibodies (Fab) would be efficacious in binding digoxin, but this may not translate into improved clinical outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate changes in free digoxin concentrations and clinical effects on heart rate and potassium concentrations in chronic digoxin poisoning when anti-digoxin Fab are given.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective observational study. Patients were recruited if they have been treated with anti-digoxin Fab for chronic digoxin poisoning. Data was entered into a standardised prospective form, supplemented with medical records. Their serum or plasma was collected, analysed for free and bound digoxin and free anti-digoxin Fab concentrations.
RESULTS: From September 2013 to February 2015, 36 patients (median age, 78 years; 22 females) were recruited from 18 hospitals. Median heart rate (HR) was 49 beats/min. Initial median digoxin and potassium concentrations were 4.7 nmol/L (3.6 μg/L) (range: 2.3-11.2 nmol/L) and 5.3 mmol/L (range: 2.9-9.2 mmol/L) respectively. Beta-blockers (n = 18), calcium antagonists (n = 6), spironolactone and/or angiotensin blocking agents (n = 24) were also used concomitantly. Renal impairment and gastrointestinal symptoms were present in 31 (86%) and 22 (63%) patients respectively. Five patients died from conditions unrelated to digoxin toxicity. Median change in HR was 8 beats/min post-Fab with no effect on blood pressure; they were 4, 10 and 17 beats/min for the 1, 2 and ≥3 vials of anti-digoxin Fab groups respectively. Concomitant treatments with potassium lowering agents (12/36) and inotropic drugs (7/36) were used. Gastrointestinal effects resolved in all 22 patients. The median decrease for potassium was 0.3 mmol/L. Digoxin concentration reduced from 3.8 to 0 nmol/L post-Fab. There was a rebound observed in the free digoxin concentration in 25 patients but none had associated clinical deterioration.
CONCLUSIONS: One to two vials of anti-digoxin Fab initially bound all free digoxin confirming Fab efficacy. However, this was associated with only a moderate improvement in HR and potassium, suggesting bradyarrhythmia and hyperkalaemia may be from other co-morbidities.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate changes in free digoxin concentrations and clinical effects on heart rate and potassium concentrations in chronic digoxin poisoning when anti-digoxin Fab are given.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective observational study. Patients were recruited if they have been treated with anti-digoxin Fab for chronic digoxin poisoning. Data was entered into a standardised prospective form, supplemented with medical records. Their serum or plasma was collected, analysed for free and bound digoxin and free anti-digoxin Fab concentrations.
RESULTS: From September 2013 to February 2015, 36 patients (median age, 78 years; 22 females) were recruited from 18 hospitals. Median heart rate (HR) was 49 beats/min. Initial median digoxin and potassium concentrations were 4.7 nmol/L (3.6 μg/L) (range: 2.3-11.2 nmol/L) and 5.3 mmol/L (range: 2.9-9.2 mmol/L) respectively. Beta-blockers (n = 18), calcium antagonists (n = 6), spironolactone and/or angiotensin blocking agents (n = 24) were also used concomitantly. Renal impairment and gastrointestinal symptoms were present in 31 (86%) and 22 (63%) patients respectively. Five patients died from conditions unrelated to digoxin toxicity. Median change in HR was 8 beats/min post-Fab with no effect on blood pressure; they were 4, 10 and 17 beats/min for the 1, 2 and ≥3 vials of anti-digoxin Fab groups respectively. Concomitant treatments with potassium lowering agents (12/36) and inotropic drugs (7/36) were used. Gastrointestinal effects resolved in all 22 patients. The median decrease for potassium was 0.3 mmol/L. Digoxin concentration reduced from 3.8 to 0 nmol/L post-Fab. There was a rebound observed in the free digoxin concentration in 25 patients but none had associated clinical deterioration.
CONCLUSIONS: One to two vials of anti-digoxin Fab initially bound all free digoxin confirming Fab efficacy. However, this was associated with only a moderate improvement in HR and potassium, suggesting bradyarrhythmia and hyperkalaemia may be from other co-morbidities.