MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1213/ane.0000000000007087

Медицинская библиотека · Anesthesia and analgesia · 2024

Neurological Complications After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Review.

Mangold Adam S, Benincasa Stefano, Sanders Benjamin M, Patel Kinjal, Mitrev Ludmil

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become the dominant procedural modality for aortic valve replacement in the United States. The reported rates of neurological complications in patients undergoing TAVR have changed over time and are dependent on diagnostic definitions and modalities. Most strokes after TAVR are likely embolic in origin, and the incidence of stroke has decreased over time. Studies have yielded conflicting results when comparing stroke rates between TAVR and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), especially due to differences in diagnostic criteria and neurocognitive testing. In this narrative review, we summarize the available data on the incidence of stroke, delirium, and cognitive decline after TAVR and highlight potential areas in need of future research. We also discuss silent cerebral ischemic lesions (SCILs) and their association with a decline in postoperative neurocognitive status after TAVR. Finally, we describe that the risk of delirium and postoperative decline is increased when nonfemoral access routes are used, and we highlight the need for standardized imaging and valid, repeatable methodologies to assess cognitive changes after TAVR.

Для цитирования: Mangold Adam S, Benincasa Stefano, Sanders Benjamin M, Patel Kinjal, Mitrev Ludmil. Neurological Complications After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Review.. Anesthesia and analgesia. 2024. DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000007087.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.