m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2012

Effects of lip revision surgery on long-term orosensory function in patients with cleft lip/palate.

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Essick Greg, Phillips Ceib, Chung Yunro, Trotman Carroll-Ann

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE : To determine whether secondary lip revision surgery impacts sensitivity of the upper lip. DESIGN : A three-group, parallel, prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial. SETTING : University of North Carolina School of Dentistry. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS : Three groups: (1) patients with repaired cleft lip/palate who were scheduled for lip revision (revision; N = 20); (2) patients with repaired cleft lip/palate who did not receive a lip revision (non-revision; N = 13); and (3) non-cleft control subjects (non-cleft; N = 22). Interventions : Lip revision surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES : Measures of (1) two-point perception threshold (two-point), (2) warmth detection threshold (warm), and (3) cool detection threshold (cool) were obtained from two sites on the upper lip vermilion. The revision participants were tested approximately 1 week before surgery and then approximately 3 and 12 months after surgery. The non-revision and non-cleft participants were tested at similar times. RESULTS : There were no significant differences among the three groups at baseline for two-point, warm, or cool. The main effects of group, age, sex, and time were not statistically significant for the two-point or warm (p > .05). The mean differences between the 3- and 12-month follow-up visits and baseline for two-point and warm were small for all three groups. For cool, group was statistically significant (p = .04), the difference in the non-revision group between follow-up and baseline was 31% to 34% higher than in the non-cleft group (p = .01). CONCLUSIONS : Although at postsurgery revision participants exhibited threshold values comparable to presurgical values, the sensory differences observed among subgroups of participants with cleft lip are complex.

Предметные рубрики MeSH