The influence of mode of dialysis pretransplantation on long-term renal allograft outcome.
Аннотация
To determine the influence of the need and the mode of dialysis prior to transplantation on long-term renal allograft survival and subsequent renal function, all 662 consecutive cyclosporine-treated renal transplants (484 cadaver and 178 living-related donors), performed between 1983 and 1989 were retrospectively analyzed. Recipients were divided into 3 groups as follows: group I and II recipients underwent hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis, respectively, prior to transplantation; group III patients were transplanted without dialysis. All groups were similar with respect to demographic and immunologic characteristics, apart from a higher proportion of diabetic and White patients in both cadaver and living-related group III recipients and a fewer number of blood transfusions among living-related group III recipients. A trend toward a decreased incidence of dialysis dependence in the early posttransplant period was noted among cadaver donor recipients in group III (20%) when compared to group I and II patients (36% and 26%, respectively). The incidence of rejection episodes was similar in all groups. No difference in 1- and 5-year patient survival was noted among all recipient groups. Actual 1-year graft survivals in groups I, II, and III were similar (73%, 72%, and 74%, respectively, for cadaver donor; and 86%, 89%, and 91%, respectively for living-related donor recipients). Likewise, actuarial 5-year graft survivals were not significantly different (53%, 51%, and 67%, respectively, for cadaver donor; and 75%, 69%, and 82%, for living-related donor recipients). Renal function, as assessed by serum creatinine concentration, was similar and stable in all recipient groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.