MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0377-1237(02)80133-2

Медицинская библиотека · Medical journal, Armed Forces India · 2011

Is Catgut Really Obsolete? Experience with Buried Subcuticular Catgut Sutures in Operative Wounds.

Sharma Alok, Mehrotra Sandeep

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A good scar after surgery is desirable. Skin closure with subcuticular sutures is known to give better scars. Absorbable sutures reduce suture track infection. Catgut is a monofilament absorbable suture, which has not been generally recommended for skin for fear of infection and dehiscence. Buried subcuticular sutures using catgut were given in 350 cases after surgery. Disorders known to impair wound healing were excluded. Infection and dehiscence was noted in only 4.3% cases. Dehiscence in the absence of wound infection was seen in only two cases (0.6%). Excellent healing with fine linear scars was the result in 92% patients. Catgut can be safely used for skin closure by the described technique of buried subcuticular sutures in clean surgical wounds with gratifying results. It has advantages over its synthetic counterparts of easy availability, economy and good handling. The fear of poor result with catgut as a skin suture is unfounded.

Для цитирования: Sharma Alok, Mehrotra Sandeep. Is Catgut Really Obsolete? Experience with Buried Subcuticular Catgut Sutures in Operative Wounds.. Medical journal, Armed Forces India. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/s0377-1237(02)80133-2.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.