MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1128/aac.35.2.228

Медицинская библиотека · Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 1991

Comparison of methods for in vitro testing of susceptibility of porcine Mycoplasma species to antimicrobial agents.

Ter Laak E A, Pijpers A, Noordergraaf J H, Schoevers E C, Verheijden J H

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The MICs of 18 antimicrobial agents used against strains of three porcine Mycoplasma species were determined by a serial broth dilution method. Twenty field strains of M. hyorhinis, ten field strains of M. hyopneumoniae, six field strains of M. flocculare, and the type strains of these species were tested. Twelve field strains and the type strain of M. hyorhinis were also tested by an agar dilution method. Tests were read at various time points. When the broth dilution method was used, the final MIC had to be read 2 days after color changes had stopped. MICs of tetracycline, oxytetracycline, doxycycline, and minocycline were low for the three Mycoplasma species tested. MICs of chlortetracycline were 8 to 16 times higher than MICs of the other tetracyclines. Spiramycin, tylosin, kitasamycin, spectinomycin, tiamulin, lincomycin, and clindamycin were effective against all strains of M. hyorhinis and M. hyopneumoniae. The quinolones were highly effective against M. hyopneumoniae but less effective against M. hyorhinis. The susceptibility patterns for M. hyopneumoniae and M. flocculare were similar.

Для цитирования: Ter Laak E A, Pijpers A, Noordergraaf J H, Schoevers E C, Verheijden J H. Comparison of methods for in vitro testing of susceptibility of porcine Mycoplasma species to antimicrobial agents.. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 1991. DOI: 10.1128/aac.35.2.228.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.