MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/09687637

Медицинская библиотека · Drugs (Abingdon, England) · 2014

Challenging biopower: "Liquid cuffs" and the "Junkie" habitus.

Gelpi-Acosta Camila

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Methadone maintenance treatment program (MMTP) is associated with improved quality of life amongst many heroin users. Still, program adherence problems remain a fact.

AIM: To improve our understanding of MMTP "adherence problems".

METHODS

Using snowball sampling, two subgroups were recruited: MMTP enrollees and non-enrollees. A semi-structured questionnaire guided all in-depth interviews. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, hand-coded and analyzed using a grounded theory approach.

FINDINGS: Of 28 participants, 23 were male and Fifteen were in MMTP. All were NYC residents. Most were Hispanic (57%) and Caucasian (32%). The average age was 38 years. Twenty-two had a General Educational Development or less. All were poor and 64% were homeless. Many do not enroll in MMTP to quit heroin but to avoid physical withdrawals. Once enrolled, problems emerge with program regulations and methadone's pharmacology. These they refer to as "liquid cuffs". Drawing on Michel Foucault, methadone may be considered a disciplinary biopower technology that participants challenge using specific strategies. A "Junkie" habitus, crystallized by emotional and identitarian heroin-dispositions, also challenges biopower.

CONCLUSIONS

The "liquid cuffs" experience along with the "Junkie" habitus effectively challenge disciplinary biopower. Loosening program regulations may improve quality of services and reduce harm.

Для цитирования: Gelpi-Acosta Camila. Challenging biopower: "Liquid cuffs" and the "Junkie" habitus.. Drugs (Abingdon, England). 2014. DOI: 10.3109/09687637.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.