DOI 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.01.032
Risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage among residents in 7 nursing homes in Shanghai, China.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Nursing home residents are a population at risk for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriage, but few data about MRSA in this setting in Shanghai are available. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence and risk factors for MRSA carriage in nursing home residents in Shanghai, China.
METHODS
Four hundred forty-three residents from 7 nursing homes in Shanghai, China, participated in this study; nasal and axillary swabs were obtained from these residents. Laboratory identification for S aureus and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were performed when isolated. Data, including individual resident characteristics and nursing home characteristics, were collected and analyzed.
RESULTS
Of the 443 participating residents, 99 (22.3%) and 45 (10.2%) residents were colonized by S aureus and MRSA, respectively. Previous hospitalization (odds ratio [OR], 2.564; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.214-5.415; P = .014), presence of an invasive device (OR, 3.455; 95% CI, 1.678-7.113; P = .001), chloramphenicol therapy (OR, 7.672; 95% CI, 1.807-32.580; P = .006), and macrolides therapy (OR, 2.796; 95% CI, 1.056-7.403; P = .038) were independent risk factors for MRSA colonization. Low expenditure per month and less good sanitary condition also increased the risk for MRSA colonization.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study suggests that nursing homes are significant reservoirs for MRSA. Implementation of infection control strategies must be given high priority in nursing homes to fight the high prevalence of MRSA, and increased convenience and feasibility should also be realized with these control strategies for MRSA colonization.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.