MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jsams.2021.07.002

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of science and medicine in sport · 2021

Neurocognitive function and musculoskeletal injury risk in sports:A systematic review.

Wilke Jan, Groneberg David A

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

A variety of modifiable risk factors has been suggested to predict musculoskeletal injury in sports. Screening paradigms and exercise-based prevention programs, so far, frequently focused on physical parameters such as strength, balance or flexibility. However, less is known with regard to the impact of brain function. We investigated the relation between cognition and the occurrence of injury in athletes.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

Database searches using Pubmed, Web of Science and Google Scholar returned nine cohort and case-control studies, which almost exclusively examined college athletes engaging in open skill sports. Methodological quality, rated by means of a modified Downs and Black checklist, was moderate (12/17 points).

RESULTS

Seven out of the nine included studies suggested that lower-order cognitive function (i.e. visuomotor reaction time) is systematically associated with the occurrence of injury. No paper examined the impact of executive function.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite initial evidence pointing towards a potentially injury-predictive role of lower-order cognitive function, several issues including the use of more variable populations and outcomes remain to be addressed before definitive recommendations for clinicians can be made.

Для цитирования: Wilke Jan, Groneberg David A. Neurocognitive function and musculoskeletal injury risk in sports:A systematic review.. Journal of science and medicine in sport. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2021.07.002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.