The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2017
Gender Differences in Mobility Device Use Among U.S. Older Adults.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Peterson Lindsay J, Meng Hongdao, Dobbs Debra, Hyer Kathryn
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Research has shown greater mobility limitations among women than men. We aimed to examine (a) gender differences in the use of canes for mobility and (b) what factors contribute to these differences under the frameworks of the disablement model and the Theory of Planned Behavior.
METHOD: Using National Health and Aging Trends Study data, we estimated hierarchical logistic regression models to predict the likelihood of cane use among older adults who completed performance-based measures (n = 5,503). We tested the interactions between gender and selected variables to further understand gender difference.
RESULTS: In unadjusted analysis, 22% of women and 16% of men used canes. In models adjusted in steps for sociodemographics, health, physical impairments, capacity, psychosocial, and social environment factors, women were progressively less likely to use canes, significantly so at the last step. Suppression effect analyses showed the influence of living alone and receiving mobility help variables. Interaction analyses showed that women reporting poor health or balance were less likely to use canes; obese women were more likely.
DISCUSSION: Significant gender differences exist in cane use among older community-living adults. Findings suggest that health and function partly account for these differences. Future research is needed to understand social/cultural factors involved.
METHOD: Using National Health and Aging Trends Study data, we estimated hierarchical logistic regression models to predict the likelihood of cane use among older adults who completed performance-based measures (n = 5,503). We tested the interactions between gender and selected variables to further understand gender difference.
RESULTS: In unadjusted analysis, 22% of women and 16% of men used canes. In models adjusted in steps for sociodemographics, health, physical impairments, capacity, psychosocial, and social environment factors, women were progressively less likely to use canes, significantly so at the last step. Suppression effect analyses showed the influence of living alone and receiving mobility help variables. Interaction analyses showed that women reporting poor health or balance were less likely to use canes; obese women were more likely.
DISCUSSION: Significant gender differences exist in cane use among older community-living adults. Findings suggest that health and function partly account for these differences. Future research is needed to understand social/cultural factors involved.